MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/27: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 984: | Line 984: | ||
@TyphlosionBlaze: Confusing to American users? If this proposal passes, imagine how confusing it's going to be to non-American users (which is basically most of the rest of the world). {{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} | @TyphlosionBlaze: Confusing to American users? If this proposal passes, imagine how confusing it's going to be to non-American users (which is basically most of the rest of the world). {{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} | ||
}} | |||
===SmashWiki=== | |||
<span style="color:red;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">LEAVE AS IS 4-26</span> | |||
Since the game Super Smash Bros. has a similar name with Super Mario Bros., people thought it was a Mario title. So people created a Super Smash Bros. page on MarioWiki. Then someone created a number of useless articles such as [[Zelda]] and [[Lucario]]. MarioWiki should not have articles about Pokemon and Zelda, that is the work of Bulbapedia and ZeldaWiki. There is even a SmashWiki to hold Super Smash Bros. information. All of the info in MarioWiki on Super Smash Bros. should be about Mario characters only. We should remove all Pokemon and Zelda articles. | |||
{{scrollbox|content= | |||
'''Proposer''': {{User|leetc}}<br> | |||
'''Deadline''': August 19, 2011, 23:59 GMT | |||
====Support==== | |||
#{{User|Leetc}} Per proposal. | |||
#{{User|Wii Fan}} Per Proposal. | |||
#{{User|Jman2401}} Up to a point I agree anything not Mario releated should be taken off. But I think stats should be left on | |||
#{{User|wildgoosespeeeder}} I agree with that argument only to some point. Articles that contain cameos from game series not from the Mario universe link to their designated Wiki. SSB articles should link SSB-specific characters/items to SmashWiki. Keep the games SSB, SSBM, and SSBB because they contain Mario characters/items but the contents of those games should be linked to SmashWiki. | |||
====Oppose==== | |||
#{{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} We have these articles cause their mandated by are coverage policy which i believe calls the Super Smash Bros. series a spin off of the Mario Series. And we've had this conversation before both on this wiki and on the NIWA forums themselves and we always come to the same decision so per those fights and per our coverage policy | |||
#{{User|Zero777}} One, offensive, two, I think the Smash Wiki copied and altered the info originally from the Mario Wiki, and your proposal isn't done right, and three, Per Goomba's Shoe15. | |||
#{{User|Lakituthequick}} The Super Smash Bros. series are sort of spin off, and for that reason all the characters have to be on THIS site too. Per first two. | |||
#{{User|Yoshiwaker}} - Per above and the opposers of [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive#DK_Wiki|this proposal]], since these are basically the same proposal with different targets. | |||
#{{User|Superfiremario}} SSB includes Mario, plus we cover Zelda, Pokemon and that stuff. | |||
#{{User|Super Mario Bros.}} – To remove our ''Super Smash Bros.'' content is to remove our status as a wiki aiming to completely cover the ''Mario'' franchise. The ''Super Smash Bros.'' series is a crossover of many games: we do not have complete coverage on the characters that are not a part of the general ''Mario'' series, but our [[MarioWiki:Coverage|Coverage Policy]] clearly dictates that we cover crossover games that feature ''Mario'', ''Donkey Kong'', ''Yoshi'', and/or ''Wario'' characters in them. SmashWiki is likely to cover ''Super Smash Bros.'' far more in-depth than we do, and we even link to them in our articles (and will continue to link to them as they are a [[MarioWiki:Nintendo Independent Wiki Alliance|Nintendo Independent Wiki Alliance]] member). There is then no need to remove our coverage, as we do reference a better source for the series throughout our wiki, yet that does not compromise our mission to completely cover our stuff. It has worked fine, and will continue to work fine. | |||
#{{User|Reddragon19k}} I'm going with SMB on this one. If we remove that, it is all gone so, let's keep it there! | |||
#{{User|Walkazo}} - Per SMB. Crossovers count as ''Mario'' games; we have to talk about their non-''Mario'' content as it pertains to those crossover games or we'd be missing valuable information about our series' subjects. We don't write about what goes on in the non-''Mario'' subjects' parent series (that's what interwiki linking and NIWA is for), so that shouldn't be a problem to start with. Organization-wise, I personally don't consider crossovers to be on the same tier as the overall ''Mario'', ''Yoshi'', ''Donkey Kong'' or ''Wario'' series, but the individual crossover series are just as important as the sub-series that come from these "big 4", just as alternate media is as important as games. It doesn't matter if it's a ''Super Smash Bros.'' game or a ''Paper Mario'' game or an episode of ''The Super Mario Bros. Super Show!'': if it involves ''Mario'' content, it's part of ''our'' content. | |||
