User talk:Koopalmier: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(90 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:Palkia47/Welcome}}
==Archives==
[[User talk:Koopalmier/Archive 1]]


== Images for userboxes in main character articles ==
[[User:Koopalmier|Koopalmier]] 13:21, 18 September 2011 (EDT)


{{reminder|2=continuously replacing images with latest artworks in character userboxes for main articles|M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! 12:25, 9 September 2008 (EDT)}}
==Paper Mario series page==
More specifically, in main character articles like Peach, Daisy, Wario, and so forth, we usually go with what image is more appropriate for that page's character infobox. We don't need all of them to be replaced with their latest artworks (in your case, your attempting to replace them with their artworks for ''Mario Super Sluggers''). --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! 12:25, 9 September 2008 (EDT)


== About the images ==
Oh hey, your work rewriting the Paper Mario series page is very much appreciated! However, I noticed the bulk of itis centered around the character sections; there's [http://www.marioboards.com/index.php?topic=32903.0 a forum thread on how merdique the series pages are] and the concencus so far is to scrap the character sections entirely.
Cool. I use alot of kinds of emulators tho :P. Romsite has the exact same type of images you uploaded so the site you gave me must be the source for all the images on romsite. {{User:Super-Yoshi/sig}}


Did you download the DS emulator that I gave you ? It's in French, but you can find ALL the DS roms for ALL the regions ! It's like this that I've played Suepr Mario 64 DS in Japanese.  
Obviously a forum thread is not the most accurate way to get concensus, so I'll make a proposal about this in the coming days. I'm adivising you of this so that you do not waste efforts on a section that may be scrapped in the near-future. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 11:23, 21 August 2016 (EDT)
PS: The emulator haven't the recent ROMs (for exemple: Sonic Chronicles).
:I don't believe that the character sections should be removed for the RPG series, as they are too relevant to the genre (unlike with the main Mario series, which are platformers with a much lesser focus on story or characters). I'm beginning with the character sections on the series page but I plan to work on everything I can eventually, just in case it seemed like I was only going to work on the characters page, so I won't mind if it needs to be removed completely. Anyway, thanks for the heads-up! [[User:Koopalmier|Koopalmier]] ([[User talk:Koopalmier|talk]]) 11:49, 21 August 2016 (EDT)


[[User:Koopalmier|Koopalmier]] 07:34, 30 October 2008 (EDT)
== Genre ==


== Flying Raccoon ==
[[User:Mario jc|Both]] [[User:BabyLuigiOnFire|users]] had a point. It may be an Action Adventure but it's an RPG too. They may've said it was not one but it still has RPG elements so that is enough for it to be classified as one. Thanks. {{User:Fawful's Minion/sig}} 04:52, 25 August 2016 (EDT)
:They used the term "action-adventure" only to advertise their product, like how [http://img.gamefaqs.net/box/8/0/4/7804_back.jpg the original Paper Mario uses the action-adventure tagline to advertise its game]. I'd rather take what we saw of the gameplay footage to assume the genre than rely on marketer's talking points. "Action-adventure" sounds nice and hip anyway. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 14:43, 27 August 2016 (EDT)


Hello, Koopalmier, can you say from where you got ''[[Super Mario Bros. 3]]'''s assumed Japanese title "Super Mario Bros. 3: Flying Racoon" (and it would be written "raccoon" rather than "racoon") that you added in the article? I never heard of that before. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 13:18, 1 December 2008 (EST)
== Specifics for SMG2 being parallel to SMG ==


:In case you didn't noticed it, there is a little of text under the Japanese title. A French Mario serious site (well, it's not a 13 years-old kid that made it) named Mario Museum. You will need a traductor. http://www.mario-museum.net/ (I don't really remeber where it's written)
Can you specifically point out where it's said that SMG2 is in a parallel world to SMG in the Japanese Wikipedia page you linked? I checked the story section there and all I got out of it is that it's another story about stardust. [[User:SmokedChili|SmokedChili]] ([[User talk:SmokedChili|Talk]]) ([[User:SmokedChili/Thoughts Page|Thoughts]]) 06:33, 19 November 2016 (EST)
[[User:Koopalmier|Koopalmier]] 14:30, 1 December 2008 (EST)
::I found a shot of the Japanese [http://www.otakaraou.com/zoom/55955 box art], but can't see an additional line there (スーパーマリオブラザーズ is just ''Super Mario Bros.''). I visited the site you told about, and found this piece of text:
::<blockquote>Puis en 1989 arrive Super Mario Bros. 3 qui sera rebaptisé Super Mario Bros. 4: Flying Raccoon au Japon (le raton-laveur volant) car le troisième épisode de la saga, selon les Japonais, c’est le SMB2 américain, qui sortira enfin chez eux sous le nom de Super Mario USA en 1992… avant une réédition des Lost Levels en 1993 car Super Mario All Stars avait l’ambition de faire connaître ce jeu aux publics américain et européen!</blockquote>
::Well, it tells that ''Super Mario Bros. 3'' was later ''renamed'' in Japan to ''Super Mario Bros. '''4''': Flying Raccoon''. However, that conflicts with the fact that ''Super Mario World'' was also officially known as ''Super Mario Bros. 4'' in Japan. That piece of text really [[:Image:SMW JapaneseCover.jpg|exists]]. I've never seen anywhere that ''SMB3'' was referred to as ''SMB4: Flying Raccoon'' in Japanese, it is always called ''SMB3'' and the western ''Super Mario Bros. 2'' is always called ''Super Mario USA'' (otherwise, they had to rename this game ''Super Mario Bros. 3'' by the logic of "Flying Raccoon"). I think one single fansite [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22super+mario+bros.+4+flying+raccoon%22&btnG=Search in the whole Internet] that uses this title can't be used to back up the info, especially when it even conflicts true facts. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 15:13, 1 December 2008 (EST)
 
