Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {{partofpipe|image=[[Image:Ssbemblem.png|32px]]|type=article|name=Super Smash Bros.|goal=improve upon the articles about the [[Super Smash Bros. (series)|Super Smash Bros. Series]]}} |
| You can's just copy to wikipedia site. There are templates and categories that do not apply to the Mario Wiki. --[[User:Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] 18:33, 11 May 2006 (EDT) | | You can's just copy to wikipedia site. There are templates and categories that do not apply to the Mario Wiki. --[[User:Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] 18:33, 11 May 2006 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
Line 16: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| {{user:Dry Bones/sig|Hmmm...}} | | {{user:Dry Bones/sig|Hmmm...}} |
| | In order for you to get Luigi (Who is my favorite character!) you have to do one of the following: beat classic mode without using a continue, participate in 22 matches to get challenged by him in [[Luigi's Mansion (place)|his mansion]], or you could play through story mode until you get to the first subspace level, if you are confused just use this link: [[Super Smash Bros. Brawl]] {{User|Loxo}} |
|
| |
|
| == Purpose of this page == | | == Purpose of this page == |
Line 54: |
Line 56: |
| Why is Giga Bowser listed as returning as non-playable in Brawl? Dark Link was removed because he is now "playable". (see [[Talk:Super Smash Bros. (series)#Dark Link??|this]]. --[[User:Gowser|Gowser]] 09:41, 17 November 2007 (EST) | | Why is Giga Bowser listed as returning as non-playable in Brawl? Dark Link was removed because he is now "playable". (see [[Talk:Super Smash Bros. (series)#Dark Link??|this]]. --[[User:Gowser|Gowser]] 09:41, 17 November 2007 (EST) |
|
| |
|
| == Maybe == | | == Mabey == |
| Hey maybe the artical is just there as a shortcut page, I mean just think about it. [[User:Gamer2.1]] | | Hey mabey the artical is just there as a shortcut page, I mean just think about it. [[User:Gamer2.1]] |
| ==Super Smash Bros. for Wii U and 3DS==
| |
| We had <span class=plainlinks>[{{fullurl:Super Mario 3D|oldid=942493}} Super Mario]</span> article when there was only a mention about it by Miyamoto, why don't we have one for SSB(WU3DS)? {{User:SWFlash/Sig}}
| |
| :I was about to ask the same thing myself. Wikipedia has an article now. [[User:Magikrazy51|The Magikrazy]]. BTW, Nintendo has been thinking of putting in Capcom characters (Mega Man? Ryu?). In the meantime, I will check Halopedia, our partner, for articles on Halo 4, 5 and 6.
| |
| :::I just thinking that shall we create a separate article of the upcoming Smash Bros. game for the Wii U and 3DS? '''[[User:McAusten]]!''' '''·''' [[User talk:McAusten|talk to me]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/McAusten|my edits]] 17:42, 14 December 2011 (EST)
| |
| | |
| == Smash Bros. Universe ==
| |
| | |
| Is this real?: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/319665/smash-bros-universe-named-in-leaked-document/
| |
| | |
| It sure looks real and the name is fitting, as the "U" has the Wii U logo [[User:MarioMaster720]]
| |
| | |
| Anyone??? [[User:MarioMaster720]]
| |
| | |
| :It is my understanding that we are waiting for some sort of official confirmation on, well, anything in particular, before actually adding info on a new Smash Bros game to the wiki. Just like we didn't have an article on the Wii U before Nintendo announced it at E3, even though there were plenty of rumors circling around. {{User:Bop1996/sig}}
| |
| | |
| Yeah, but the whole point is that this might be a confirmation! I think that it is real, but what do you think? The question is: Do you think that it's real? [[User:MarioMaster720]]
| |
| | |
| :I would not consider it official confirmation that the game is real at this point. {{User:Bop1996/sig}}
| |
| | |
| == Super Smash Bros. 4 ==
| |
| | |
| Could someone create [[Super Smash Bros. 4|this article]] & then move it when the actual name comes out?
