MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Bike: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: __NOTOC__ ===Bike=== {{FANOMSTAT |nominated=4:39, 6 March 2010 |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by...) |
m (Porplemontage moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N1/Bike to MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Bike: Fix) |
||
(18 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{FANOMFAIL | |||
{{ | |nominated=4:39, March 6, 2010 | ||
|nominated=4:39, 6 | |lastedit=7:39, 15 April 2010 | ||
| | |nosupport=false | ||
}} | }} | ||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | |||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|KS3}} Nice article, a lot of pics, no errors, perfect for the FA. | #{{User|KS3}} Nice article, a lot of pics, no errors, perfect for the FA. | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
#{{User|Reversinator}} Come on, a better introduction could surely be used. Also, the images make the article look disorganized. | |||
#{{user|Coincollector}} The article is too short for me. | |||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Way too short, man. And a longer, better introduction. | |||
#{{User|Byllant}} A lot of images? there are only two of them, and it's quite short. | |||
#{{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} Oh, come on. This is way too short, or barely reaches the limit. It has barely any pictures, and could be better written. It's not always about prefect grammar, it's about if it is truthful. | |||
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Terrible article. Per all. | |||
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} The Mario Kart DS section is more something that should be in a trivia section, but the article barely says anything anyway | |||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== |
Latest revision as of 10:58, September 14, 2016
Bike
Support
Oppose
- Reversinator (talk) Come on, a better introduction could surely be used. Also, the images make the article look disorganized.
- Coincollector (talk) The article is too short for me.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Way too short, man. And a longer, better introduction.
- Byllant (talk) A lot of images? there are only two of them, and it's quite short.
- Baby Mario Bloops (talk) Oh, come on. This is way too short, or barely reaches the limit. It has barely any pictures, and could be better written. It's not always about prefect grammar, it's about if it is truthful.
- Fawfulfury65 (talk) Terrible article. Per all.
- Commander Code-8 (talk) The Mario Kart DS section is more something that should be in a trivia section, but the article barely says anything anyway