Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 380: |
Line 380: |
|
| |
|
| == Proposal: Shrooms is Shrooms == | | == Proposal: Shrooms is Shrooms == |
| {{Settled TPP}} | | |
| {{Proposal outcome|failed|9-18}}
| | {{TPP}} |
| I might be rocking the boat a little too hard here, but here goes. | | I might be rocking the boat a little too hard here, but here goes. |
|
| |
|
Line 430: |
Line 430: |
| #{{User|KamekSans}} It's simple; While they may look identical, Super Mushrooms are the ones that grant Super form, while this page describes the mushrooms that ''don't'' do that. | | #{{User|KamekSans}} It's simple; While they may look identical, Super Mushrooms are the ones that grant Super form, while this page describes the mushrooms that ''don't'' do that. |
| #{{User|LinkTheLefty}} I feel like this is too broad and should be determined case by case. | | #{{User|LinkTheLefty}} I feel like this is too broad and should be determined case by case. |
| #{{User|Pizza Master}} These are different mushrooms with different effects. These articles were split for a reason and should remain split. Also, a merge of these mushrooms feels like a violation of the "everything but the kitchen sink" principle tbh.
| |
| #{{User|Axii}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Rykitu}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} Per all, especially EvieMaybe and Cadrega86. Splitting the Mushroom and Super Mushroom articles like Cadrega86 lays out and leaving the Dash Mushroom article alone would make much more sense.
| |
| #{{User|FanOfYoshi}} Per all.
| |
|
| |
|
| ====Comments==== | | ====Comments==== |
Line 491: |
Line 486: |
| It is decidedly not simple. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 03:41, November 8, 2024 (EST) | | It is decidedly not simple. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 03:41, November 8, 2024 (EST) |
| :Honestly, I've been wanting to split Power-up Mushroom too, I just kept forgetting about it. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 12:16, November 8, 2024 (EST) | | :Honestly, I've been wanting to split Power-up Mushroom too, I just kept forgetting about it. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 12:16, November 8, 2024 (EST) |
| :A bit late here but I hard agree with this. Frankly, it feels like there are a lot of no votes here who assume that the functionality is far more cleanly deliniated by name than it actually is. It would be nice if there were only three things these mushrooms did and the distinction were clearly named, but that's frankly just not what's happening here. Dash Mushroom, maybe, if you ignore all the games where they weren't called that yet or anymore. Super vs. Regular Mushroom? It's a total mess. {{User:Exiled.Serenity/sig|Sarah}} 17:13, November 18, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
|
| {{@|Nintendo101}} It should probably be noted that Dr. Mario is not a section of Mario mostly on sheer number of significant appearances, a series named after him, being a distinct character in Super Smash Bros. and to avoid the dreaded "talking to oneself" effect regarding the [[Super Mario (Kodansha manga)]] where he is a separate character. After Dr. Mario World had every character get a Ph.d it was decided in [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/53#Merge all doctor versions of characters into their respective article (excluding Dr. Mario)|this proposal]] that no other doctor gets to have an article, irrespective of having a new design or being recurring outside of Dr. Mario World. (Even Nurse Toadstool and Dr. Luigi, the latter of which has a game named after them.) If having a new name, lab coat and head mirror isn't good enough even as a indicator of a specific genre/brand, then things are looking rough for the items with identical appearances which "seemingly" divide by series. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 06:17, November 8, 2024 (EST) | | {{@|Nintendo101}} It should probably be noted that Dr. Mario is not a section of Mario mostly on sheer number of significant appearances, a series named after him, being a distinct character in Super Smash Bros. and to avoid the dreaded "talking to oneself" effect regarding the [[Super Mario (Kodansha manga)]] where he is a separate character. After Dr. Mario World had every character get a Ph.d it was decided in [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/53#Merge all doctor versions of characters into their respective article (excluding Dr. Mario)|this proposal]] that no other doctor gets to have an article, irrespective of having a new design or being recurring outside of Dr. Mario World. (Even Nurse Toadstool and Dr. Luigi, the latter of which has a game named after them.) If having a new name, lab coat and head mirror isn't good enough even as a indicator of a specific genre/brand, then things are looking rough for the items with identical appearances which "seemingly" divide by series. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 06:17, November 8, 2024 (EST) |
| :I see that more like how we don't have a separate page for [[Fire Luigi]]. It's not ''technically'' a "power-up," but it's a shared style of alter-ego. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 12:17, November 8, 2024 (EST) | | :I see that more like how we don't have a separate page for [[Fire Luigi]]. It's not ''technically'' a "power-up," but it's a shared style of alter-ego. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 12:17, November 8, 2024 (EST) |
