Editing Template talk:Foreign names
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 555: | Line 555: | ||
:I agree the implementation of the proposal has been mixed. How would you recommend we proceed? I personally remain most interested in a citation policy for enemies, places, items, objects, and characters, but I think it is less necessary for things like physical video games, modes, minigames, and extremely recurring characters like Mario or Donkey Kong. It may also not be necessary for subjects that debuted in the Nintendo Switch-era onward due to the accessibility of alternative languages, which would include things like NPCs from ''Princess Peach Showtime!'' - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 13:47, September 6, 2024 (EDT) | :I agree the implementation of the proposal has been mixed. How would you recommend we proceed? I personally remain most interested in a citation policy for enemies, places, items, objects, and characters, but I think it is less necessary for things like physical video games, modes, minigames, and extremely recurring characters like Mario or Donkey Kong. It may also not be necessary for subjects that debuted in the Nintendo Switch-era onward due to the accessibility of alternative languages, which would include things like NPCs from ''Princess Peach Showtime!'' - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 13:47, September 6, 2024 (EDT) | ||
::I support going forward with the entrenched, tried-and-true practices the wiki had prior to the proposal's passing. Sources should generally only be cited when they are obscure or volatile, but can safely forgo any explicit mention when concerning names shown or disseminated plainly in a work. Being a human- and community-driven encyclopedia, mistakes and falsehoods are bound to occur, and the best remedy against those errors is to stay vigilant and nip them. A total and drastic makeover, especially one as controversial as this one, begets a lot of other problems, which renders it an improper solution to this ever-waging battle against misinformation. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 14:10, September 6, 2024 (EDT) | ::I support going forward with the entrenched, tried-and-true practices the wiki had prior to the proposal's passing. Sources should generally only be cited when they are obscure or volatile, but can safely forgo any explicit mention when concerning names shown or disseminated plainly in a work. Being a human- and community-driven encyclopedia, mistakes and falsehoods are bound to occur, and the best remedy against those errors is to stay vigilant and nip them. A total and drastic makeover, especially one as controversial as this one, begets a lot of other problems, which renders it an improper solution to this ever-waging battle against misinformation. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 14:10, September 6, 2024 (EDT) | ||
:::I get what you are saying. Personally, even as someone who supported the proposal, I was unsure why we needed an infrastructural overhaul to execute it, and I do not think that is necessarily what {{@|Technetium}} (who is welcomed to clarify that himself if he wishes) or other users had in mind. I envisioned foreign names just being cited the same way we cite material in the body paragraphs, with the actual result of the proposal being more like a policy revision where users are explicitly encouraged to cite foreign names - putting words to what you | :::I get what you are saying. Personally, even as someone who supported the proposal, I was unsure why we needed an infrastructural overhaul to execute it, and I do not think that is necessarily what {{@|Technetium}} (who is welcomed to clarify that himself if he wishes) or other users had in mind. I envisioned foreign names just being cited the same way we cite material in the body paragraphs, with the actual result of the proposal being more like a policy revision where users are explicitly encouraged to cite foreign names - putting words to what you or less describe. Users would be encouraged to act on it as they come across uncited foreign names. | ||
:::But that is me, and others are welcomed to think differently. But regardless, I probably should scrutinized the original proposal a bit better, because it seems like some users, both in support and opposition, had different expectations with what would happen when it was executed. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 14:31, September 6, 2024 (EDT) | :::But that is me, and others are welcomed to think differently. But regardless, I probably should scrutinized the original proposal a bit better, because it seems like some users, both in support and opposition, had different expectations with what would happen when it was executed. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 14:31, September 6, 2024 (EDT) | ||
::::I definitely did not think through this fully when I made the proposal (which is 100% my bad and I should've waited to make it), and I just suggested maybe doing something with the template afterwards only for changes to be put in place without any discussion (which I was aiming to start with my message above). I do admittedly like the template changes because it tracks which pages need specifically name citations. But I can also see how users adding citations whenever they stumble across a page without them and ditching all this extra stuff could be a better idea. I do want a tag for any edits adding new names without citations, though, as my hope was that any new names added would be cited by the original editor. [[User:Technetium|Technetium]] ([[User talk:Technetium|talk]]) 14:35, September 6, 2024 (EDT) | ::::I definitely did not think through this fully when I made the proposal (which is 100% my bad and I should've waited to make it), and I just suggested maybe doing something with the template afterwards only for changes to be put in place without any discussion (which I was aiming to start with my message above). I do admittedly like the template changes because it tracks which pages need specifically name citations. But I can also see how users adding citations whenever they stumble across a page without them and ditching all this extra stuff could be a better idea. I do want a tag for any edits adding new names without citations, though, as my hope was that any new names added would be cited by the original editor. [[User:Technetium|Technetium]] ([[User talk:Technetium|talk]]) 14:35, September 6, 2024 (EDT) |