Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 380: |
Line 380: |
|
| |
|
| == Proposal: Shrooms is Shrooms == | | == Proposal: Shrooms is Shrooms == |
| {{Settled TPP}} | | |
| {{Proposal outcome|failed|9-18}}
| | {{TPP}} |
| I might be rocking the boat a little too hard here, but here goes. | | I might be rocking the boat a little too hard here, but here goes. |
|
| |
|
Line 412: |
Line 412: |
| #{{User|PrincessPeachFan}} The Dash Mushroom/Mushroom thing really gets really weird. | | #{{User|PrincessPeachFan}} The Dash Mushroom/Mushroom thing really gets really weird. |
| #{{User|Salmancer}} I would have supported this hesitantly if the main page was "Mushroom" but do fully support it as "Super Mushroom". After all, the SMR Notebook clearly says Mario is, "A hero who grows when he grabs a mushroom..." and I'm willing to take that as mushrooms not having to be called "Super Mushroom" to be Super Mushrooms. Besides, given the nature of series organization means "Dash Mushroom" as a name can still get it's fair due in a combined article. | | #{{User|Salmancer}} I would have supported this hesitantly if the main page was "Mushroom" but do fully support it as "Super Mushroom". After all, the SMR Notebook clearly says Mario is, "A hero who grows when he grabs a mushroom..." and I'm willing to take that as mushrooms not having to be called "Super Mushroom" to be Super Mushrooms. Besides, given the nature of series organization means "Dash Mushroom" as a name can still get it's fair due in a combined article. |
| #{{User|Shy Guy on Wheels}} Per proposal.
| |
| #{{User|DesaMatt}} Per proposal.
| |
| #{{User|Shadow2}} I stand by what I said [[Talk:Dash_Mushroom#Mario_Party_Superstars|two years ago]]. The unnecessary distinction between these entities is very arbitrary and is not applied consistently across the articles. We moved the things called "Mushrooms" over to the ill-fitting "Dash Mushroom" page because of some British English shenanigans, but left the Superstars/Jamboree Mushrooms on the "Mushroom" page, based entirely on their name, even though they fit the descriptiors on the "Dash Mushroom" page? However this wiki is handling it DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. These Mushrooms keep changing names inconsistently, and it's not going to do us any favors to try and follow this inconsistent naming. A basic Mushroom is just a Mushroom and we should leave it at that.
| |
|
| |
|
| ====Oppose==== | | ====Oppose==== |
Line 422: |
Line 419: |
| #{{User|Tails777}} Leaning more on this end at this moment. While my personal preference is to simply split the RPG healing "Super Mushroom" into its own article, right now, these Mushrooms are all covered pretty fairly. Plus, the opposition brings up good points with the Dash Mushroom point; it's still an official name that gets used even now. | | #{{User|Tails777}} Leaning more on this end at this moment. While my personal preference is to simply split the RPG healing "Super Mushroom" into its own article, right now, these Mushrooms are all covered pretty fairly. Plus, the opposition brings up good points with the Dash Mushroom point; it's still an official name that gets used even now. |
| #{{User|LadySophie17}} Per all. | | #{{User|LadySophie17}} Per all. |
| #{{User|Cadrega86}} Agree with Tails777, and I'd personally rather split these into something like "Mushroom" (general page for all uses that are left out), "Dash Mushroom", "Mushroom (healing item)" (for the RPGs), "Super Mushroom" (power-up), "Super Mushroom (healing item)".
| |
| #{{User|EvieMaybe}} function first! this IS mario, after all
| |
| #{{User|UltraMario}} Per all, especially Arend and Nintendo101.
| |
| #{{User|Nintendo101}} I do think there is wisdom in recognizing that subjects are often elastic in the ''Super Mario'' franchise and often serve different roles between genre: generally if it looks the same, it is intended to be seen as the same ontological subject. However, that is not always the case, and while I do think there is some truth here for this Mushroom, I think there are more meaningful distinctions not reflected in what is laid out in the proposal, and if it is to be pursued again, I'm not sure it should be merged or split in this particular way. I thought what Hewer brought up below about Dash Mushrooms in particular to be interesting. It ''is'' a contemporary term employed by the creators in Japan, and while it may not be a wholly separate entity from the Super Mushroom, we do support articles for [[Mario]] and [[Dr. Mario]] on this wiki.
