Talk:Hyrule Circuit

Pages for Deku Baba and Rupee should be created, image help requested. Toadbrigade5 (talk) 19:05, 6 November 2014 (EST)

Create Pages for Deku Baba and Rupee

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Sunday, April 6, 2025, 07:16 GMT

Okay, I know this is Zelda stuff, but it appears in a mario game, and is not a minor cameo, they are ITEMS and obstacles. Under Mariowiki guidlines the things says crossovers get full coverage. I believe the Mario Kart 8 dlc is by FAR a cross over, and therefor these pages should be created. And that they're important. But Mario Wiki guidlines first.

Proposer: Toadbrigade5 (talk)
Deadline: November 20 2014, 23:59 GMT

Support

1. Toadbrigade5 (talk) Per proposal.
2. Time Turner (talk) Regardless of what they're based on as whether or not they're simple model swaps of other things, they are still something that appears with an individual appearance in the Mario series. By all means, they deserve articles.
3. WiiURob (talk) It's The Legend of Zelda >> CROSSOVER SIGN << Mario Kart 8. Crossovers need full coverage, that is that.

Oppose

1. Mario (talk)
   1. The premise of the proposal is seriously flawed, that the DLC pack for Mario Kart 8 is deemed a crossover and therefore should get full coverage according to policy. The problem is, the amount of non-Mario content is comparable to the Mario content in NBA Street V3 (three Mario playable characters and a Mario-themed court), which is agreed to have guest appearances rather than an actual crossover. For Mario Kart 8 to be a crossover, there has to be maybe four more entire cups composed of only Link tracks and maybe 16 Link characters. It's a stretch to call this a crossover, but I'm opposing mainly because of the next two reasons.
   2. Rupees are most likely coin reskins; at best they're just a nice touch and detail added to a Link course and that's it. They can easily go in the track article, since otherwise, the Rupee article itself is redundant. There may be an argument for additional Rupee appearances, but those are mostly covered in List of references in the Mario series, which is probably a far better place to cover Rupees and stuff there.
   3. Deku Babas are skinned Piranha Plant clones, and again, are included for the Link feel. Their information fits as easily within the track article, and a standalone article would be redundant.
2. BabyLuigi64 (talk) Per Mario.
3. Boo4761 (talk) Per Mario.

Comments

I'm a little iffy on this. Should we really create articles on enemies that suddenly are appearing in one course? From what I've seen, Deku Babas are probably like Piranha Plants, and Rupees (definitely) work exactly like a coin. They're acting like Mario objects as they would appear in other courses. BabyLuigi64

Yeah, but isn't Mario wiki rules that Crossovers get full coverage? And yeah Deku Babas are Piranha Plant clones.
— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Toadbrigade5 (talk).

I'm quite undecised too, but I'm thinking I'll oppose. Since they work exactly like Coins and Piranha Plants, they may just be modified models. And I'm not sure potential model "hacks" get an article. We may just link to ZeldaWiki. Depends what the policy says about this. TSUNAMI

Yes, it's policy that crossovers get full coverage, but this isn't a crossover. It's guest appearances. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 15:32, 7 November 2014 (EST)

How about redirecting “Rupee” to “Coin”? Rupees seem to be a variant of Coins, so it could be listed in the same page as Coins. Likewise, Deku Babas may also be considered as a variant of Piranha Plants. Hippopo (talk) 09:11, 7 November 2014 (EST)

I'd suggest redirecting Rupee and Deku Babas to the main track article because that's their only appearance. Meanwhile, the Coin article and the Piranha Plant article can get a mention or two about the track that contains those entities. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 15:32, 7 November 2014 (EST)

Four link cups? Is Mario Sports Mix considered a cross over when it barely has any Fianl Fantasy? Should we delete Malboro? Toadbrigade5 (talk) 17:07, 7 November 2014 (EST)

Mario Sports Mix verges almost into cross-over, with the Behemoth boss and the Chocobo song as well as a few Final Fantasy playable characters. The line isn't definite sometimes, but I don't think the content in Mario Hoops 3-on-3 and Mario Sports Mix is quite enough to make it a crossover. The title of the game is still Mario Sports Mix, and Mario still takes up the vast majority of the game. Finally, I'd argue for a merge of Malboro and Malboro Garden in the similar way the King Bulbin and Lord Bullbo pages were unanimously agreed to be merged in to their stage article. Actually, that proposal is probably my cited precedent for this proposal, and I'm staying consistent with that precedent. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 18:31, 7 November 2014 (EST)

Regardless of what you'd argue, it is seperate and that way it stays, so this should be seperate too.

So... you're just dismissing my argument? Okay... well... It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 18:49, 7 November 2014 (EST)

Okay, I reread the coverage. 1, wiki only doesn't cover if mario guest appears in a different game. If a guest appears in a Mario game, that is to be covered. Therefor, I believe this is no longer necessary, and I can just go ahead right? Toadbrigade5 (talk) 18:33, 7 November 2014 (EST)

1. Mario guest appears in SSX on Tour, NBA Street V3, and a Birdo appears in Captain Rainbow, which has "forgotten" characters from various Nintendo games). Those games are covered as far as I know.
2. If a guest appears in a Mario game, that guest should get an article regarding solely to that game. Major entities such as guest-related items and tracks also get pages. Stage hazards, however, should not get pages, especially if they appear only in the guest-related track.

I don't know what you mean by "going ahead with it". But my arguments either way.
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 18:49, 7 November 2014 (EST)