| |
| | |
| {{User:Electrical Bowser jr./sig}}
| |
| | |
| :We did that before several times. The results were always the same; deleted. Let us wait a bit longer.--[[User:Prince Ludwig|Prince Ludwig]] ([[User talk:Prince Ludwig|talk]]) 00:37, 21 August 2012 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| Simply No. There is no official title yet and very few things confirmed. In this Wiki there are rules that make this site particular and therefore don't allow the creation of articles with speculative or poorly-confirmed content, while others, like [[Smashwiki:Super Smash Bros 4|Smashwiki]], allow the creation of an article for it. {{User:Coincollector/sig}}
| |
| | |
| == Nintendogs ==
| |
| | |
| Nintendogs makes an appearance as an assist trophy in ssbb. There's no emblem for it though but he must be included. What shall we do ? {{User:JORDAN DEBONO/sig}} 09:03, 30 September 2012 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| We don't have any other assist trophies. Why is this one special? [[File:Marioart8.png|35px]][[User:LuigiBlubber|LuigiBlubber]][[File:Luigihattip.png|35px]]
| |
| | |
| :Well, this particular one came into my head. Having think about it, The Legendary Starfy should be mentioned as well. If we create paragraphs for series like Animal Crossing and DS just because there's one stage representing it, we should create these as well. So are you in or what ? {{User:JORDAN DEBONO/sig}} 11:35, 30 September 2012 (EDT)
| |
| ::The only series currently represented are those with characters and stages, Nintendogs has neither. Leave that to SmashWiki. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="ff8c00">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U U.png|17px]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="01a3c4">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 11:45, 30 September 2012 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| :Ok then its just that I though that if we were to do the job, we might as well do it in full that's why. {{User:JORDAN DEBONO/sig}} 12:00, 30 September 2012 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| ==Tier List==
| |
| Do you think we should add the current tier lists to the Super Mario Wiki? [[User:ilovededede|ilovededede]] 19:38, 24 January 2013 (PST)
| |
| :Being a Mario Wiki, not the [http://www.ssbwiki.com SmashWiki], I think we should keep details as close to Mario as we can, and not go into Smash-specifics which the SmashWiki covers. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="ff8c00">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U U.png|17px]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="01a3c4">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 12:11, 26 January 2013 (EST)
| |
| | |
| ==Ridley==
| |
| Ridley is a cameo in the first one http://metroid.wikia.com/wiki/File:Sbshot_ridley.jpg [[Special:Contributions/99.244.181.130|99.244.181.130]] 13:24, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| == Alternate Costumes ==
| |
| | |
| Can we get a visual chart for the alternate costumes for the Brawlers, much like how Bulbapedia does for the Pokemon characters, at least for the Mario, Yoshi, Wario, and Donkey Kong Characters? That'd be great. [[User:Jdrawer|Jdrawer]] ([[User talk:Jdrawer|talk]]) 18:13, 27 September 2013 (EDT)
| |
| :I think we should do it for all characters, not just the Mario one, as we cover nonMario stuff in greater detail than most other wikis cover Mario content. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 18:30, 27 September 2013 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| == Ridley in the 4th installment ==
| |
| | |
| On the [[Super Smash Bros. (series)#Non-playable Characters|Non-playable Characters]] subsection, Ridley is marked as confirmed for the 4th installment. Can someone back this up with some reference? {{User:Banon/sig}} 19:22, 23 August 2014 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| == Mewtwo DLC ==
| |
| | |
| With the confirmation that Mewtwo will indeed be in Smash 3DS/Wii U, it should be included in both the big character-by-game chart and the Pokemon section.
| |
| | |
| ==Amiibo Character Unlock==
| |
| Does anyone know if scanning an amiibo for a character that is locked on a new copy of Smash Bros for WiiU & 3DS would unlock that character for actual play? - [[File:Cubeguy2ver.png|30px]][[User:Cubeguy|Cubeguy]][[User talk:Cubeguy|(talk)]]
| |
| :Huh, I'm not sure anyone has tried it yet. Wario is so far the only released unlockable, but that's on 3DS. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 14:04, 21 June 2015 (EDT)
| |
| ::Yeah i was surprised when i was just sitting there playing the game and then it just hit me, why has no one tried it? - [[File:Cubeguy2ver.png|30px]][[User:Cubeguy|Cubeguy]][[User talk:Cubeguy|(talk)]]
| |
| | |
| == I'm just going to ask this here... ==
| |
| | |
| Why is there an entire database of Smash Bros. content on this wiki? I know it's not quite as comprehensive as SmashWiki but, despite clarifying on this very page that it's not a Mario game, you cover most of the details as if it is (and also have it listed as a Mario game on [[List of games]] but I digress). You even have a page for every Poké Ball Pokémon. I feel that's unnecessary for a ''Mario'' wiki. Don't get me wrong, I applaud you for all the work you've done with it. But I kind of feel it's unnecessary with [https://www.ssbwiki.com SmashWiki] being a thing. You can just link to their site. You can give each of the games and the series itself a page but I don't think pages for every item, Poké Ball Pokémon, stage, and them some is needed. On the aforementioned List of games I noticed that Minecraft has its own page but the developer links are outsourced to Wikipedia. I feel it should similarly just link to SmashWiki for all the other non-Mario related Smash stuff.
