View source for User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy/Archive 6

==Congrats==
I pulled an all-nighter doing mind-numbing editing, so I won't get any sleep the last 48 hours until tonight. I'll mentally imagine how we should start, then I'll begin tomorrow afternoon. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 18:09, 1 December 2009 (EST)

== ...?!?!?! (again...) ==

No offense, FD09, but it seems like you're undoing my edits every time, even though I'm trying to do my job keeping the articles in check (recently the Mona page), while still keeping important/accurate details on there. Are you saying that I'm doing it in the wrong way (or am I missing something because it's like you're saying I'm not working with you and/or others here)? Because you're telling me that if there's plenty of acceptable content, it should be "permanent" on the pages. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 13:11, 2 December 2009 (EST) I too don't want to deal with edit wars (definitely a no-no from the sysop end), but this has gotten really personal to me, not to mention this has got me really baffled. o_O

: AHA! It just hit me. This tells me I can't really "overrule" anything at all if the info inserted into articles and such was seriously worth mentioning (except removing small stuff that's "useless/obvious info")...? So, you're saying that you "overrulled" past edits of mine on articles recently because there wasn't any strong reasoning for doing so and/or my actions doing nothing but taking away the reader's interest! This leads me to conclude that you and some other are saying "red flag" on those edit actions of mine on certain articles. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 19:36, 2 December 2009 (EST)

== A question ==

Hello, FD. This question may seem out of the blue, but it's kind of important, since I'm working on a wiki maintenance/activity report. I was wondering if you had anyone you know from real life is a member of the MarioWiki? You see, I'm trying to categorize users by how many edits they make, which articles they work on the most, the average size (in bytes) of their contributions, how much part they take in the community, who goes on chat, who has siblings or friends on the wiki (and in extension, how many of those are known from real life), an estimated time spent online for each person, how long they've been a member, etc. I've already asked all the Sysops that I can contact on the forum, and I now intend to start out with the "largest contributors" to the site that don't have Administrative powers. I realize this may sound a little silly, but it's strictly for maintenance. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 22:45, 6 December 2009 (EST)
:Excellent! Thanks for your cooperation. =) {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 00:05, 12 December 2009 (EST)

==''My'' point==
The manual. I'm sure of it. {{User:Reversinator/sig}}

[link removed due to spam protection Here's your proof.] {{User:Reversinator/sig}}

== Okay, what's going on...? ==

Okay, I need to find out why you "reverted" my edit in regards to the "main athletic outfit" comparions on Daisy's articles. The focus was still on Daisy, but that added note about Peach's having that same design as Daisy (except for the "accesories"/"elements") was still beneficial; the "details" on Peach's athletic outfit itself would be on her page (which it already is). --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 17:37, 24 January 2010 (EST)

== Hmm... that picture looks familiar... ==

Wasn't [http://www.mariowiki.com/Image:DaisySlamBasket.png  this picture] the one that I uploaded almost one to two years ago...? --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 21:02, 30 January 2010 (EST)

: Yes, I remember -- it was from one of Nintendo of America's wallpapers for ''Mario Hoops 3-on-3''. Still bummed that we were force to cut that Daisy art out from that wallpaper in question so that we can place it here. >_> I assume you have that said wallpaper in question too? --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 21:30, 30 January 2010 (EST)

:: YOU DID?!?!? Was it in the same size as the "wallpaper" (length wise)? --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 21:35, 30 January 2010 (EST)

==Re: UHM==
The section provides information; is there a rule that says articles cannot have such a section? --{{User|Garlic Man}} (Basically, we shouldn't make big actions based on one man's opinion; at the moment, you are the only one in support of removing the section)
:We should still gather third opinions before doing such things. --{{User|Garlic Man}}

== Reminder ==

{{Reminder|2=removing sections from pages without authorization}}
:I see you removed Codec Conversations from many Brawl character's pages. Please make sure that you have permission via the staff or a community-approved proposal the next time you want to remove content like you did. {{User:Super Mario Bros./sig}} 17:27, 31 January 2010 (EST)
::So you're saying if information on one article is on another, it should be deleted? Then how about emptying [[Mario]]? {{User:Reversinator/sig}}