#{{User|Knife}} – We treat the SSB series just like we do the the other crossover games, which all have their own character articles as well (see: [[Knuckles]] and [[Slime]]). We can't not cover something just because we are affiliated with other wikis that cover the same subjects. | |||
#{{User|Mariomario64}} – Per all. | |||
#{{User|Toad85}} Have you noticed, by chance, that all of the info on the crossover pages deal with the crossovers and crossovers only? We don't cover the series that they came from. Per all. | |||
#{{User|Supremo78}} - I don't know why you haven't noticed, but we cover crossovers like these. | |||
#{{User|M&SG}} - Ditto to all statements above. | |||
#{{User|Mario4Ever}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|GameZone}} Um... this would be saying that we would have to remove Mario's, Dr. Mario's, Luigi's, Peach's, Donkey Kong's, Diddy Kong's, Bowser's, Yoshi's, Wario's, Mr. Game Watch's, and Sonic's Super Smash Bros. information, which all 11 characters are part of this wiki. We would also have remove stage information about (Princess) Peach's Castle, (Super Mario World:) Yoshi's Island(: Yoshi's Story), Kongo Jungle, Mushroom(y) Kingdom (II), Rainbow Cruise, Jungle Japes, Flat Zone (2), Delfino Plaza, Mario Circuit, Rumble Falls, WarioWare Inc., Smashville, PictoChat, Luigi's Mansion, 75m, Mario Bros., and Green Hill Zone, which are also important to this wiki. Oh, and we would have to remove Smash Bros. item info about Bob-ombs, Fire Flowers, Green Shells, Hammers, Red Shells, Starmen, Barrel Cannons, Flippers, Freezies, Metal Boxes, Poison Mushrooms, Super Mushroom, Bike Pieces, Golden Hammers, Hotheads, Lightning, Pitfall Seeds, Soccer Balls, Springs, and Super Scopes, as they are just as important, too. Oh, and, we would have to remove the Smash Bros. information on the Assist Trophies: Hammer Bro., Kat and Ana, Lakitu and Spinies, Little Mac, Nintendog, Shadow the Hedgehog, Stafy, and Waluigi, which are ALSO important to this wiki. So, that "upgrade" would ruin the wiki. If you want to troll, go to the StrategyWiki. | |||
#{{User|Jazama}} Per all | |||
#{{User|Tails777}} This is almost no different than the [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive#DK_Wiki|DK Wiki proposal]] so I'm saying the same thing here that I did on that proposal. Per all here and all the opposers of the DK proposal. | |||
#{{User|DK and Diddy Kong vs Bowser and Bowser Jr.}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|BoygeyMario}} Per all! | |||
#{{User|Propeller Toad}} The Smash Bros. series is a franchise that is directly linked to the Mario Bros. franchise. All of the characters from Smash Bros. have interacted with the Mario characters in the series and thus should be mentioned in this wiki as they have interacted with the Mario series at one or more points of time. | |||
#{{User|Jjrapper100}} Per all. The Smash Bros. series are all Nintendo characters such as Pokemon, Zelda, Samus and more every Smash Bros character are Nintendo and Mario related | |||
#{{User|Geniusguy445}} We're supposed to cover the info that relates to Mario in any way. And as far as I can tell, we've done that. There are even links, I believe, on the crossover articles to where users can get more information on those characters outside SSB. Sooo per all, including those opposing on every other proposal that's cover this same thing. | |||
#{{User|Conanshinichi}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|YoshiGo99}} Per All. | |||
#{{User|Olors}} Per [[Yoshi]]Go99. | |||
#{{User|Chicken}} that is a stupid idea per Goomba's shoe 15 | |||
====Comments==== | |||
Learn to format proposals correctly, please. - {{User|Walkazo}} | |||
'''@SFM:''' What are you talking about? We don't cover Zelda or Pokemon. {{User|Yoshiwaker}} | |||
'''@Yoshiwakerwaker:''' Yes we do. We have character articles for characters from those series. {{User|Smileymiley5001}} | |||
:We have articles for the characters who appear in the SSB games, but covering a series means having extensive information on them, like Bulbapedia and Zeldawiki with Pokemon and Legend of Zelda. {{User|Yoshiwaker}} | |||
'''@GameZone''' we would still cover information that is about Mario in the Smash series we just wouldn't have articles on characters like Ike or Meta Knight we would keep any article that was impacted by or directly from the Mario series. Also this mans not a troll some people do not believe we should cover the Smash Bros. series and he's got every right to propose we don't with out being called a troll just like how we as a wiki have every right to decide we do want to cover the Smash Bros. series with out being called trolls {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} | |||