| |
| | |
| I hope this post doesn't offend anyone; I'm just putting my thoughts out there. (also first edit on this wiki xp) [[User:Aykrivwassup|Aykrivwassup]] ([[User talk:Aykrivwassup|talk]]) 20:30, 3 May 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :A proposal has (quite unfortunately) passed to remove much of it, actually, it just hasn't been fully-implemented yet. As for why we had it in the first place, because it's heavily-derivative of the ''Mario'' franchise, particularly in the name structure. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:34, 3 May 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::I understand that Mario is a major factor of it, but of course that's the case. Mario is Nintendo's cash cow; why wouldn't he be a sizable part of a Nintendo crossover fighter. That said, to be honest it could be argued that Smash derives more from Kirby than Mario. Masahiro Sakurai created both, though, so I suppose that is natural, but still. (Edit: Plus, as I said, it has [https://ssbwiki.com its own NIWA wiki].) Anyway like I said that's just my opinion. Thank you for your answer though! It is much appreciated. [[User:Aykrivwassup|Aykrivwassup]] ([[User talk:Aykrivwassup|talk]]) 22:16, 3 May 2018 (EDT)
| |
| :::And it's my opinion that Smashwiki is too jargony-diehard-oriented (how is a ten-year old supposed to know what a "nerf" is?), but that's neither here norr there. Anyway, there were no Kirby enemies in Brawl barring King Dedede's moveset, while Mario enemies were common, and more assets seem to be taken from Mario in other respects as well. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:27, 3 May 2018 (EDT)
| |
| ::::Fair enough. I mean there's always Google, and SmashWiki even has its own pages on those terms but like you said it's not that important. Thanks again for the response!{{unsigned|Aykrivwassup}}
| |
| :::::Google wouldn't probably mostly show results for the toy gun company to be honest.... [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 14:44, 4 May 2018 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| About time someone mentioned this; I'm sick of seeing all this Smash content, as if Smash is some kind of Mario spinoff. - [[User:AwdryFan1997|AwdryFan1997]]
| |
| | |
| Is there a current stance on it? I think there have been a bunch of proposals recently. --[[User:Megatron|Megatron]] ([[User talk:Megatron|talk]]) 13:26, July 15, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| == Persona ==
| |
| | |
| :''...music from [[Wikipedia:Persona 4|Persona 4]] and [[Wikipedia:Persona 3|Persona 3]]''
| |
| | |
| Is there a particular reason 4 is first? <span style="font-family:Mario Party 2/3 Textbox">[[User:RickTommy|RickTommy]] ([[User talk:RickTommy|talk]])</span> 00:32, October 1, 2019 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| :Probably not. IMO you can just reorder if it you want and I doubt there'll be much objection. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 01:01, October 1, 2019 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| == Chart Proposal: Add Roster Numbers to the Playable Characters Chart ==
| |
| {{Settled TPP}}
| |
| {{Proposal outcome|failed|1-5|Don't add}}
| |
| I am doing a chart proposal for the playable characters in this article. I know that we have a bunch of playable characters that are in the entire ''Super Smash Bros.'' series including ''Super Smash Bros. Ultimate'' that are getting close to less than 100 as of right now. Since ''Ultimate'' managed to give roster numbers for every playable fighters in ''Super Smash Bros. Ultimate'', I think by adding the roster number into the chart would help the readers since we definitely know which characters by which number they appear since the checkmarks and Xs were used for the all the games and are only listed in alphabetical order instead of organized by the roster order.
| |
| | |
| This is my proposal for adding the roster numbers into the chart:
| |
| | |
| {| class="article-table sortable" border="1" cellspacing=0 cellpadding=3 style="text-align:center"
| |
| |-
| |
| !width=39%| Character name
| |
| !width=7%| ''Super Smash Bros.''
