MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Honeyhive Galaxy: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{UNFANOMFAIL
|nominated=00:53 3 December 2010 (UTC)
|nominated=00:53 3 December 2010 (UTC)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=20 December 2010
|nosupport=True
}}
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} It has a rewrite template now...


==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
Line 13: Line 13:
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Oh yes. Merci. PS I can't speak French, and Tucayo, um, don't create passive sentences.
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Oh yes. Merci. PS I can't speak French, and Tucayo, um, don't create passive sentences.
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} - Sono molto bellissimo ancora.
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} - Sono molto bellissimo ancora.
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} Per tout. :)


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
=====Fawfulfury65=====
#{{user|Tucayo}} - Problems solved
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Wario removed that template.
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} - Per all.
#{{User|Bowser's luma}} Per Tucayo.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
Fawfulfury, you're supposed to add a reason for unfeature nominations. If this is a feature nomination, yeah, it's allowed. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
Fawfulfury, you're supposed to add a reason for unfeature nominations. If this is a feature nomination, yeah, it's allowed. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}


Wait, how come this article does not show up on [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles|this]] page under "FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing"? {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
Wait, how come this article does not show up on [[MarioWiki:Featured articles|this]] page under "FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing"? {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}


65: There is no tense template. Instead, we have a blue one. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
65: There is no tense template. Instead, we have a blue one. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}

Latest revision as of 11:59, September 14, 2016

Honeyhive Galaxy

Honeyhive Galaxy was nominated to be unfeatured at 00:53 3 December 2010 (UTC).

Honeyhive Galaxy failed unfeaturing requirements at 00:00, 20 December 2010, and is currently able to be renominated.

Remove Featured Article Status

Keep Featured Article Status

  1. Bowser's luma (talk) Since Tucayo fixed the tense and such, it's now fine. Merci boucoup Tucayo (and I leave you speaking French to a Mexican...)
  2. Tucayo (talk) - Oh yes, I need to vote here XP per BL. Sil vous plait. Wait...
  3. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Oh yes. Merci. PS I can't speak French, and Tucayo, um, don't create passive sentences.
  4. Gamefreak75 (talk) - Sono molto bellissimo ancora.
  5. MrConcreteDonkey (talk) Per tout. :)

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

Comments

Fawfulfury, you're supposed to add a reason for unfeature nominations. If this is a feature nomination, yeah, it's allowed. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

Wait, how come this article does not show up on this page under "FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing"? BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

65: There is no tense template. Instead, we have a blue one. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

I'll fix the demonstratives thing. Tucayo (talk)

It seems as if the verb tense template was changed to a different rewrite template, but still, that's against the rules. Bowser's luma (talk)

All problems have been solved. It was written terribly Tucayo (talk)

Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/Unfeature/N1/Honeyhive_Galaxy&oldid=2057027"