Talk:Bell Kritter: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Coooool123 (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
#{{User|YoshiKong}} Per policy. | #{{User|YoshiKong}} Per policy. | ||
#{{User|Coooool123}} Per Yoshikong. Plus, do we really need yet another tiny article, wasting space? MERGE POWER!!! | #{{User|Coooool123}} Per Yoshikong. Plus, do we really need yet another tiny article, wasting space? MERGE POWER!!! | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Why does this even have an article in the first place when it can be easily merged into Kritter? | |||
====Oppose==== | ====Oppose==== | ||
====Comments?==== | ====Comments?==== |
Revision as of 23:09, October 5, 2012
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Is there anything that separates these Kritters from other Kritters? Hello, I'm Time Turner.
They seem to be characters, but extremely minor characters. I agree, this article probably shouldn't stand alone.--Knife (talk) 04:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Merge this article with Kritter#Donkey Kong 64
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Friday, November 22, 2024, 23:41 GMT
As discussed above, this article concerns a minor subject which is subordinated from a greater species. I stand by the policy at MarioWiki:Minor NPCs, which describes that conjectural-named, minor characters should be merged with their relevant species.
Proposer: YoshiKong (talk)
Deadline: October 17 2012, 23:59 GMT
Support
- YoshiKong (talk) Per policy.
- Coooool123 (talk) Per Yoshikong. Plus, do we really need yet another tiny article, wasting space? MERGE POWER!!!
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Why does this even have an article in the first place when it can be easily merged into Kritter?