'''@Leetc''' I will not remove Super Smash Bros. info on Mario characters. I will only remove Super Smash Bros. info on [[Pokemon]] and [[Zelda]]. | |||
{{unsigned|leetc}} | |||
And why? | |||
{{User|DK and Diddy Kong vs Bowser and Bowser Jr.}} | |||
:You know, that's an even worse idea than removing SSB from our coverage. If we're going to cover SSB in the character articles, we'd then make the game article, then we'd make articles for the other playable characters. {{User|Yoshiwaker}} | |||
I'm going to quote this comment: | |||
'''@Leetc''' I will not remove Super Smash Bros. info on Mario characters. I will only remove Super Smash Bros. info on [[Pokemon]] and [[Zelda]]. | |||
Well that just made this proposal look even worse. You won't remove Metroid series games info, Pikmin info, and F-Zero info. That's very inconsistent. {{User|Supremo78}} | |||
@Chicken: You don't have to make fun of leetc's idea. He's just trying to express his ideas and you're bringing him down. Shorten it to "per Goomba's Shoe 15" or whatever. {{User|Magikrazy51}} | |||
The fact still remains that Pokémon and Zelda are in a game that includes the Mario Universe. As a result, we are allowed to have information about their Smash Bros. involvement at the Mario Wiki. Remember, we do cover crossovers and cameos, but we do not cover series' that don't involve Mario, Donkey Kong, Yoshi, or Wario. {{User|M&SG}} | |||
@ Yoshiwaker I meant the smash bros. info. {{unsigned|Superfiremario}} | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 12:41, August 20, 2011
Recipe ImagesLEAVE AS IS 3-7 I've noticed an inconcistency with the images for the recipes. You can even look now at many of them. Many of them are quite alike, but they are different to the others alike. This has caused not only constant headaches with users like myself, but also more work for every user to do. Just go to here and notice how each image is [[File:PaperMario Items <itemname>.png]] for the most part (as some are like .gif and .jpg). This is a great example - for the most part - of what I am talking about. Now go to here or here, and notice how many images are like [[File:<itemname> PM2.png/PNG]], [[File:<itemname>TTYD.png/PNG]], [[File:<nameitem>TTYD.png/PNG]], [[File:<itemnickname>.png/PNG]], [[File:<itemname> SPM.png/PNG]], and then even images for items that are used for more than one game because there isn't a image found! My point I'm trying to come across is that many of our pages have had major work done on them because of this inconsistency, as well as editing them now being a major pain-in-the-neck. Changing them to something that will work out for all of them ([[File:PaperMario Items <itemname>.png]], [[File:<itemname> PM2.png]], and [[File:<itemname> SPM.png]] are what the ideal file names would be), we'll be able to create these pages more efficently, as well as editing further pages be a lot more smoother and less time-consuming. As an example, this is more efficent way of making images easier, as the template already holds the key factors ([[File:PaperMario Items <itemname>.png]]) in it, which would allow the editor just to simply put in the item name. And for the pages that don't use that template, it will still allow easier editing since they would have to only put the key factors and the item name instead of looking up the image and copying it into a page. The downside to all of this is that many of the pages already having these mix-matched file names would need to be fixed and updated to the latest things. Hopefully it won't take much time, and I already have it planned to quickly update each page before it ends up as a project that will take more than a few days. If the proposal pass, I'll start immediately on working, and hopefully have some help to get it down. That is the only downside I can see to this passing afaik. Even if it takes some work, it is better to have consistency then have all this annoying work done if it could be much simplier. Template:Scrollbox Remove Staff PagesKEEP PAGES 2-16 The title explains it all. I feel that the staff pages for the games are not needed in the fact that they are not really about "Mario" himself. We talk about Mario here, not about the people who made the games. People who play the games can know who made the game and all of that kind of stuff. But when we're talking about Mario on the Super Mario Wiki, these staff pages have no business being created. Template:Scrollbox Merge all Donkey Kong sidebar lists with Mario listsMERGE DONKEY KONG LISTS 10-3 This proposal started off as a TPP, which I said the list of Donkey Kong bosses with the Mario bosses list. Goomba's Shoe15 than told me in the comments that we need to merge all other Donkey Kong lists to prevent inconsistency. I liked the idea, and then created this proposal. EDIT: Just to clear up some confusion, I mean the side