| |
| #{{User|PhGuy12}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Blinker}} Per Nintendo101.
| |
| #{{User|KamekSans}} It's simple; While they may look identical, Super Mushrooms are the ones that grant Super form, while this page describes the mushrooms that ''don't'' do that.
| |
| #{{User|LinkTheLefty}} I feel like this is too broad and should be determined case by case.
| |
| #{{User|Pizza Master}} These are different mushrooms with different effects. These articles were split for a reason and should remain split. Also, a merge of these mushrooms feels like a violation of the "everything but the kitchen sink" principle tbh.
| |
| #{{User|Axii}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|Rykitu}} Per all.
| |
| #{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} Per all, especially EvieMaybe and Cadrega86. Splitting the Mushroom and Super Mushroom articles like Cadrega86 lays out and leaving the Dash Mushroom article alone would make much more sense.
| |
| #{{User|FanOfYoshi}} Per all.
| |
|
| |
|
| ====Comments==== | | ====Comments==== |
Line 459: |
Line 443: |
| ::::That's not quite what I meant. If the Super Mushroom item in ''Mario & Luigi'' increased their physical size and gave them unique moves, that would indicate some discrete intended mechanic associated with that name regardless of genre, and would (in my opinion) further substantiate a split. But it doesn't do that. It just restores more health than the regular Mushroom item. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 18:02, November 4, 2024 (EST) | | ::::That's not quite what I meant. If the Super Mushroom item in ''Mario & Luigi'' increased their physical size and gave them unique moves, that would indicate some discrete intended mechanic associated with that name regardless of genre, and would (in my opinion) further substantiate a split. But it doesn't do that. It just restores more health than the regular Mushroom item. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 18:02, November 4, 2024 (EST) |
| :::::So how do you suggest we deal with those mushrooms, since the point stands that they're clearly separate in those RPGs? I also disagree that the differing names are just "genre dependent", seeing as both "Mushroom" and "Dash Mushroom" have appeared in the Mario Party series, and both "Super Mushroom" (as an item) and "Dash Mushroom" (as a piece of equipment) appear together in Smash 4. And I again raise [[Super Star]], [[Power Star]], and [[Star (Mario Party series)]]. They all look the same, so should they be merged? {{User:Hewer/sig}} 18:17, November 4, 2024 (EST) | | :::::So how do you suggest we deal with those mushrooms, since the point stands that they're clearly separate in those RPGs? I also disagree that the differing names are just "genre dependent", seeing as both "Mushroom" and "Dash Mushroom" have appeared in the Mario Party series, and both "Super Mushroom" (as an item) and "Dash Mushroom" (as a piece of equipment) appear together in Smash 4. And I again raise [[Super Star]], [[Power Star]], and [[Star (Mario Party series)]]. They all look the same, so should they be merged? {{User:Hewer/sig}} 18:17, November 4, 2024 (EST) |
| ::::::If I recall correctly, the [[Golden Dash Mushroom]] is in ''Super Smash Bros.'', which is not the same subject. For the stars, my view is that the Star from ''Mario Party'' and the Power Star are one in the same. The Super Star is not. This impression comes from ''Super Mario 3D World'' and ''Captain Toad: Treasure Tracker'', which are related platform games and examples of them co-occuring. [[:File:Captain toad powerstar.png|''Captain Toad''{{'}}s Power Stars]] and the [[Green Star]]s (which I recognize as a type of Power Star, from its origins in ''Super Mario Galaxy'' - a game developed by much of the same people who developed ''3D World'' and ''Captain Toad'') are given rounded edges and a sheen, whereas the [[:File:Super Star Artwork - Super Mario 3D World.png|Super Star power-up]] is given sharpened points and is duller. This is not the case across all games where only one of them appears, but I always took this as an indication that they are not the same ontological subject, which is particularly notable considering the platformers are developed by Nintendo EAD/EPD which developed both of them. I do not recognize them as the same thing.
