Talk:Para Mask Koopa: Difference between revisions
LinkTheLefty (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
As this affects a not-insignificant number of article, I feel this would be a better fit for the regular proposal page. I've talked to other admins on IRC about this and they agree. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 21:42, 17 April 2015 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 21:42, April 17, 2015
Is this official? My Bloody Valentine
- The name is the only unofficial thing I see.
Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)·
There are no such things as blue Koopa Paratroopas so how can there be blue masked ones like the one in the image?--Platform 05:30, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
Merge post-Special Zone enemies or Split G[al]oomba (Super Mario Advance 2) and Pokey (Super Mario Advance 2)
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Monday, March 10, 2025, 21:23 GMT
It seems a little incongruous that the Super Mario World enemy skins are split but the Super Mario Advance 2-exclusive ones are not. At the same time, besides the alternate names in the SNES version, there isn't any real sign to consider these different enemies. I think the case for merging is stronger, but I'll leave the option to instead split the rest of them.
Proposer: LinkTheLefty (talk)
Deadline: May 1, 2015 (23:59 GMT)
Merge post-Special Zone enemies to original enemy articles
- LinkTheLefty (talk) It was always an aesthetic difference to begin with, and merging eliminates at least one conjectural-titled article.
Split G[al]oomba (Super Mario Advance 2) from Galoomba and Pokey (Super Mario Advance 2) from Pokey
Comments
As this affects a not-insignificant number of article, I feel this would be a better fit for the regular proposal page. I've talked to other admins on IRC about this and they agree. --Glowsquid (talk) 21:42, 17 April 2015 (EDT)
