Editing Talk:Puff (species)

Is this page needed, when we also have [[Ruff Puff]] already? All family members are listed there as well and they are labelled as Ruff Puff sub-species. - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 13:20, 26 September 2009 (EDT)

:Nope, just a wasted space. And also reac the trivia, WTF?--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}}

== Delete Puff (species) ==
{{TPP}}
There's no need for this page considering [[Ruff Puff]]s are obviously the "primary" species, making this, essentially, a hypothetical parent species.

'''Proposer:''' {{User|Binarystep}}<br>
'''Deadline:''' May 29, 2015, 23:59 GMT

===Support===
#{{User|Binarystep}} Per proposal.
#{{User|Magikrazy}} What's even the point in keeping it?
#{{User|ShyGuy8}} Per Proposal.
#{{User|Burningdragon25}} That is a must go for this article! Per all!
#{{User|Lumastar}} This is a thing?

===Oppose===

===Comments===
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==(First topic)==
 Is this page needed, when we also have [[Ruff Puff]] already? All family members are listed there as well and they are labelled as Ruff Puff sub-species. - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 13:20, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
@@ Line 5: / Line 4: @@
 == Delete Puff (species) ==
-{{Settled TPP}}
+{{TPP}}
-{{Proposal outcome|passed|9-0|Delete}}
 There's no need for this page considering [[Ruff Puff]]s are obviously the "primary" species, making this, essentially, a hypothetical parent species.
@@ Line 19: / Line 16: @@
 #{{User|Burningdragon25}} That is a must go for this article! Per all!
 #{{User|Lumastar}} This is a thing?
-#{{User|Mario}} Yes, this is a hypothetical parent species. No need to create a redundant article when the species is not ''that'' expansive and we have the root species.
-#{{User|Walkazo}} - Per all. These umbrella species pages in general bug me, seeing as they're actually talking about ''multiple'' species, but that's a whole other kettle of fish...
-#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per Mario and Walkazo
-#{{User|LudwigVon}} Per all.
 ===Oppose===
 ===Comments===