| |
| ::::::''Mario Party'' debuted on the Nintendo 64 and very early on took many design queues from ''[[Super Mario 64]]'', in which the Power Star debuted. The Stars are the main "targets" gameplay and whoever has the most wins. The impression I have is that is the role Power Stars serve in this series. The only exception I am familiar with offhand is the Stars in the Bowser mode in ''Jamboree'' which work like the power-up. But they do not function the same as the Stars do in other parts of the game and do not contribute to the player's total, so my impression is that the ones in this specific ''Jamboree'' mode can comfortably be considered the same as the Super Star power-ups, but all the other ones are analogous to Power Stars. But that is just what makes most intuitive sense to me, and others are welcomed to disagree. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 18:49, November 4, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :::::::You do not recall correctly, Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo 3DS and Wii U feature the [[Super Mushroom]] as an item and the [[Dash Mushroom]] as a piece of [[equipment]]. As for the stars, fair enough. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 18:54, November 4, 2024 (EST)
| |
| ::::::::Thank you for the clarification, but do you recognize those as comparable situations? The equipment are all [[:File:Equipment Dash Mushroom.png|featureless texture images]]. Not even discretely unique pictures. I do not find it to be the same environment for one to make an easy comparison. If the Dash Mushroom was a 3D object - either as a trophy separate from the Super Mushroom or as a physical item that increased the player's speed or gave them a boost, or even if the Super Mushroom also appeared as equipment but did something else like increase the fighter's size - I would view that as more fair. But that is not the scenario we have to look at either. - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 19:05, November 4, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :::::::::It still demonstrates that the two items can occupy different roles and have their different names within a single game, so it's not just a case of a single item named differently between games. They could easily have just called the equipment "Super Mushroom" if it was supposed to be the same item, but they didn't. I don't see how it matters that one is 3D and the other isn't when they're still both clearly visually represented in-game. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 19:21, November 4, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :I agree about the idea of the wastebasket taxon. I honestly wonder if the best solution to the issue of what to call "Super Mushroom (stronger variant)" is to just split it off into "Super Mushroom (Super Mario RPG)", "Super Mushroom (Paper Mario Series)", "Super Mushroom (Mario & Luigi Series)", and "Super Mushroom (Mario Party Series)", since those four articles are all that would be required. Maybe having "Super Mushroom (RPG Item)" would be warranted, actually, to cut down on articles that say "In this one there's a Super mushroom and it heals more than the regular one". {{User:Exiled.Serenity/sig|Sarah}} 19:27, November 4, 2024 (EST)
| |
| ::If we're merging all of the Mushroom page and most of the Super Mushroom page, I don't understand why the line should be drawn at keeping the very similar healing items merged. I also don't really like the idea of splitting pages for no reason other than avoiding awkward identifiers (especially since I suggested an alternate way of handling it in my vote that also happens to avoid awkward identifiers). {{User:Hewer/sig}} 19:39, November 4, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :::The idea here is to avoid having multiple things on the same page that are only associated by not having a better place to go. While the Mario Party and Mario RPG items are both called "Super Mushroom", they're different items that do different things and look different. Comparatively, the new "Super Mushroom" page would be unified by all being instances of The Red Mushroom From Mario, an object that is flexible in function by nature. I don't know if it's 100% necessary but I think it'd be a lot more sensible than the current setup. {{User:Exiled.Serenity/sig|Sarah}} 01:09, November 5, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Can't speak for anyone else here, but since Stars have come up several times now, I'll take the opportunity to say... yeah, that seems like the same thing as Mushrooms, so I'd support a merge of them, too. I'd have to look into it more closely before actually committing, but aside from generally more consistent nomenclature, I don't see a significant difference between the three [[Star (Mario & Wario)|(four?)]] — they still look identical, and they [[Rainbow Star|went out of their way]] to ensure two of them didn't appear in the same game. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 18:33, November 4, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :I think a consistent naming difference that perfectly aligns with a consistent functional difference is a compelling enough reason to keep them split (more so than the mushrooms, where even those that share a name will often function differently). I don't think it's an accident that the invincibility-granting one is always "Super Star", the collectible one is always "Power Star", and the Mario Party one is always just "Star". {{User:Hewer/sig}} 18:40, November 4, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Maybe after this proposal ends there can be a new policy saying that proposals affecting the names of pages that are heavily linked to shouldn't be talk page proposals. If this proposal does succeed, it would affect most pages on the wiki, since Mushrooms tend to be foundational objects in most games. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 15:44, November 6, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :Does that really matter? There's effectively no difference between a "main" proposal and a talk page proposal now that they're all the same length, and this proposal is still relevant to this talk page. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 17:05, November 6, 2024 (EST)
| |
| ::I guess it doesn't, and it does proceed off from other discussions here. I guess it's more visibility and principle where I'm concerned. This is probably cornerstone level precedent being made. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 06:17, November 8, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| The "function" argument I'm really not buying. The same argument can be made to say that [[Maple Syrup]] should be merged to [[Supersyrup Jar]], or that [[Royal Syrup]] and [[Jammin' Jelly]] should be merged to [[Ultrasyrup Jar]]. Or the [[Life Mushroom (Paper Mario series)|Life Mushroom]] should be merged to [[1-Up Mushroom]]. To say nothing on how the Fire Flower is a free-standing flame-emitter in the first two ''Paper Mario'' games rather than a power-up. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 19:18, November 6, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :To clarify, what "function argument" are you referring to? Most people bringing up function are opposing the proposal. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 03:32, November 7, 2024 (EST)
| |
| ::The one that is used in varying capacities on both sides. The one that says that since the Super Mushroom is the "basic" Mushroom in most platformers than the generic "healing" mushroom must be it rather than the stronger "healing" mushroom that is named the same as it. Or that that third one is different from both. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 12:18, November 7, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| {{@|KamekSans}} Untrue. The Super Mushroom page ''also'' covers:
| |
| * the mushrooms in Super Mario 64 DS that turn you Mega and not Super.
| |
| * the mushrooms in Yoshi's Safari that restore your life and are evidently called "Power-up Mushrooms".
| |
| * the Mid Mushrooms from Super Mario RPG that restore HP.
| |
| * the item from the Mario Party series that lets you roll three dice blocks.
| |
| * the item from the Paper Mario series that restores your health.
| |
| * the item from the Mario & Luigi series that restores your health.
| |
| * the pickups in Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games that increase the size of things ''other'' than a character.
| |
| * the item from the Luigi's Mansion remake that restores 25 HP.
| |
| * several instances of unnamed Mushroom iconography that the wiki simply ''assumes'' is of Super Mushrooms.
