MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Honeyhive Galaxy: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{UNFANOMFAIL
|nominated=00:53 3 December 2010 (UTC)
|nominated=00:53 3 December 2010 (UTC)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=20 December 2010
|nosupport=True
}}
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} It has a rewrite template now...


==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
Line 12: Line 12:
#{{user|Tucayo}} - Oh yes, I need to vote here XP per BL. Sil vous plait. Wait...
#{{user|Tucayo}} - Oh yes, I need to vote here XP per BL. Sil vous plait. Wait...
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Oh yes. Merci. PS I can't speak French, and Tucayo, um, don't create passive sentences.
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Oh yes. Merci. PS I can't speak French, and Tucayo, um, don't create passive sentences.
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} - Sono molto bellissimo ancora.
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} Per tout. :)


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
=====Fawfulfury65=====
#{{user|Tucayo}} - Problems solved
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Wario removed that template.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
Fawfulfury, you're supposed to add a reason for unfeature nominations. If this is a feature nomination, yeah, it's allowed. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
Fawfulfury, you're supposed to add a reason for unfeature nominations. If this is a feature nomination, yeah, it's allowed. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}


Wait, how come this article does not show up on [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles|this]] page under "FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing"? {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
Wait, how come this article does not show up on [[MarioWiki:Featured articles|this]] page under "FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing"? {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}


65: There is no tense template. Instead, we have a blue one. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
65: There is no tense template. Instead, we have a blue one. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}

Latest revision as of 10:59, September 14, 2016

Honeyhive Galaxy[edit]

Remove Featured Article Status[edit]

Keep Featured Article Status[edit]

  1. Bowser's luma (talk) Since Tucayo fixed the tense and such, it's now fine. Merci boucoup Tucayo (and I leave you speaking French to a Mexican...)
  2. Tucayo (talk) - Oh yes, I need to vote here XP per BL. Sil vous plait. Wait...
  3. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Oh yes. Merci. PS I can't speak French, and Tucayo, um, don't create passive sentences.
  4. Gamefreak75 (talk) - Sono molto bellissimo ancora.
  5. MrConcreteDonkey (talk) Per tout. :)

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]

Comments[edit]

Fawfulfury, you're supposed to add a reason for unfeature nominations. If this is a feature nomination, yeah, it's allowed. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

Wait, how come this article does not show up on this page under "FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing"? BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

65: There is no tense template. Instead, we have a blue one. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

I'll fix the demonstratives thing. Tucayo (talk)

It seems as if the verb tense template was changed to a different rewrite template, but still, that's against the rules. Bowser's luma (talk)

All problems have been solved. It was written terribly Tucayo (talk)