| |
| !width=7%| ''Super Smash Bros. Melee''
| |
| !width=7%| ''Super Smash Bros. Brawl''
| |
| !width=7%| ''Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo 3DS'' / ''Wii U''
| |
| !width=7%| ''Super Smash Bros. Ultimate''
| |
| !width=40%| Series
| |
| !width=7%| ''Roster Number''
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Banjo]] & [[Kazooie]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] (DLC) || ''Banjo-Kazooie'' series || 73
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Bayonetta]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] (DLC) || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Bayonetta'' series || 63
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Bowser]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Mario'' series || 14
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Bowser Jr.]] and [[Koopalings]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||[[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Mario'' series || 58
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Byleth]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] (DLC) || ''Fire Emblem'' series || 75
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Captain Falcon]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||[[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''F-Zero'' series || 11
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Charizard]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||[[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Pokémon'' series || 35
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Chrom]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Fire Emblem'' series || 25e
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Cloud Strife|Cloud]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] (DLC) || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Final Fantasy'' series || 61
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Corrin]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] (DLC) || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Fire Emblem'' series || 62
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Princess Daisy|Daisy]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Mario'' series || 13e
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Dark Pit]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||[[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Kid Icarus'' series || 28e
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Dark Samus]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Metroid'' series || 04e
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Diddy Kong]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Donkey Kong'' series || 36
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Dr. Mario (character)|Dr. Mario]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Mario'' series || 18
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Donkey Kong]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Donkey Kong'' series || 02
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Duck Hunt (character)|Duck Hunt]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Duck Hunt'' series || 59
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Falco Lombardi|Falco]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Star Fox'' series || 20
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Fox McCloud|Fox]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||[[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Star Fox'' series || 07
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Ganondorf]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||[[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''The Legend of Zelda'' series || 23
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Greninja]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Pokémon'' series || 50
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Hero]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] (DLC) || ''Dragon Quest'' series || 72
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Ice Climbers]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Ice Climber'' || 15
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Ike]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Fire Emblem'' series || 32
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Incineroar]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||''Pokémon'' series || 69
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Inkling]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||''Splatoon'' series || 64
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Isabelle]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||''Animal Crossing'' series || 68
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Ivysaur]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||''Pokémon'' series || 34
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Jigglypuff]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Pokémon'' series || 12
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Joker]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] (DLC) || ''Persona'' series || 71
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Ken Masters|Ken]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||''Street Fighter'' series || 60e
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[King Dedede]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||[[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Kirby'' series || 39
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[King K. Rool]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Donkey Kong'' series || 67
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Kirby]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||[[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Kirby'' series || 06
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Link]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||[[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''The Legend of Zelda'' series || 03
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Little Mac]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Punch-Out!!'' series || 49
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Lucario]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Pokémon'' series || 41
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Lucas]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]](DLC) || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''EarthBound'' series || 37
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Lucina]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Fire Emblem'' series || 21e
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Luigi]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Mario'' series || 09
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Mario]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||[[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Mario'' series || 01
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Marth]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Fire Emblem'' series || 21
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Mega Man]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Mega Man series || 46
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Meta Knight]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Kirby'' series || 27
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Mewtwo]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]](DLC) || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Pokémon'' series || 24
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Mii|Mii Fighters]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Super Smash Bros.'' series || 51-53