| |
| It is decidedly not simple. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 03:41, November 8, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :Honestly, I've been wanting to split Power-up Mushroom too, I just kept forgetting about it. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 12:16, November 8, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :A bit late here but I hard agree with this. Frankly, it feels like there are a lot of no votes here who assume that the functionality is far more cleanly deliniated by name than it actually is. It would be nice if there were only three things these mushrooms did and the distinction were clearly named, but that's frankly just not what's happening here. Dash Mushroom, maybe, if you ignore all the games where they weren't called that yet or anymore. Super vs. Regular Mushroom? It's a total mess. {{User:Exiled.Serenity/sig|Sarah}} 17:13, November 18, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| {{@|Nintendo101}} It should probably be noted that Dr. Mario is not a section of Mario mostly on sheer number of significant appearances, a series named after him, being a distinct character in Super Smash Bros. and to avoid the dreaded "talking to oneself" effect regarding the [[Super Mario (Kodansha manga)]] where he is a separate character. After Dr. Mario World had every character get a Ph.d it was decided in [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/53#Merge all doctor versions of characters into their respective article (excluding Dr. Mario)|this proposal]] that no other doctor gets to have an article, irrespective of having a new design or being recurring outside of Dr. Mario World. (Even Nurse Toadstool and Dr. Luigi, the latter of which has a game named after them.) If having a new name, lab coat and head mirror isn't good enough even as a indicator of a specific genre/brand, then things are looking rough for the items with identical appearances which "seemingly" divide by series. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 06:17, November 8, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :I see that more like how we don't have a separate page for [[Fire Luigi]]. It's not ''technically'' a "power-up," but it's a shared style of alter-ego. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 12:17, November 8, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| I also wish to point out why Schrodinger's (Super) (Dash) Mushoom is a real problem for image categorization. Like the proposal already points it out, but an example might help. Take [[:File:PN Holiday 2022 Super Mushroom.png]], supposedly a "Super Mushroom". The ornament creator where it is from only has a Super Star in it, so it can't be eliminated from any of the three Mushrooms brackets on associated items alone. The app includes paired with generic Mario artwork, so that's no help either. If Nintendo had both Super Mario and Mario Kart artwork in that app we'd be stuck with a Mushroom that can't be placed, foiled by our own flawed categorization. The only reason I can think for that art to be firmly placed in the "Super Mushroom" gallery is that non-descript red capped mushroom items with no series association are "Super Mushrooms", but that would be reading between the lines we drew ourselves. Never ever being able to be certain about what artwork presents what thing is a problem. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 06:12, November 10, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :You could say the same about splits such as [[Yoshi]] and [[Yoshi (species)]], or [[Kamek]] and [[Magikoopa]], or even [[Piranha Plant]] and [[Piranha Plant (Pit of 100 Trials)]]. Same appearance doesn't always mean same thing. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 08:49, November 10, 2024 (EST)
| |
| ::Okay, wow Piranha Plant is new to me. That's an enigma that thankfully doesn't have an independent gallery. The other two aren't issues like dividing Mushrooms are, because Yoshi is a Yoshi, and Kamek is a Magikoopa. The fallback case works for anything that cannot be conclusively stated as one or the other. (And for them, it isn't based on a quality that can be determined solely by gameplay which doesn't always exist.) Dash Mushrooms are Mushrooms, not Super Mushrooms. "The Dash Mushroom... is a type of mushroom physically identical to a Super Mushroom". And yet the indeterminites are hanging out on [[Gallery:Super Mushroom]], which sorta pokes a hole in this being a simple split where everything is in an obvious location. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 13:09, November 10, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :::here's an interesting question: can we merge galleries without merging the base pages? make a Gallery:Mushroom (or Super Mushroom) that shows normal, Super and Dash Mushrooms in one spot, maybe clarifying which is which in the image description? [[User:EvieMaybe|EvieMaybe]] ([[User talk:EvieMaybe|talk]]) 08:34, November 15, 2024 (EST)
| |
