Talk:Stache: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(It's not answered yet.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk}} | |||
Isn't the correct term in ''[[Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga]]'' and ''[[Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time]]'', 'Stache, not Moustache? =| {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}} | Isn't the correct term in ''[[Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga]]'' and ''[[Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time]]'', 'Stache, not Moustache? =| {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}} | ||
Revision as of 23:19, March 20, 2013
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Isn't the correct term in Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga and Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time, 'Stache, not Moustache? =| My Bloody Valentine
It is called 'Stache. Full Metal Moogle
Wow. This really exists? A very minor subject that serves no purpose gameplay-wise has an article. Just like Mario's Shirt. That proposal ended with this result: disallow articles on subjects that have no effect on gameplay. I know that in Partners in Time, 'Stache allows you to bargain prices, but that's so minor. So, what will we do? Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- I haven't played Partners in Time, so I don't know. If its role in this game is too minor, we should merge the relevant info (there is some interesting info) from this article into Mario. Objections? Time Questions 13:47, 21 February 2010 (EST)
- Luigi also has a "'Stache" of the same relevance in the game, so it wouldn't be right to limit it to Mario. --Grandy02 19:54, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm bringing this up again. Why do we have an article like this? Until somebody gives me a convincing reason to keep this article, then I want to delete it and put relevant information in other articles. Why not just write an article on Mario's nose? Seriously, the only gameplay mechanic the mustache serves is in the Mario & Luigi games, as far as I know, and it's a stat. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 00:02, 21 March 2013 (EDT)