|
| |
| I also wish to point out why Schrodinger's (Super) (Dash) Mushoom is a real problem for image categorization. Like the proposal already points it out, but an example might help. Take [[:File:PN Holiday 2022 Super Mushroom.png]], supposedly a "Super Mushroom". The ornament creator where it is from only has a Super Star in it, so it can't be eliminated from any of the three Mushrooms brackets on associated items alone. The app includes paired with generic Mario artwork, so that's no help either. If Nintendo had both Super Mario and Mario Kart artwork in that app we'd be stuck with a Mushroom that can't be placed, foiled by our own flawed categorization. The only reason I can think for that art to be firmly placed in the "Super Mushroom" gallery is that non-descript red capped mushroom items with no series association are "Super Mushrooms", but that would be reading between the lines we drew ourselves. Never ever being able to be certain about what artwork presents what thing is a problem. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 06:12, November 10, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :You could say the same about splits such as [[Yoshi]] and [[Yoshi (species)]], or [[Kamek]] and [[Magikoopa]], or even [[Piranha Plant]] and [[Piranha Plant (Pit of 100 Trials)]]. Same appearance doesn't always mean same thing. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 08:49, November 10, 2024 (EST)
| |
| ::Okay, wow Piranha Plant is new to me. That's an enigma that thankfully doesn't have an independent gallery. The other two aren't issues like dividing Mushrooms are, because Yoshi is a Yoshi, and Kamek is a Magikoopa. The fallback case works for anything that cannot be conclusively stated as one or the other. (And for them, it isn't based on a quality that can be determined solely by gameplay which doesn't always exist.) Dash Mushrooms are Mushrooms, not Super Mushrooms. "The Dash Mushroom... is a type of mushroom physically identical to a Super Mushroom". And yet the indeterminites are hanging out on [[Gallery:Super Mushroom]], which sorta pokes a hole in this being a simple split where everything is in an obvious location. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 13:09, November 10, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :::here's an interesting question: can we merge galleries without merging the base pages? make a Gallery:Mushroom (or Super Mushroom) that shows normal, Super and Dash Mushrooms in one spot, maybe clarifying which is which in the image description? [[User:EvieMaybe|EvieMaybe]] ([[User talk:EvieMaybe|talk]]) 08:34, November 15, 2024 (EST)
| |
| Why on earth is the Golden Mushroom from ''Mario Party 2'' and ''Mario Party 3'' covered on the [[Super Mushroom]] article instead of [[Golden Mushroom (crownless)]]? Not only is it literally a golden Mushroom, its localized name isn't "Super Mushroom", it's "Golden Mushroom". Even if the Japanese versions of those games call it the Super Mushroom, the most common English name is prioritized per [[MarioWiki:Naming]], so they should still be covered on the Golden (non-Dash) Mushroom article. {{User:ThePowerPlayer/sig}} 12:07, November 16, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :Well, because ''not only'' has that Mushroom's Japanese name been "Super Kinoko", but the same item has also been referred to as "Super Mushroom" in later Mario Party titles, as evidenced by the [[Super 'Shroom Orb]] (or Super Mushroom Capsule). This was explained in [[Talk:Golden Mushroom#Split this page's distinct items|a prior proposal]], and is similar to why Cursed Mushroom is to be split from [[Poison Mushroom]], as decided by [[Talk:Poison Mushroom#Split Cursed Mushroom from this article|a more recent proposal]]. Not to mention that [[Talk:Orb#Merge Orbs that share names with pre-existing Mario Party series items with those items|another proposal]] has decided that certain Orbs are to be merged with their respective original items, meaning that the Super 'Shroom Orb would have to be merged to Super Mushroom anyway. {{User:Arend/sig}} 12:59, November 16, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :Also, MarioWiki:Naming is only about what to call things, not how to organise them. [[Talk:Pale Piranha#Re-re-re-merge into Piranha Plant yet again: the Squeakwel|There's]] [[Talk:Cleft#Merge Super Paper Mario Moon Cleft content here|precedent]] for basing organisation more closely on original Japanese naming despite referring to the subjects with their English names. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 22:02, November 17, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| This might be the one subject matter that rivals Banana and Cheep Cheep variants in terms of contentiousness. No wonder Mario gets so disgusted at a platter of these things in the movie. {{User:Mario/sig}} 15:52, November 16, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| While it's clear at this point that this proposal isn't going to pass at the current moment, I would like to bring up a particular point that has made me feel more strongly in support of this proposal since it came to my mind: the wiki currently considers the Dash Mushroom from ''Super Mario Party'' et al to be distinct from the Mushroom in ''Mario Party Superstars'' et al. These Mushrooms may have different names, but their appearance is identical and their effects are almost identical: adding a fixed value to the player's dice roll (even exactly equal to half of the maximum roll in both cases, which varies between games). Now, I understand why this may be and why people oppose the merge, but consider this: how is this different from the Mushroom that appears in early games of the ''Mario Kart'' series, before the name Dash Mushroom was used in either English or Japanese? ''[[Super Mario Kart]]'' is one example of this. If we are to strictly split these pages based on their differing names and regardless of their shared appearance or effects, should ''Super Mario Kart''{{'}}s Mushroom be split from the current Dash Mushroom article (and put on the Mushroom article)? I do not actually think this would be a good idea to be clear, I'm more trying to point out the issues with having these articles be split as they are. I hope this is food for thought on the subject, at least. {{User:Pseudo/sig}} 16:19, November 18, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :This argument was already had [[Talk:Dash Mushroom#Mario Party Superstars|here]]. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 20:06, November 18, 2024 (EST)
| |
| ::Fair enough I guess, though I didn't personally see or participate in this (and wasn't very active on the wiki at that time), and do still think it's a relevant point to make. {{User:Pseudo/sig}} 20:10, November 18, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| A bit of a "postmortem" in the final hour of this proposal: I know it's two-to-one against this passing, but given how many opposing votes there are, I'm a bit pleased with even that, especially with some of the passionate support for it. I feel like it'd be bad form for me to try this proposal again with no executional changes (immediately, at least), but if someone else figures out how to do this in a way that satisfies everyone, or just feels strongly enough to run it back, I'll back them every step of the way — I still stand by everything I said in the proposal, after all. (Maybe make it a proposal-page proposal this time, like Salmancer said.) As for myself, in a month or two, I might make a proposal to just split the strong variants out of the Super Mushroom article. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 18:24, November 18, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Split Refreshroom (Giant) ==
| |
| {{settled TPP}}
| |
| {{proposal outcome|vetoed|Too early to overturn [[Talk:Refreshroom#Split the Giant Bowser battle Refreshroom|this proposal]]}}
| |
| This is not just an ordinary mushroom. Like the [[Dash Mushroom]] that shares the same appearance as the normal [[Mushroom]], the '''Refreshroom''' from [[Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story]] shares a similar appearance but functions differently from its normal counterpart and is given a separate name (Admittedly, just in the original release). Unlike the [[Mario & Luigi (series)|M & L]] Mushroom that just heals 30 hp for either bro (and [[Bowser]] if he gets one from an enemy) this heals 50% of [[Giant Bowser]]'s health. In [[Mario & Luigi: Dream Team]], this item functions differently than in Inside Story as a mushroom that heals [[Giant Luigi]] just a bit more than a single small mushroom from the [[Rhythm Mushroom]] move. This mushroom only appears in giant battles. Here are the names in other languages for this item,
| |
|
| |
| ;Refreshroom (Exclusive to the original ''Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story'')
| |
| {{foreign names
| |
| |Jpn=かいふくキノコ
| |
| |JpnR=Kaifuku Kinoko
| |
| |JpnM=Recovery Mushroom
| |
| |Fre=Champignon curatif
| |
| |FreM=Healing mushroom
| |
| |Ger=Frisch-Pilz
| |
| |GerM=Fresh Mushroom
| |
| |Ita=Grande Fungo
| |
| |ItaM=Large Mushroom
| |
| |Spa=Champiñón restaurador
| |
| |SpaM=Restorative mushroom
| |
| }}
| |
|
| |
| Admittedly, it does share a Japanese name with the normal [[Mushroom]] but all the other names including the English name, Refreshroom, are different. Given its difference in name in a majority of languages, difference in how it functions from the normal mushroom in both Inside Story and Dream Team, and slightly different appearance (bigger) from the normal mushroom, I believe there is strong enough reason to split it from its regular counterpart. I will not be including an option for splitting as "Giant Mushroom" since that verges into conjectural territory. I will include an option for splitting as "Mushroom (Giant)" since the [[Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story + Bowser Jr.'s Journey|Inside Story remake]] and [[Mario & Luigi: Dream Team]] refer to it as just mushroom. I was considering the identifiers, (''Bowser's Inside Story'') and (''Mario & Luigi'') but decided against those since one.) it appears in Dream Team as well and 2.) the other [[Refreshroom]] is also exclusive to the [[Mario & Luigi (series)|M & L games]]. I decided on the identifier, (Giant) since the mushroom itself is giant and because they only appear in the giant battles of Inside Story and Dream Team.
