MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Dixie Kong: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
YoshiFan1200 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (Porplemontage moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Dixie Kong to MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Dixie Kong: Fix) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated=20:54, 23 February 2013 | |nominated=20:54, 23 February 2013 | ||
| | |lastedit=20:54, 24 April 2013 | ||
|nosupport=false | |||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
| Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Rewrite template is gone. The article itself was terribly written. Not only were there tense errors, but a plethora of comma splices, mentioning of Donkey Kong as "Donkey", continuous misspellings of "where" as "were", and so much else. If only that was the reason of unfeaturing it instead of pointing out there's a rewrite template there and nothing else....nevertheless, I corrected all the major errors that are found BESIDES the ones pointed out by the rewrite template. | #{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Rewrite template is gone. The article itself was terribly written. Not only were there tense errors, but a plethora of comma splices, mentioning of Donkey Kong as "Donkey", continuous misspellings of "where" as "were", and so much else. If only that was the reason of unfeaturing it instead of pointing out there's a rewrite template there and nothing else....nevertheless, I corrected all the major errors that are found BESIDES the ones pointed out by the rewrite template. | ||
#{{User|YoshiFan1200}} BabyLuigiOnFire corrected the rewrite problem. Also, the article is very large. | #{{User|YoshiFan1200}} BabyLuigiOnFire corrected the rewrite problem. Also, the article is very large. | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} The rewrite template is swiftly corrected and dealt with. If there are any problems concerning with the rewrite template, please elaborate, or we'll be happy to remove it. | |||
#{{User|Toadette and Koopa Bros. Lover}} Per all | |||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
[[Unfeaturing failure archives|*]] | |||
Latest revision as of 10:59, September 14, 2016
Dixie Kong
Remove Featured Article Status
- Yoshi876 (talk) There is a rewrite template on the top of the article
- GreenDisaster (talk) The rewrite template is well-deserved. A very large chunk of the article is sentences that could be written a lot better.
- King Pikante (talk) If there is a rewrite template on an article, why should it be featured?
Keep Featured Article Status
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Rewrite template is gone. The article itself was terribly written. Not only were there tense errors, but a plethora of comma splices, mentioning of Donkey Kong as "Donkey", continuous misspellings of "where" as "were", and so much else. If only that was the reason of unfeaturing it instead of pointing out there's a rewrite template there and nothing else....nevertheless, I corrected all the major errors that are found BESIDES the ones pointed out by the rewrite template.
- YoshiFan1200 (talk) BabyLuigiOnFire corrected the rewrite problem. Also, the article is very large.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) The rewrite template is swiftly corrected and dealt with. If there are any problems concerning with the rewrite template, please elaborate, or we'll be happy to remove it.
- Toadette and Koopa Bros. Lover (talk) Per all
