Template talk:Move
Adjust the talk page link parameter[edit]
This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal. |
adjust parameter 10-0
This is something I was wondering for a while. Currently, when you place this template on a page, the (discuss) part of it links to the talk page as a whole. In certain cases, such as my current proposal on Flower (Super Mario Land), it would be helpful if the discuss link lead to a particular section if the subject of discussion is further down (the flower example is probably a bad one, since it's only the second section, but it's the only one coming to mind at the moment). Was thinking the parameter would instead look like this:
<div class="notice-template" style="text-align:justified;background:#E0D2EA;margin:.5em 2%;padding:0 1em;border:1px solid #636;color:black"> It has been suggested that this page be moved to '''{{fake link|{{{1}}}}}'''. {{#if:{{{2|}}}|([[:{{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{PAGENAME}}#{{{2}}}|discuss]])|([[:{{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{PAGENAME}}|discuss]])}} </div>
For example, typing {{Rename|Super Flower|Rename to Super Flower or Superball Flower}} will link directly to that section, and not including the second parameter will link to the talk page as a whole. The second parameter already takes into account the hashtag, so it only needs the section header.
Proposer: Alex95 (talk)
Deadline: November 8th, 2017, 23:59 GMT
Support[edit]
- Alex95 (talk) - I feel like this will be useful.
- 7feetunder (talk) Per proposal.
- Ultimate Mr. L (talk) The whole point is for the reader to vote on the proposal, so why not actually link to the proposal itself? I was confused the fist time I clicked a link in this template.
- Toadette the Achiever (talk) Should be common sense, per all.
- TheFlameChomp (talk) Per all.
- Niiue (talk) Per all.
- Yoshi the SSM (talk) Per all.
- Lcrossmk8 (talk) Per all. I thought this would get mass support from the population.
- LuigiMaster123 (talk) - Per all.
- BBQ Turtle (talk) Only seems logical, per all.