Editing Talk:Penguin
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Yeah, you tell him... Wait, there's a forum!?--[[User:Dreyfus2006|Dreyfus2006]] 00:37, 12 June 2007 (EDT) | :Yeah, you tell him... Wait, there's a forum!?--[[User:Dreyfus2006|Dreyfus2006]] 00:37, 12 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
::Yeah, [ | ::Yeah, [http://forum.mariowiki.com/ here]. {{User:Great Gonzo/sig}} | ||
== Penguin vs Bumpty Discussion == | == Penguin vs Bumpty Discussion == | ||
Alright, the debate is now [ | Alright, the debate is now [http://forum.mariowiki.com/viewtopic.php?t=649 here]. Thanks for pointing the forum out, by the by.--[[User:Dreyfus2006|Dreyfus2006]] 00:57, 12 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
Line 29: | Line 23: | ||
==Sub-/Related Species== | ==Sub-/Related Species== | ||
{{talk}} | |||
What exactly is the logic behind which penguin enemies are listed as "sub-species" and which ones are "related species"? Why is Cooligan, for instance, a sub-species of penguin while Pendril is merely related? Is a Pendril somehow less of a penguin than a Cooligan? I'm confused :|--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 17:07, 26 April 2010 (EDT) | What exactly is the logic behind which penguin enemies are listed as "sub-species" and which ones are "related species"? Why is Cooligan, for instance, a sub-species of penguin while Pendril is merely related? Is a Pendril somehow less of a penguin than a Cooligan? I'm confused :|--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 17:07, 26 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
:FourPaperHeroes has been adding speculative related species to speculative articles, like Penguin and [[Dragon]]. {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | :FourPaperHeroes has been adding speculative related species to speculative articles, like Penguin and [[Dragon]]. {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | ||
::None of them is confirmed to be a sub-species. Should any penguin-like species really be included under "related species"? But anyway, isn't "related species" based on personal opinion? I could say that anything that resembles an octopus or squid is related to Blooper just because of their appearance. Do I have proof? No. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 20:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC) | ::None of them is confirmed to be a sub-species. Should any penguin-like species really be included under "related species"? But anyway, isn't "related species" based on personal opinion? I could say that anything that resembles an octopus or squid is related to Blooper just because of their appearance. Do I have proof? No. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 20:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC) | ||