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Min Min]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] (DLC) || ''ARMS'' || 76
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Mr. Game & Watch]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Game & Watch'' series || 26
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Ness]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''EarthBound'' series || 10
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Captain Olimar|Olimar]] and [[Alph]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]]{{footnote|main|1}} || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||[[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Pikmin'' series || 40
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Pac-Man]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Pac-Man'' series || 55
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Palutena]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Kid Icarus'' series || 54
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Princess Peach|Peach]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Mario'' series || 13
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Pichu]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] ||[[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Pokémon'' series || 19
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Pikachu]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||[[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Pokémon'' series || 08
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Piranha Plant]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] (DLC) ||''Mario'' series || 70
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Pit (character)|Pit]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||[[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Kid Icarus'' series || 28
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Pokémon Trainer]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] ||[[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Pokémon'' series || 33-35
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Richter Belmont|Richter]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Castlevania'' series || 66e
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Ridley]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Metroid'' series || 65
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[R.O.B.]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Robot'' series || 42
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Robin]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Fire Emblem'' series || 56
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Rosalina]] & [[Luma (species)|Luma]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Mario'' series || 48
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Roy (Fire Emblem)|Roy]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] (DLC) || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Fire Emblem'' series || 25
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Ryu]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] (DLC) || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Street Fighter'' series || 60
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Samus Aran|Samus]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Metroid'' series || 04
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Sheik]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''The Legend of Zelda'' series || 16
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Shulk]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Xenoblade Chronicles'' series || 57
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Simon Belmont|Simon]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Castlevania'' series || 66
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Solid Snake|Snake]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Metal Gear'' series || 31
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Sonic the Hedgehog|Sonic]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Sonic the Hedgehog'' series || 38
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Squirtle]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Pokémon'' series || 33
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Steve (Minecraft)|Steve, Alex, Zombie, and Enderman]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] (DLC) || ''Minecraft'' series || 77
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Terry Bogard|Terry]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] (DLC) || ''Fatal Fury'' series || 74
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Toon Link]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''The Legend of Zelda'' series || 43
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Villager]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Animal Crossing'' series || 45
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Wario]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Wario'' series || 30
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Wii Fit Trainer]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Wii Fit'' series || 47
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Wolf O'Donnell|Wolf]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Star Fox'' series || 44
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Yoshi]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Yoshi'' series || 05
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Young Link]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] ||''The Legend of Zelda'' series || 22
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Princess Zelda|Zelda]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''The Legend of Zelda'' series || 17
| |
| |-
| |
| |[[Zero Suit Samus]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:X_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || [[File:Check_mark.svg|17px]] || ''Metroid'' series || 29
| |
| |}
| |
| | |
| [[User:King Marth 64|King Marth 64]] ([[User talk:King Marth 64|talk]]) 16:16, October 3, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| '''Proposer''': {{User|King Marth 64}}<br>
| |
| '''Deadline''': October 17, 2020, 23:59 GMT
| |
| | |
| ===Support===
| |
| #{{User|King Marth 64}} Per proposal
| |
| | |
| ===Oppose===
| |
| #{{User|Scrooge200}} This seems to be entirely ''Ultimate''-based information. I'd rather have it just go on ''Ultimate'''s page.
| |
| #{{User|Archivist Toadette}} That can go on SmashWiki.
| |
| #{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per Scrooge, this only applies to one game so far.
| |
| #{{User|FanOfYoshi}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|1337star}} This idea isn't future-proofed. What would we do if/when the next ''Smash'' game introduces new characters but doesn't use ''Ultimate'''s roster numbers?
| |
| | |
| ===Comments===
| |
| I quickly checked Smash Wiki, and they decided not to use the numbers except for in the introductions of their Smash Ultimate character articles. Thus, I don't think this proposal can be opposed on the basis of it belonging on Smash Wiki. (This [[smashwiki:Talk:Fighter#Add_fighter_numbers|talk section]] states this directly, linking to this [[smashwiki:Talk:Fighter/Archive_3#Fighter_Numbers|talk section]], which shows the debate but not a decision. I'm assuming that a decision was reached on another page somewhere.) [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 20:27, October 3, 2020 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| ==Current stance on Smash content on MarioWiki?==
| |
