Talk:Hotel Mario: Difference between revisions
m (→Wikipedia?: we're removing the template, so no more link) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Ooh 4 fingers! {{User:Birdoshi/sig}} | Ooh 4 fingers! {{User:Birdoshi/sig}} | ||
== Wikipedia? == | ==Wikipedia?== | ||
This article looks exactly like the one on Wikipedia. [[Image:Luigidance.gif]][[User:Luigifan123|Luigifan123]][[Image:Luigi parade.png]] | This article looks exactly like the one on Wikipedia. [[Image:Luigidance.gif]][[User:Luigifan123|Luigifan123]][[Image:Luigi parade.png]] | ||
:That's called a | :That's called a Wikidump. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 22:46, 25 February 2009 (EST) | ||
Oh, thanks for telling me. [[Image:Luigidance.gif]][[User:Luigifan123|Luigifan123]][[Image:Luigi parade.png]] | Oh, thanks for telling me. [[Image:Luigidance.gif]][[User:Luigifan123|Luigifan123]][[Image:Luigi parade.png]] | ||
Revision as of 12:59, May 24, 2011
Poor voice acting and bizarre format?
Is that not an opinion? MamaWaluigi 16:29, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
Critic opinion.Knife (talk) 16:35, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
Well ,it is. But it's the general consencus. Gofer
- Not really. Why, then, is it used in Youtube Poop, then? MamaWaluigi 13:58, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
I'm pretty sure that's exactly why it's used in YouTube Poop.
— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hammerthingys42 (talk).
Regardless, critic opinions should be properly referenced with reference tags. Stumpers! 18:24, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
Wikipedia?
This article looks exactly like the one on Wikipedia. 
Luigifan123
Oh, thanks for telling me. Luigifan123
Credits
Are the credits really necessary?
Ralphfan>>Waste of space, in my opinion.
Sorry to bring up this tired debate but...
Mark Graue acknowledge the existence of Youtube Poops, albeit indirectly:
"I think it’s very cool ( and flattering ) that something that was recorded in 1993 has found new life on [YouTube videos that are using Mario & Luigi’s voice for their comedic video collages]."
So yeah, thoughts?--Blitzwing 18:07, 20 April 2009 (EDT)
- This is very interesting. Not only should Marc have his own aticle me thinks, but maybe a reference of Youtube Poops somewhere in the wiki would be nice. Anyone agree?
Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)·
- Yes, also i must agree Castle Toad (talk)
Copyright?
"It is illegal to make unauthorized copies of this software. Duplication of this software for any reason including sale, loan, rental, or gift is a crime. Penalties include fines of up to $50,000.00 and jail terms up to 5 years."
Wouldn't all YouTube poopers be breaking the law then? I'm a youtube pooper myself so someone please say no!
Check my YouTube Channel: In the House Productions
— The preceding unsigned comment was added by MamaLuigiDinner (talk).
- All YouTube poopers of THAT software would be, yes. If you're not using that software, just let the violators get on with it. Also, please ~~~~ after your comment.--Launchballer 16:07, 24 May 2010 (EDT)