bar lists such as, Games, Characters, Allies, etc. I don't want to merge the categories. Template:Scrollbox Remove Logos from Infobox TitlesREMOVE 17-4 Quite a few games have logos instead of plain text for their infobox titles, but seeing as the game boxart also contains the logo and is located directly beneath the title, all this really does is show us the exact same graphic twice. This is redundant, and it looks sloppy, especially when the logos are transparent and the background colour interferes with the words. It's also inconsistent, since most games just use good ol' fashioned text. Compare Mario Kart DS with Mario Kart: Double Dash!! - there's no question as to which one looks more professional, and by extension, which style we should use. Other games using the superfluous title-logos include Super Mario Sunshine, Super Mario Galaxy, all three Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games titles, Mario Party 8, Mario Kart Wii and both Super Smash Bros. Melee and Brawl, among others. Then you have the occasional character page with a title-logo, which is completely unnecessary. The only time it makes sense to have logos is for series pages, since a single boxart isn't adequately representative of all the games involved. Some example of this logo usage are Super Smash Bros. (series), Mario Party (series), and Mario Kart (series) (compare with Mario Kart DS), but even then, the logos are being used as the infobox images, not the titles. And, while the consoles don't really the logos in their images, the transparency issue is still a problem, and the inconsistency with other types of pages is also undesirable, so it'd be better of the logos were simply used elsewhere. In short, I propose we remove all instances where the logos are being used for the infobox titles. The logos can be put into the galleries (or incorporated into the body text, as is the case with the character and console pages), so nothing is being lost. Series pages with logos being used as their images will not be affected. Artwork Transparency IssuesREMOVE BAD TRANSPARENT IMAGES 25-20 During the past set of months, I've been noticing that a good number of JPEG artworks were being replaced by PNG artworks with transparent backgrounds. However, a lot of those images look quite ugly when they're viewed in backgrounds that aren't colored white. I've mentioned this dilemma at the admins boards, and some of the Sysops there do agree with my statement. I propose that any artworks with ugly-looking transparency has to lose the transparency. After all, we shouldn't be modifying the artworks by any means; if the artworks are JPEGs, upload them as JPEGs; if the PNG artworks don't have anything transparent, upload them that way. Update: To understand what's going on, please look here for examples of good transparency and bad transparency. Template:Scrollbox Merge the non-game lists on the side bar with the video game listsMERGE SIDEBAR LISTS 8-0 I find it very weird that this wiki considers the non-game elements canon but still keeps them separate on the side bar so i think we should merge the two lists together because if everything is official/canon than they should be on the same list. Because right now the two lists separates the game and non-game elements on these lists and i don't think we should do that. Plus we already merged all of the non-game categories so i think it only makes sense to merge the lists two Template:Scrollbox Reform MarioWiki:ProposalsLEAVE AS IS 11-20 As two old users, we jointly feel that the decision-making system pre-MarioWiki:Proposals was superior to the current system. The current system of MarioWiki:Proposals is based upon popularity contests. The previous system involved discussion on the Community Portal and Talk:Main page. This new proposal would restore any potential problems to be discussed on Talk:Main page, not with "support" and "oppose" columns, but genuine ”bona fide” arguments and discussion. When consensus has been reached, the fate of the "proposal" will be decided. This was the way the system worked before the infamous and perfidious troll A Link to the Past (talk) tricked Porplemontage (talk) and Wayoshi (talk) into creating the proposals (only after his disastrous MarioWiki:Peer Review scheme had failed; Proposals were made largely as a concession to his whining). If this measure passes, it shall go into force July 17, 2011, although any Proposals that still need to expire will be left to expire at their natural time. EDIT: MarioWiki:Proposals will still serve as the main place for talk page proposals. Many thanks to Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) for bringing that up. MLA FormatLEAVE AS IS 2-13 All articles should be written with the most updated version of MLA Format. This will help in the eternal preservation of always citing your sources. Cover Mario KnockoffsDON'T COVER 1-20 The Super Mario Wiki is a place where