:::I agree with FD09. We'd have to put all the quotes from [[List of Quotes in Luigi's Mansion]] into corresponding character's articles articles. Imagine doing it for E. Gadd! Why bother when there is an article for that already.--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}}
::::@Gamefreak: Well, it doesn't hurt to do it, and besides, we did it with lots of other characters.
::::@FD09: All right, let me be serious. I know there's a difference, but the information ''was'' directed to the character. And if it all went on Snake's page, it would be sloppy and unorganized. {{User:Reversinator/sig}}

::::::Ahh, you just contradicted your self, Reverse. Did you take a gander at how many quotes E. Gadd has in just Luigi's MAnsion alone. That is not even half of it! His page would be so sloppy!--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}}

== I am.........confused? ==

So, pretty much your trying to say in your proposal is that such as though in a game that such as SMG, that during one of Rosalina's Stories, that they say it in the paragragh: "And, if you notice, the background of the page is a light blue color." Or, am I getting it wrong again? I don't want to see me getting another misconfused vote again on the proposal... {{User:Baby Mario Bloops/sig}}


== Okay, what's going on... again...? ==

Yeah, the Princess Daisy article again -- I'm curious to know (as well as others, possibly), in the gallery section of the main page of it -- it's like you're telling us that the majority of pictures for both screenshots/artworks category should focus on the "current" Daisy? I was mainly targeting a few pictures of the "classic" Daisy (especially in the artworks section) to start the galleries (especially the "debut" art of Daisy herself), while ending the sections with the "current" Daisy we have now. No offense, but it looks like you're saying that you're the only one that can deal with the Daisy article itself since I you're reverting edits that you deem are unsatisfactory (except those in which we both agree are nothing but childish/vandalizing attemps). Once again, nothing personal. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 01:30, 5 February 2010 (EST)

: Panchito? Hmm... show me where you had this conversation with him -- because there was a dispute on my talk page regarding "afterward"/"afterwards", which was basically the same word. And am I also to conclude that hi-quality images have priority in the "gallery" of main articles...?!?! o_O --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 17:17, 5 February 2010 (EST)

== Re:So ==

Nope. {{User:Twentytwofiftyseven/sig}} 21:11, 7 February 2010 (EST)

Do you want more? {{User:Twentytwofiftyseven/sig}} 21:22, 7 February 2010 (EST)

Alright. {{User:Twentytwofiftyseven/sig}} 21:27, 7 February 2010 (EST)

== Well... ==

Really, there's just some grammar errors throughout the article. They probably aren't too many more left, though. I myself actually think it's a very nice article. {{User:Fawfulfury65/sig}}

== Sry but I can't ==

I'd like to help but I don't know so much to talk about her in the article. I'd rather use a few words to develop such extense article, but it seems you like to add sometimes details on every thing, such as her dressing and physical appearance for example. The other reason is that I'm not very active by now because I'm in the University and I'm preparing for mid-term exams that will come in a couple of weeks! --{{User:Coincollector/sig}}

== Unfeaturing ==

Considering the unfeature page was already blown up when I returned to it today (which I consider completely unfair to our regular users, but that's a different story), I would like to point out that we definitely don't just go for the Princess Daisy article alone. We want to check other characters' articles that have feature status and try to validate whether they are worthy or not. I just started with the Daisy article because I came across some bad sections that have since been fixed. We just can't do it all at once. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 08:52, 8 February 2010 (EST)

==Image==
[[Image:Daisy Super Mario Land.gif|thumb]]
[[Image:DaisySML.gif|thumb|left]]The image to the left, have you edited it from its original look? Because by looking at the history, anybody can plainly see that there's been lots of changes to the image by you. On the talk page, Grandy showed us that the image to the right is the true one. {{User:Reversinator/sig}}
:Oh. Alright. {{User:Reversinator/sig}}

