Talk:Donkey Kong Original Edition: Difference between revisions
Jjrapper100 (talk | contribs) (→Split) |
Reddragon19k (talk | contribs) (→Split) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#{{User|Ryandavhet}} - Per proposal.The Super Mario Advance one was mine.I changed my mind and I agree that these articals should go together. | #{{User|Ryandavhet}} - Per proposal.The Super Mario Advance one was mine.I changed my mind and I agree that these articals should go together. | ||
#{{User|Jjrapper100}} - Per Ryandavhet I think it's a good idea just because it has a couple of new features does not make it a new game. | #{{User|Jjrapper100}} - Per Ryandavhet I think it's a good idea just because it has a couple of new features does not make it a new game. | ||
#{{User|Reddragon19k}} - Per both! | |||
===Keep=== | ===Keep=== |
Revision as of 19:23, August 26, 2011
Merge with Donkey Kong
![]() |
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Tuesday, March 25, 2025, 16:09 GMT
This needed to be done sooner or later. This is way worse than the Super Mario Advance thing. There is no real changes,and it's a very short article.
Proposer: yoshiyoshiyoshi (talk)
Deadline:August 31, 2011, 23:59 GMT
Split
- Ryandavhet (talk) - Per proposal.The Super Mario Advance one was mine.I changed my mind and I agree that these articals should go together.
- Jjrapper100 (talk) - Per Ryandavhet I think it's a good idea just because it has a couple of new features does not make it a new game.
- Reddragon19k (talk) - Per both!
Keep
Comments
Why on earth would you make a TPP for this, if someone already made a proposal that regards this? The proposal is still in voting. DKPetey99TCE 09:10, 17 August 2011 (EDT)
We could have just scrapped this page if this TPP hadn't been made - now we're stuck waiting until the 31st. Also, the deadline was wrong and the proposer didn't list it on the proposals page. Learn the rules. And name your headers correctly: it should be "Merge", not "Split". (Or just use "Support"/"Oppose".) - Walkazo 23:30, 25 August 2011 (EDT)