MarioWiki talk:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Rawk Hawk: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::The user, Pinkie Pie, moved the page with the following reason: "[original proposer slashed out his vote] mean that the unfeatureing fails." There's nothing on the original proposer cancelling it and I'm not sure if FA's are treated the same way as proposals: I don't think you can cancel the FA early unless, of course, it was made with ill intent or just random, which isn't the case here. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 13:40, 18 February 2014 (EST) | ::The user, Pinkie Pie, moved the page with the following reason: "[original proposer slashed out his vote] mean that the unfeatureing fails." There's nothing on the original proposer cancelling it and I'm not sure if FA's are treated the same way as proposals: I don't think you can cancel the FA early unless, of course, it was made with ill intent or just random, which isn't the case here. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 13:40, 18 February 2014 (EST) | ||
:::^<sub>Baby Luigi, make you include the [sic] in the quotes.</sub> I think the problem is mostly fixed, but I guess you can ask the nominator, Ashley and Red if he's okay with canceling the nomination. {{User:Mario/sig}} 13:50, 18 February 2014 (EST) | :::^<sub>Baby Luigi, make you include the [sic] in the quotes.</sub> I think the problem is mostly fixed, but I guess you can ask the nominator, Ashley and Red if he's okay with canceling the nomination. {{User:Mario/sig}} 13:50, 18 February 2014 (EST) | ||
:::Yeah, it just seems like the gun was jumped before their input was given. {{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 13:54, 18 February 2014 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 13:54, February 18, 2014
This failed because the original proposer redacted his vote? This isn't logical nor does it abide by the rules. Please move this nomination back. 
Ray Trace(T|C) 13:20, 18 February 2014 (EST)
- Based on what? I agree, the process seems to have gone pretty off the rails, but I recall there being something in the rules about the page being removed if the proposer agreed. Then again, I haven't given the rule page a look in a while, and I've not much experience in the feature process, so in the event I'm wrong about that, we'll want to be sure our bases are still covered regardless.
Lord G. matters. 13:38, 18 February 2014 (EST)
- The user, Pinkie Pie, moved the page with the following reason: "[original proposer slashed out his vote] mean that the unfeatureing fails." There's nothing on the original proposer cancelling it and I'm not sure if FA's are treated the same way as proposals: I don't think you can cancel the FA early unless, of course, it was made with ill intent or just random, which isn't the case here.
Ray Trace(T|C) 13:40, 18 February 2014 (EST)
- ^Baby Luigi, make you include the [sic] in the quotes. I think the problem is mostly fixed, but I guess you can ask the nominator, Ashley and Red if he's okay with canceling the nomination.
Mario-HOHO! (Talk / Stalk) 13:50, 18 February 2014 (EST) - Yeah, it just seems like the gun was jumped before their input was given. Lord G. matters. 13:54, 18 February 2014 (EST)
- ^Baby Luigi, make you include the [sic] in the quotes. I think the problem is mostly fixed, but I guess you can ask the nominator, Ashley and Red if he's okay with canceling the nomination.
- The user, Pinkie Pie, moved the page with the following reason: "[original proposer slashed out his vote] mean that the unfeatureing fails." There's nothing on the original proposer cancelling it and I'm not sure if FA's are treated the same way as proposals: I don't think you can cancel the FA early unless, of course, it was made with ill intent or just random, which isn't the case here.