==Hi==
Hello Koopalmier, I am Mario3v how are  you just asking k? --[[Image:SAGAMARIO.JPG|20px]]{{User|Mario3v}}[[Image:SAGAMARIO.JPG|20px]] 12:25, 5 February 2009 (EST)
:I'm bored as hell, I'm sad and I want to have Mario & Luigi 3 more than everything.
And you ? How are you ? [[User:Koopalmier|Koopalmier]] 12:27, 5 February 2009 (EST)
 
I am fine, I too wished I had Mario & Luigi 3 o well. {{User:Mario3v/sig}}
 
==DS Emulator==
Which one are you using? {{User:Super-Yoshi/sig}}
:DeSmuME 9.1 and a patched ROM.
[[User:Koopalmier|Koopalmier]] 13:26, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
 
== Hi! ==
Yeah, Fawful is crazy! I'm really excited to see him in M&L 3. Wouldn't it be cool if he were in Mario and Sonic at the Winter Olympic Games?! If he were in it, I would play him every time and he could be good rivals with Dr. Eggman or Bowser![[User:fawfulfury65|fawfulfury65]][[Image:Dark_Fawful_sprite.PNG]] I HAVE AWESOMENESS!
:He's dead, so I don't think Nintendo would add him in M&S... Seriously, why do all the epic bad guys must die ?! Plus he was supposed to appear in the third saga of SMBZ... T.T [[User:Koopalmier|Koopalmier]] 15:25, 8 August 2009 (EDT)
 
Well, Mario beat Bowser a ton of times and yet Bowser always comes back. Mario and Sonic at the Olympics is a sports game that does nothing with the M&L series. Besides, Alphadream and Nintendo could always find a way to bring back Fawful in a Mario and Luigi 4(If there ever is a Mario and Luigi 4). It IS so annoying that the awesome characters have to die!!! So, do you have a Wii? [[user:fawfulfury65|fawfulfury65]][[Image:Dark_Fawful_sprite.PNG]]I WILL RETURN!!!
:Yes. [[User:Koopalmier|Koopalmier]] 20:59, 8 August 2009 (EDT)
 
Actually, for get about the question about you having a Wii. Did you see the 7th episode of Super Mario Bros Z (You know what that is, right?) It's over an hour long! And I don't think I could sit in front of my computer for a whole hour! [[user:fawfulfury65|fawfulfury65]][[Image:Dark_Fawful_sprite.PNG]]
 
==Proposal==
Sorry, we had to remove your vote on the FI proposal. You "per'd" Jardim's vote, which 3 users found invalid. Of course, you're allowed to add your vote again with a modified reason. Thanks for your understanding. {{User|Time Q}}

Latest revision as of 06:33, November 19, 2016

Archives[edit]

User talk:Koopalmier/Archive 1

Koopalmier 13:21, 18 September 2011 (EDT)

Paper Mario series page[edit]

Oh hey, your work rewriting the Paper Mario series page is very much appreciated! However, I noticed the bulk of itis centered around the character sections; there's a forum thread on how merdique the series pages are and the concencus so far is to scrap the character sections entirely.

Obviously a forum thread is not the most accurate way to get concensus, so I'll make a proposal about this in the coming days. I'm adivising you of this so that you do not waste efforts on a section that may be scrapped in the near-future. --Glowsquid (talk) 11:23, 21 August 2016 (EDT)

I don't believe that the character sections should be removed for the RPG series, as they are too relevant to the genre (unlike with the main Mario series, which are platformers with a much lesser focus on story or characters). I'm beginning with the character sections on the series page but I plan to work on everything I can eventually, just in case it seemed like I was only going to work on the characters page, so I won't mind if it needs to be removed completely. Anyway, thanks for the heads-up! Koopalmier (talk) 11:49, 21 August 2016 (EDT)

Genre[edit]

Both users had a point. It may be an Action Adventure but it's an RPG too. They may've said it was not one but it still has RPG elements so that is enough for it to be classified as one. Thanks. A personal signature image for me! The RPG Gamer (talk) (edits) Christmasmario.jpg 04:52, 25 August 2016 (EDT)

They used the term "action-adventure" only to advertise their product, like how the original Paper Mario uses the action-adventure tagline to advertise its game. I'd rather take what we saw of the gameplay footage to assume the genre than rely on marketer's talking points. "Action-adventure" sounds nice and hip anyway. BabyLuigiFire.pngRay Trace(T|C) 14:43, 27 August 2016 (EDT)

Specifics for SMG2 being parallel to SMG[edit]

Can you specifically point out where it's said that SMG2 is in a parallel world to SMG in the Japanese Wikipedia page you linked? I checked the story section there and all I got out of it is that it's another story about stardust. SmokedChili (Talk) (Thoughts) 06:33, 19 November 2016 (EST)