MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario Kart: Super Circuit: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
(→‎Remove Featured Article Status: I am OK with the article now)
Line 5: Line 5:
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Ashley and Red}} The article has flowery writing ('' The objective in this game is to place first in the races, as with most racing games. Each race has eight contestants, all trying to win. The player can pick up Item Boxes which contain items. Using these items are very helpful, but computer-controlled characters can also use items.''); Obviously things are explained I don't know why (''Objective is get in first place... Oh, really? I didn't tought that).'' The article itself, with exception of the Characters section is bad writing (There are lots of dots where shouldn't be). For me, this article and specially the first and 2nd sections are most uneeded info.
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====  
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====  
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} I wouldn't call this article "flowery writing". Sure, maybe it has some Captain Obvious points (which I fixed) but it's all objective and straight to the point: I don't see any padding. I don't see the bad writing either; your point about "too many dots where it shouldn't be"? Do you mean periods or bullet points? Your points are very vague and I just don't see any problem with this article. Of course '''I''' wrote most of this....................so I might be a bit biased about it.
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} I wouldn't call this article "flowery writing". Sure, maybe it has some Captain Obvious points (which I fixed) but it's all objective and straight to the point: I don't see any padding. I don't see the bad writing either; your point about "too many dots where it shouldn't be"? Do you mean periods or bullet points? Your points are very vague and I just don't see any problem with this article. Of course '''I''' wrote most of this....................so I might be a bit biased about it.

Revision as of 11:08, May 21, 2014

Mario Kart: Super Circuit

Mario Kart: Super Circuit, a featured article, was nominated to be unfeatured at 21:09, 20 May 2014 (EDT). If the nomination does not pass by 01:09, 20 July 2014, it will be considered failed.

Keep Featured Article Status

  1. Baby Luigi (talk) I wouldn't call this article "flowery writing". Sure, maybe it has some Captain Obvious points (which I fixed) but it's all objective and straight to the point: I don't see any padding. I don't see the bad writing either; your point about "too many dots where it shouldn't be"? Do you mean periods or bullet points? Your points are very vague and I just don't see any problem with this article. Of course I wrote most of this....................so I might be a bit biased about it.
  2. Yoshi876 (talk) Per Baby Luigi, I wouldn't call that writing flowery.

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

Comments

Also in the reception section Joao mispelled. The correct is .João. I know it 'cause this is my name :P User:Ashley anEoTselkie/sig

If you read the source, that's where I got the name from. There's no accent in the name for some reason in the source. BabyLuigiFire.pngRay Trace(T|C) 21:20, 20 May 2014 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario_Kart:_Super_Circuit&oldid=1683913"