| What's the current stance on whether to add/remove/edit/change all the Smash information on this wiki? I've seen quite a few proposals/discussions but nothing conclusive. I think we're well past the period where Smash was considered a Mario spinoff by some people, and none of the other Nintendo or NIWA wikis do the same. --[[User:Megatron|Megatron]] ([[User talk:Megatron|talk]]) 13:29, July 15, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :The most recent proposal on it ended in favor of keeping our current coverage the same. Also, we don't do things just because other wikis do or don't do them a certain way. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 13:35, July 15, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :: Understood, I think that what the wiki already does, namely referring to Smash as "Mario-related media" rather than "Mario series" and clearly stating that it's not a Mario spinoff, may do the job. For reference, Serebii (the most popular Pokémon fansite) also has a page on every Smash fighter and it's weird af, so I guess it is a case of different sites doing their own thing. Do you have a link to the proposal, though? I'm interested in reading what people had to say. --[[User:Megatron|Megatron]] ([[User talk:Megatron|talk]]) 13:54, July 15, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :::[[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/56#Remove_non-Mario_characters_from_the_trophies,_Assist_Trophy,_stickers,_and_Spirit_pages|Sure, here it is.]] It's a bit of a long read, Smash coverage is a pretty heated topic around here. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 14:00, July 15, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| ::::Thanks, I think I had a look at it but I think it excluded any decisions on the fighter pages themselves. Though imo I think the wiki is doing a good job already of establishing that Smash is ''not'' a Mario spinoff (especially compared to how it used to be), but like I said on the board maybe more can be done too? I'm thinking maybe an "external crossovers" category that covers any crossovers that aren't part of the Mario franchise or its true spinoffs (not just Smash but also Fortune Street, Captain N, etc.) --[[User:Megatron|Megatron]] ([[User talk:Megatron|talk]]) 14:05, July 15, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| :::::Yeah, going all-or-nothing in a proposal like this doesn't end well so usually they're limited to trimming only certain parts of Smash coverage. I assume that if this proposal had passed then other aspects of the series would've been re-assessed at a later time. You could start a proposal about your external crossovers idea if you want. Also, you might be interested in reading [[MarioWiki:Coverage]] which explains how we handle stuff like this. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 14:17, July 15, 2021 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| == Idea for compromise between viewpoints on coverage ==
| |
| | |
| "Everything gets a page" and "only directly ''Mario''-based things should be mentioned at all" are two radical extremes, both of which cause more harm than good. Due to this, I have come up with a way that should satisfy all (non-radical) opinions on the matter: namely, everything gets equal mention on the games' pages (as we do with actual ''Mario'' games) while only ''Mario'' stuff gets individualized pages. For example, Jigglypuff has no reason to have a page on this wiki, but it would be foolish to not list Jigglypuff in the game pages' "characters" sections. We've already gotten rid of the stuff we outright have no reason to get (like that silly article on Snake's cardboard box, separate articles for random Smash Run enemies, etc), so currently, we more just need to ''rearrange'' what remains in a coherent manner, since the current method veers toward awkward. I've pitched this before in the comments of another proposal, and it got a lot of approval, so when the time is right, I'm going to make a full proposal on it:<br>
| |
| I have thought long and hard about the "proper" way for us to cover ''Super Smash Bros.'' in a way that both respects the desire to focus primarily on ''Super Mario'' elements while also respecting the desire to not leave anything uncovered. As such, the main way to do this is to '''give pages only to ''Super Mario'' elements, whilst covering everything else on the pages for the individual ''Super Smash Bros.'' games; unless otherwise stated, they will instead link to other wikis, be if the base series' wiki or SmashWiki'''. For instance, Link will remain an internal link (no pun intended) because he's crossed over otherwise, Ganondorf will link to Zeldawiki because he hasn't. Link's moves (originating from the ''Legend of Zelda'' series) will link to Zeldawiki, while Ganondorf's moves (original moves due to being based on Captain Falcon's moves) will link to Smashwiki.<br>
| |
| Other specific aspects of thism which for the most part make the game pages' internal coverage be more consistent with how we handle other games':
| |
| #Merge the "List of items in Smash" page to the games entirely, turning that into a redirect to a section on the series page. That page's existence has always bothered me, and I'm in the "keep as much as reasonable" camp.
| |
| #Merge the "enemies" pages to their respective game - they're already structured like any other game's enemy tables anyway. These pages ''also'' always bothered me.
| |
| #Merge the "Subspace Army" and "Subspace Stages" lists to each other to recreate a watered-down version of the Subspace Emissary page (to split from the Brawl page due to length and being exclusive to that campaign); it would also include a table for characters describing their role in said campaign, as well as objects/items found exclusively in it (Trophy Stands, the funny boxes, the metallic barrel cannons, etc) - once again, all except ''Mario''-derived things will link elsewhere (mostly to Smashwiki in this case).
| |
| #Section each game akin to how I had the SSB64 page as of [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Super_Smash_Bros.&oldid=4340069 this] edit, ''including'' sections for Pokemon, Assist Trophies, Bosses, etc., and links to other wikis for subjects that we don't need pages on. Other sections can be added as needed.
| |
| #Leave the lists for fighters, stages, and (series-wide) bosses alone (for now at least), as they make more sense to have a series-wide representation on here (similar to the fighters) in some capacity than the items or enemies. Also, you never know when one of them is going to cross over otherwise, like Villager, Isabelle, and Inkling suddenly joining ''Mario Kart'', so it's good to keep that around in case a split is deemed necessary from something like that happening down the line.
| |
| #Have image galleries cover ''everything'' that can reasonably be included in an image gallery for the game, regardless of origin. This includes artwork, sprites, models, screenshots, etc, for any subject - yes, including Pokemon, so that will unfortunately have to undo [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/68#Remove lists of Poké Ball and stage-exclusive Pokémon on ''Smash Bros.'' game pages and allow each Poké Ball Pokémon only one representative artwork/screenshot|that one proposal I originally brought this plan up in the comments of]] in order to work fully. Just like on the game pages, the labels will link to other sites as needed.
| |
| #Leave Stickers and Spirits alone, their pages are too large to merge and are fine as they are for the reasons that opposition to deleting them historically has brought up.
| |
| #Keep trophy and assist trophy pages covering only ''Mario'' things, leave the remainder in the game gallery.