== Koopalings ==

The page of Bowser Jr. says "Prince Bowser Koopa Junior", as it is the child of Bowser. so I wanted to insert the word "prince" by the other children of Bowser. (I'm sorry for my bad english) --[[User:Mikiuz|Mikiuz]] 01:07, 10 February 2010 (EST)

== INSANE! ==

Where did you find that "size update" for the Daisy art (profile) for Mario Party 6? And do you have the "original coloring" by any chance? --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 21:32, 13 February 2010 (EST)

==Re: What?==
I never simply cut pictures from a big image with background. Images (like that Yoshi image or the Star Coin image) are released as character artwork or object artwork on the official [[New Super Mario Bros. Wii]] website or manual. These images are fully legged if you ask me; the only thing is these images don't have a white background. 
There is really no problem with these images. They are uploaded months ago and nobody (including sysops) ever made a problem of it. 
{{User:Arend/Sig}}

==Whoops?==
<blockquote>Sorry about the page looking terrible when I remade from the redirect page, I don't really know about the Yoshi's Island games too much and I using some of the information from the Orange Yoshi page. {{User:Super Mario Bros./sig}}</blockquote>
You put this on [[Talk:Green Yoshi]]. Where does that come from? {{User:Time Q/sig}} 06:38, 5 March 2010 (EST)
:I'm talking about [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Green_Yoshi&diff=727009&oldid=722668 this edit] where you added not only your talk page proposal, but also the comment I cited above with [[User:Super Mario Bros.|Super Mario Bros.]]'s sig attached to it under the header "Whoops...". I'd like to know where that comment comes from. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 16:23, 5 March 2010 (EST)
::Okay. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 06:16, 6 March 2010 (EST)

==Re: Category==
The categories in question were not only removed from Princess Daisy's page, but from all pages they were on, because said categories needed to be deleted. I thought you'd prefer to not have ugly red category items at the bottom of the Daisy article. - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 12:23, 14 March 2010 (EDT)
:Neither was I. - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 07:41, 15 March 2010 (EDT)

== eh... What are you doing this time...? ==

I see you're retouching the Daisy pics, just because to show the fact she's ginger or she has an orange hair? I don't know, but you has made her to look weird and a bit unofficial all the artwork... -_- {{User:Coincollector/sig}}

:OK I realised of that. Sorry for being indiscreet. Just take that comment that nobody would interest to note such differences just for being a dedicated fan. {{User:Coincollector/sig}}

::I already told you. Nintendo is not always 100% exact when releases official information. NNOA can say something different to what NOJapan could say. That's the reason of these inconsistenses :/ {{User:Coincollector/sig}}
== Hye ==
So you like Daisy.... cool. She's my #2 character in the whole franchise. She rocks.
[[User:Luigirockz|Luigi]][[User talk:Luigirockz|rockz]]
:You are very right :D

==Discussion==
There was nobody else on when you deleted it! At least wait a full day, not an hour! '''''Reversinator'''''

== RE: Little Help ==

Hey, I know you were directing that question at Lindayoris15, but I believe I can answer that question for you -- if you're talking about the REALLY HUGE resolutions (actual resolutions), I didn't see or hear news about that version of that Wendy NSMB Wii art surfacing. All she found was the 1280 x 1280 version (the "internet standard") which she uploaded to these parts for use on articles here on the Wiki. Hope that answers everything. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 12:53, 29 March 2010 (EDT)

== The Peach/Daisy Art for Mario Sports Mix ==

Hey there, I'm curious to find out -- where were you able to find [http://www.mariowiki.com/images/thumb/0/09/MSMart2.png/97px-MSMart2.png  this version of said art] by any chance? I've been searching the 'net, and it seems like that picture you uploaded was VERY elusive to me. >_> --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 17:43, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

: Urgh... I linked to the stored THUMBNAIL version of the pic. I really meant [http://www.mariowiki.com/images/0/09/MSMart2.png  this]. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 00:45, 24 June 2010 (UTC)