MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Dixie Kong: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
YoshiFan1200 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Rewrite template is gone. The article itself was terribly written. Not only were there tense errors, but a plethora of comma splices, mentioning of Donkey Kong as "Donkey", continuous misspellings of "where" as "were", and so much else. If only that was the reason of unfeaturing it instead of pointing out there's a rewrite template there and nothing else....nevertheless, I corrected all the major errors that are found BESIDES the ones pointed out by the rewrite template. | #{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Rewrite template is gone. The article itself was terribly written. Not only were there tense errors, but a plethora of comma splices, mentioning of Donkey Kong as "Donkey", continuous misspellings of "where" as "were", and so much else. If only that was the reason of unfeaturing it instead of pointing out there's a rewrite template there and nothing else....nevertheless, I corrected all the major errors that are found BESIDES the ones pointed out by the rewrite template. | ||
#{{User|YoshiFan1200}} BabyLuigiOnFire corrected the rewrite problem. Also, the article is very large. | #{{User|YoshiFan1200}} BabyLuigiOnFire corrected the rewrite problem. Also, the article is very large. | ||
Revision as of 23:34, February 23, 2013
Dixie Kong
Remove Featured Article Status
- Yoshi876 (talk) There is a rewrite template on the top of the article
- GreenDisaster (talk) The rewrite template is well-deserved. A very large chunk of the article is sentences that could be written a lot better.
- King Pikante (talk) If there is a rewrite template on an article, why should it be featured?
Keep Featured Article Status
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Rewrite template is gone. The article itself was terribly written. Not only were there tense errors, but a plethora of comma splices, mentioning of Donkey Kong as "Donkey", continuous misspellings of "where" as "were", and so much else. If only that was the reason of unfeaturing it instead of pointing out there's a rewrite template there and nothing else....nevertheless, I corrected all the major errors that are found BESIDES the ones pointed out by the rewrite template.
- YoshiFan1200 (talk) BabyLuigiOnFire corrected the rewrite problem. Also, the article is very large.