| |
| | |
| People may wonder, "What about Nintendo Land and NES Remix? Why don't they get this level of coverage?" It's simple, really: In ''Smash'', you can have Mario throw a Deku Nut at Ridley in Lumiose City and nobody bats an eye at how absurd that situation is. In those other games, the different representations are very much split apart; all ''Mario''-related stuff is within a few minigames that do not overlap whatsoever with any of the other ones. In ''Nintendo Land'', you cannot have Mario fighting Ridley in the Lost Woods, despite (representations of) all of those things appearing in the game. In ''Smash'', anyone can interact with anything, regardless of origin, so ''Mario'' characters can interact with anything, and anyone can interact with ''Mario'' things. That's why ''Smash'', the melting pot it is, gets more focus than ''Nintendo Land'', where everything's more of a side dish.<br>
| |
| Anyways, questions? Concerns? Comments? Generalized statements of support or opposition? Does anyone have an alternate (non-radical) idea? [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 13:22, August 31, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :I like this idea. I can agree to not giving ''everything'' in ''Smash'' an article, but, as I stated on the recent proposal surrounding the music articles, I'm not a fan of outright not covering this stuff. At least mentioning and covering these things in their respective ''Smash'' articles feels like a nice in between. Sure, we don't need a full article dedicated to a Killing Edge from ''Fire Emblem'', but to just not make any mention of it simply because it's not ''Mario'' related? Point being, I can agree to this approach. {{User:Tails777/sig}}
| |
| :Strong support. In general, covering the ''Smash Bros.'' series on this wiki similar to guest appearance seems to be the best option. If ''Super Smash Bros.'' for N64 was the only game in the series, covering it in full would be the best option, but ''Smash'' strays further away from being just a Nintendo crossover. Now it's a crossover between... pretty much everything in gaming. I would argue if ''Smash Ultimate'' was the only game in the series, this wiki would call it a guest appearance and there wouldn't ever be a need for this discussion. [[User:Axii|Axii]] ([[User talk:Axii|talk]]) 16:14, August 31, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::Just as before, and I will note this again, one of the pieces is trying to undo a proposal of mine that passed. What am I missing about the Poke Ball Pokemon's connections to ''Super Mario''? I simply just don't see it. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 18:03, August 31, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::In the ''Super Smash Bros.'' games, Mario can: pick up a Poké Ball; throw a Poké Ball; receive damage from a Poké Ball; engage directly with the creatures contained (either in being the summoner or in being the recipient of their attacks); Ditto can physically transform into Mario; etc. The fact that those things can also occur for Sephiroth or Snake do not mitigate that fact.
| |
| :::I completely understand if you personally feel that is not substantive enough for coverage. I get it. But I think suggesting they have "nothing" to do with ''Super Mario'' is wholly accurate. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 18:13, August 31, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::That means they have something to do with ''Castlevania'', ''Banjo-Kazooie'', ''Final Fantasy'', ''Kingdom Hearts'', ''Street Fighter'', so forth and so forth. There wouldn't be any of this arguing if SmashWiki handled their coverage in a way this wiki likes, since everyone would agree clearly on "it's not ''Super Mario''; it's ''Smash Bros.''" [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 18:17, August 31, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::Is it not ''Super Mario'' simply because it is ''Super Smash Bros.''? Is any crossover game not the sum of its parts? I think it comes down to what people want covered on Super Mario Wiki, and less about any self-imposition. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 18:22, August 31, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::Wikis are not divided solely by what they cover, but the community of editors interested in that topic. The fact that Smashwiki has such a vastly different community and writing standards is indeed related (that "buff" and "nerf" were used unironically in prose and headers and there were whole articles over real-world players last I checked is indicative of that) - and if as you said the ''exact same members'' were the editors there, then it wouldn't be a different community in the first place, making that somewhat moot. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 18:23, August 31, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::{{@|Nintendo101}} Yeah, so imagine if a Castlevania wiki had screenshots of all these Pokemon. Would that feel right or awkward? The interactive nature is the same as to ''Super Mario'' characters. I'm not trying to offend in any way when I say this, but if this wiki becomes a dumping grounds for unrelated content simply because we don't like how another wiki does it, that will affect the integrity of this wiki badly. I remember a proposal here for full ''Minecraft'' coverage. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 18:25, August 31, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::I know that wasn't directed at me, but consider that of the represented franchises, only Mario and allies, Zelda, Metroid, Kirby, Pokemon, Earthbound, and F-Zero have had representation in every ''Smash Bros.'' game - hence reason to have "all these" images, and of those, many were very token in the representation they got at the start. ''Mario'' is a notable outlier there in that it got a bunch from the very beginning. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 18:30, August 31, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::Okay, but I'm starting to make the point that if SmashWiki allowed the galleries and the wikitables you wouldn't fight so hard for the content to be kept on this wiki, so that's why there's all these excuses for keeping lists of Pokemon on a Super Mario wiki. They're not as notable as the items, i.e. the Poke Ball, which they're components of. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 18:34, August 31, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::I'd disagree they are "components" of the item. They're more a separate type of summoned NPC fighter that is intrinsically related to the item, that until the addition of the assist trophies, was an extremely unique aspect of the gameplay that bears explanation simply due to how different from the rest of it that system is. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 18:38, August 31, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::::::::I'm trying to not regurgitate the same points that I made before, but they are NPC fighters 100% representing ''Pokemon'', whilst Assist Trophies have "melting pot" franchise representation. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 18:44, August 31, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::::::Thing is, the article ''[[Super Smash Bros.]]'' does not describe the ''Super Mario'' series. It describes a crossover game. Therefore, we should describe what ''crosses over'' within the context of the game, not limit our scope to a myopic range around the ''Mario'' stuff. ''[[Itadaki Street DS]]'' is also not a ''Mario'' game in title or spirit, and we still list all the Square-Enix stuff found in it. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:00, August 31, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::::::That is a fair question, and not at all offensive. I don't know how I would feel as a reader, but if the community at this hypothetical Castlevania Wiki wanted to cover it, then I think that would be fine. There is ''Castlevania'' material in ''Super Smash Bros. Ultimate''. I would probably find it odder if they had full coverage for a game like ''Super Bomberman R'' because there is a Simon Belmont Bomber - a character that is in fact ''not'' Simon Belmont, but a Bomberman character based on him. I don't believe I was involved in the ''Minecraft'' proposal you mentioned or I at least don't remember, but I understand it considering, for as far as I know, the Super Mario Mash-Up content are considered skins of ''Mario'' subjects and not the "real" articles.
| |
| :::::::But that is my personal perspective. Other folks are welcomed to feel differently and share their thoughts. What I think would be healthier for a discussion at large is to move away from imposing definitions on ourselves, appreciate that we are in fact human beings making curatorial choices on coverage, and have a more honest conversation about that. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 18:36, August 31, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :My personal viewpoint, philosophically but maybe not ''practically'', is that... I don't think there's any sense in having an incomplete list, and I don't think "list of all Mario-related X" counts as a complete list. I think this proposal might be as close as we can get to lining up with that — minor stuff like trophies and spirits will still be out of line but I can't really think of a sensible way to fix that. I'm all in favor of it. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 21:03, August 31, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| '''Addendum to the list''': I figured the "minigame" pages needed dealt with as well.
| |
| *Include the "minigame" stages (Break the Targets, Board the Platforms, Race to the Finish, Snag Trophies, Home Run Contest, Trophy Tussle, the Melee Adventure Mode stages) in the "list of stages debuting in [game]" articles. For ones like Targets, it would just explain how it worked and then have a gallery for the different layouts rather than describing each in detail. Said minigame pages should be merged to a section in the SSB series article covering the series' minigames. The Subspace Emissary stages will get a section with a {{tem|main}} to the stage section of the Subspace Emissary article (detailed in an above point).<br>
| |
| -[[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:25, September 2, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :That merge sounds sensible, as long as they're in a separate heading.from the multiplayer stages. Also, how will we be handling the different Break the Targets layouts in this case? Listing them separately seems pointless, but the images have to go somewhere. I suppose we just have a gallery of each Break the Targets stage under the subheader? [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 22:38, September 2, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::That's basically what I said. Not sure if a subheader is needed, but a gallery with labels for each layout (ie, characters for the first two games, difficulty for Brawl). But yes, they would be separated from the "multiplayer" stages, though for SSB, the three single-player-only battlefields should also probably be listed with the targets, platforms, and race stages. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:41, September 2, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| :::Oh, I just meant "under the Break the Targets header" — you wouldn't need a subheader underneath it for the gallery. ....in any case, do you think Adventure Mode stages are different enough in nature to be separate from the multiplayer ''and'' minigame stages? Subspace definitely is, so I have to wonder. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 23:00, September 2, 2024 (EDT)
| |
| ::::Not quite sure, as I wouldn't consider them different from "Race to the Finish" which is treated roughly equal to Targets/Platforms/Trophies. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:22, September 2, 2024 (EDT)
| |