Editing Template talk:Imagecategory-reminder

== Protect ==
Shouldn't this template be protected, it's an important notice template and all other templates [[Template:Aboutfile-reminder|like]] [[Template:Block|this]] are protected anyway. {{User:The RPG Gamer/sig}} 17:28, 10 October 2016 (EDT)
:Tweaks are underway. It's easier to keep unprotected for now. It might be protected when it is finalized. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 15:40, 23 October 2016 (EDT)

== To Include ==
*[[:Category:Ending Scene Images|Ending Scene Images]]
*[[:Category:Opening Screen Images|Opening Screen Images]]
*[[:Category:Title Screen Images|Title Screen Images]]
*[[:Category:Pre-release and unused content images|Pre-release and unused content images]]
*[[:Category:Glitch Images|Glitch Images]]
*[[:Category:Merchandise Images|Merchandise Images]]
*[[:Category:Amiibo Images|Amiibo Images]]
Here's a list that isn't limited to these categories that aren't included in the template. How should these be mentioned, if at all? --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 15:45, 23 October 2016 (EDT)

:Adding those entries would make the template's contents too large and overwhelming. It should remain as simple and informative as possible. I think that the template should be for repeated overall absence of media-specific categories, like games and television shows. Things like glitch and title screen images are too specific for a broad template like this, and users should be individually instructed as these certain situations come up.

:{{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 15:56, 23 October 2016 (EDT)
::What about a table to have the contents be horizontal to use up the white space? Like [[User:Wildgoosespeeder/Template:ImageCategorization-reminder|this]]. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 16:00, 23 October 2016 (EDT)

== Curious ==

Are there any reason to having [[:Category:Media by company|Media by company]], [[:Category:Media by film|Media by film]], [[:Category:Media by merchandise|Media by merchandise]], [[:Category:Media by publication|Media by publication]], and [[:Category:Media by website|Media by website]] be listed under '''Audio/Video Files''' despite being redlinks? For what I understand, I doubt there are any media files for a publication or a merchandise. {{User:PanchamBro/sig}} 22:23, June 17, 2021 (EDT)
Latest revision		Your text
Line 20:		Line 20:
	== Curious ==		== Curious ==

	Are there any reason to having [[:Category:Media ~~files~~ by company\|Media ~~files~~ by company]], [[:Category:Media ~~files~~ by film\|Media ~~files~~ by film]], [[:Category:Media ~~files~~ by merchandise\|Media ~~files~~ by merchandise]], [[:Category:Media ~~files~~ by publication\|Media ~~files~~ by publication]], and [[:Category:Media ~~files~~ by website\|Media ~~files~~ by website]] be listed under '''Audio/Video Files''' despite being redlinks? For what I understand, I doubt there are any media files for a publication or a merchandise. {{User:PanchamBro/sig}} 22:23, June 17, 2021 (EDT)		Are there any reason to having [[:Category:Media by company\|Media by company]], [[:Category:Media by film\|Media by film]], [[:Category:Media by merchandise\|Media by merchandise]], [[:Category:Media by publication\|Media by publication]], and [[:Category:Media by website\|Media by website]] be listed under '''Audio/Video Files''' despite being redlinks? For what I understand, I doubt there are any media files for a publication or a merchandise. {{User:PanchamBro/sig}} 22:23, June 17, 2021 (EDT)