| |
|
| |
| '''Proposer''': {{User|Pizza Master}}<br>
| |
| '''Deadline''': February 3, 2025, 23:59 GMT
| |
|
| |
| ===Support (Split as Refreshroom (Giant))===
| |
| #{{User|Pizza Master}} Per.
| |
|
| |
| ===Support (Split as Mushroom (Giant))===
| |
| #{{User|Pizza Master}} Secondary.
| |
|
| |
| ===Oppose===
| |
|
| |
| ===Comments===
| |
| Didn't this [[Talk:Refreshroom#Split the Giant Bowser battle Refreshroom|just get merged earlier this month]]? You need to wait four weeks before you can overturn a previous proposal. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 05:36, January 20, 2025 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| I was going to point out my proposal but I got an edit conflict. Besides that, I would like to point out the name Refreshroom in all languages was replaced by Mushroom in the remake. Admittedly I did forget Dream Team features similar mushrooms so I will have to think about this before deciding what option I would pick. {{User:LadySophie17/sig}} 06:13, January 20, 2025 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Waiting a month before proposing again ==
| |
| I saw the merge but didn't pay attention to when it was merged. I'd assumed we'd have split the two mushrooms years ago since they're nothing alike but I guess not. I will retry this proposal on February 24.--{{User:Pizza Master/sig}} 18:22, January 20, 2025 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ==Split Mushroom (Monstro Town)==
| |
| {{TPP}}
| |
| This one is pretty simple. It's a mushroom that despite the identical name and appearance functions differently to the normal [[Mushroom]] and is treated as a separate item by the game itself. All the other mushrooms from [[Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars|this game]] have their own pages so why shouldn't this one, too? A good parallel to this would be the [[Lucky Hammer]] that was originally just called ''Hammer''. My [[User:Pizza Master/sandbox|sandbox page]] does a pretty good job of showing what this page would look like.
| |
|
| |
| '''Proposer''': {{User|Pizza Master}}<br>
| |
| '''Deadline''': February 26, 2025, 23:59 GMT
| |
|
| |
| ===Support===
| |
| #{{User|Pseudo}} Per proposal. This seems like a relic of the time during which the Mid Mushroom and Max Mushroom did not have their own articles and were part of the Super Mario RPG section of the Mushroom article themselves.
| |
| #{{User|FanOfYoshi}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Blinker}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Rykitu}} Different items mean different articles.
| |
| #{{User|Camwoodstock}} Makes sense to us. Different item, different article. Per proposal.
| |
| #{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Kirby the Formling}} Per all.
| |
|
| |
| ===Oppose===
| |
|
| |
| ===Comments===
| |
| What about the Hammer from Seaside Town? If we were gonna split this sort of thing, I'd've gone with that first. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 00:27, February 12, 2025 (EST)
| |
| :That one has already been split as [[Lucky Hammer]] due to being renamed in the Switch version, as mentioned in the proposal text. 08:10, February 12, 2025 (EST) {{User:Pseudo/sig}}
| |
| ::Guess I'm out-of-the-loop, hehe, I thought that was referring to when it was ''previously'' given the "name" of that by the wiki... [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 09:49, February 12, 2025 (EST)
| |