MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Super Paper Mario: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/A/Super Paper Mario]]
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
{{FANOMFAIL
|nominated=22:30, 19 June 2013 (EST)
|lastedit=04:15, 20 June 2013
|nosupport=true
}}
==== Support ====
#{{User|Tanookitoad}}
==== Oppose ====
#{{User|Pinkie Pie}} I strongly disagree with you. The Super Paper Mario page isn't ready to be featured, because the rewritten template is still on the page, meaning it need to be rewritten before it can be featured.
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} The rewrite complaint that unfeatured the article in the first place is still there, so why did you renominate it if the problems aren't fixed?
#{{User|Mr. Game & Watch}} The article itself is still in poor condition; there's still a lot of flowery writing, I saw some grammar mistakes mixed around the page, and there's still a rewrite template on it.
#{{User|Time Turner}} Per everything that got this article unfeatured in the first place.
#{{User|Yoshi876}} Per all, also shouldn't you have a reason for nominating this?
 
==== Removal of Opposes ====
 
==== Comments ====

Latest revision as of 11:59, September 14, 2016

Super Paper Mario[edit]

Support[edit]

  1. Tanookitoad (talk)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Pinkie Pie (talk) I strongly disagree with you. The Super Paper Mario page isn't ready to be featured, because the rewritten template is still on the page, meaning it need to be rewritten before it can be featured.
  2. Baby Luigi (talk) The rewrite complaint that unfeatured the article in the first place is still there, so why did you renominate it if the problems aren't fixed?
  3. Mr. Game & Watch (talk) The article itself is still in poor condition; there's still a lot of flowery writing, I saw some grammar mistakes mixed around the page, and there's still a rewrite template on it.
  4. Time Turner (talk) Per everything that got this article unfeatured in the first place.
  5. Yoshi876 (talk) Per all, also shouldn't you have a reason for nominating this?

Removal of Opposes[edit]

Comments[edit]