everything Mario should be covered. I have checked and we have done well. However, we have only covered the licensed things (as far as I know). The unlicensed things have not been touched. I am talking about knockoff games. Games like Mobario, the mobile "Mario" game for phones and the Great Giana Sisters, the peculiar platform game about two punk girls named Giana and Maria. Since we are the Mario wiki, we should cover everything Mario, licensed or not. Change the Gallery pages' names from "Gallery:(page name)" to "(page name)/Gallery"LEAVE AS IS 0-20 The Gallery pages will look better if are labeled as the glitches, beta elements and staff ones. They look different by their names. DK WikiLEAVE AS IS 7-44 Well, I think that there shouldn't be Donkey Kong things here. Why? Beacause its caled Super MARIO wiki, not Super MARIO AND DONKEY KONG Wiki! Right? Yeah, thats right! Another wiki could be made, and it just needs ALOT of copy and pasting. Here, look: New rule for imagesLEAVE AS IS 1-19 As you can see, the PNGs have better quality than JPGs. And I've seen some good quality PNG artwork get replaced with JPGs with worse quality & I think it's best to have images with the best possible quality. So I suggest that we add a new rule. The rule is that we don't allow PNG artwork to be converted to JPGs so that the quality of the images are better. Delete the FollowingDO NOT DELETE 0-21
All these pages are rather hidden and very unneeded; for example, the troll page is unnecessary because users will figure out what is a troll if they never heard of one, I have. I stumble across all these pages when I typed down in the search "How can I be an admin?" and it was in a pile of search results, AFTER I tweak the search options a bit. I suggest to copy, paste, and alter the information into Userpedia. A few of those pages have a list of questions, so in this proposal, it proposes to move those questions to the FAQ page. A few of them have a link to the list of current admins, sysops, bureaucrats, etc. I propose to move those links into the welcome letter every user now gets for easy access just in case of a situation of sorts. Note: For all you opposers, what do you propose to do with these pages about the part that they are hidden? PerrowDELETED In a lot of galleries, people use "<perrow>" Some of the use is necessary because the gallery section has 30+ pictures. Most of it is used for sections with less than fifteen pictures. I think we should make a new rule. This rule would be called "Perrow". Perrow
Reality vs. FictionREMOVE GENERIC ITEMS THAT DO NOT DIFFERENTIATE FROM THEIR REAL WORLD COUNTERPARTS 40-0 I was going to make this a Writing Guideline, but I figured I'd get some approval via proposal before I created my draft. A new trend on the wiki is to create articles on generic objects, like Tennis Ball, Basketball Hoop, and Cage. The main problem with this is where does it stop? Allowing these articles could be precedent for a number of useless generic articles being created, such as Template:Fakelink, Template:Fakelink, Template:Fakelink, etc.. MarioWiki is also not a dictionary. We don't need articles on real world objects. I believe we should set a restriction for which of these generic articles can and can't be created. We should only allow articles on generic subjects that have a function which is different from the real world counterpart. Examples of generic object articles that would be allowed:
Examples of generic object articles that would not be allowed:
If this proposal passes I will move on to my next step, creating a Writing Guideline concerning this. Using Another Country's BoxartDO NOT USE ONLY AMERICAN BOX ARTS 3-31 As you can see, many articles such as (New Super Mario Bros. Wii, Mario Smash Football, Mario Strikers Charged Football) and many more game articles are using other country's boxart and naming them as in that country such as Mario Strikers Charged Football even though in America we call it (Mario Strikers Charged) No Football I understand that the first English country goes first but I think we should make it the American verison instead and am not saying that we take off all the information from another country but just to change the name of the game by the American verison and change the boxart of the game to the American verison only not much more if possible. SmashWikiLEAVE AS IS 4-26 Since the game Super Smash Bros. has a similar name with Super Mario Bros., people thought it was a Mario title. So people created a Super Smash Bros. page on MarioWiki. Then someone created a number of useless articles such as Zelda and Lucario. MarioWiki should not have articles about Pokemon and Zelda, that is the work of Bulbapedia and ZeldaWiki. There is even a SmashWiki to hold Super Smash Bros. information. All of the info in MarioWiki on Super Smash Bros. should be about Mario characters only. We should remove all Pokemon and Zelda articles. |