| Why on earth is the Golden Mushroom from ''Mario Party 2'' and ''Mario Party 3'' covered on the [[Super Mushroom]] article instead of [[Golden Mushroom (crownless)]]? Not only is it literally a golden Mushroom, its localized name isn't "Super Mushroom", it's "Golden Mushroom". Even if the Japanese versions of those games call it the Super Mushroom, the most common English name is prioritized per [[MarioWiki:Naming]], so they should still be covered on the Golden (non-Dash) Mushroom article. {{User:ThePowerPlayer/sig}} 12:07, November 16, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :Well, because ''not only'' has that Mushroom's Japanese name been "Super Kinoko", but the same item has also been referred to as "Super Mushroom" in later Mario Party titles, as evidenced by the [[Super 'Shroom Orb]] (or Super Mushroom Capsule). This was explained in [[Talk:Golden Mushroom#Split this page's distinct items|a prior proposal]], and is similar to why Cursed Mushroom is to be split from [[Poison Mushroom]], as decided by [[Talk:Poison Mushroom#Split Cursed Mushroom from this article|a more recent proposal]]. Not to mention that [[Talk:Orb#Merge Orbs that share names with pre-existing Mario Party series items with those items|another proposal]] has decided that certain Orbs are to be merged with their respective original items, meaning that the Super 'Shroom Orb would have to be merged to Super Mushroom anyway. {{User:Arend/sig}} 12:59, November 16, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :Also, MarioWiki:Naming is only about what to call things, not how to organise them. [[Talk:Pale Piranha#Re-re-re-merge into Piranha Plant yet again: the Squeakwel|There's]] [[Talk:Cleft#Merge Super Paper Mario Moon Cleft content here|precedent]] for basing organisation more closely on original Japanese naming despite referring to the subjects with their English names. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 22:02, November 17, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| This might be the one subject matter that rivals Banana and Cheep Cheep variants in terms of contentiousness. No wonder Mario gets so disgusted at a platter of these things in the movie. {{User:Mario/sig}} 15:52, November 16, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| While it's clear at this point that this proposal isn't going to pass at the current moment, I would like to bring up a particular point that has made me feel more strongly in support of this proposal since it came to my mind: the wiki currently considers the Dash Mushroom from ''Super Mario Party'' et al to be distinct from the Mushroom in ''Mario Party Superstars'' et al. These Mushrooms may have different names, but their appearance is identical and their effects are almost identical: adding a fixed value to the player's dice roll (even exactly equal to half of the maximum roll in both cases, which varies between games). Now, I understand why this may be and why people oppose the merge, but consider this: how is this different from the Mushroom that appears in early games of the ''Mario Kart'' series, before the name Dash Mushroom was used in either English or Japanese? ''[[Super Mario Kart]]'' is one example of this. If we are to strictly split these pages based on their differing names and regardless of their shared appearance or effects, should ''Super Mario Kart''{{'}}s Mushroom be split from the current Dash Mushroom article (and put on the Mushroom article)? I do not actually think this would be a good idea to be clear, I'm more trying to point out the issues with having these articles be split as they are. I hope this is food for thought on the subject, at least. {{User:Pseudo/sig}} 16:19, November 18, 2024 (EST)
| |
| :This argument was already had [[Talk:Dash Mushroom#Mario Party Superstars|here]]. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 20:06, November 18, 2024 (EST)
| |
| ::Fair enough I guess, though I didn't personally see or participate in this (and wasn't very active on the wiki at that time), and do still think it's a relevant point to make. {{User:Pseudo/sig}} 20:10, November 18, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| A bit of a "postmortem" in the final hour of this proposal: I know it's two-to-one against this passing, but given how many opposing votes there are, I'm a bit pleased with even that, especially with some of the passionate support for it. I feel like it'd be bad form for me to try this proposal again with no executional changes (immediately, at least), but if someone else figures out how to do this in a way that satisfies everyone, or just feels strongly enough to run it back, I'll back them every step of the way — I still stand by everything I said in the proposal, after all. (Maybe make it a proposal-page proposal this time, like Salmancer said.) As for myself, in a month or two, I might make a proposal to just split the strong variants out of the Super Mushroom article. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 18:24, November 18, 2024 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Split Refreshroom (Giant) ==
| |
| {{settled TPP}}
| |
| {{proposal outcome|vetoed|Too early to overturn [[Talk:Refreshroom#Split the Giant Bowser battle Refreshroom|this proposal]]}}
| |
| This is not just an ordinary mushroom. Like the [[Dash Mushroom]] that shares the same appearance as the normal [[Mushroom]], the '''Refreshroom''' from [[Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story]] shares a similar appearance but functions differently from its normal counterpart and is given a separate name (Admittedly, just in the original release). Unlike the [[Mario & Luigi (series)|M & L]] Mushroom that just heals 30 hp for either bro (and [[Bowser]] if he gets one from an enemy) this heals 50% of [[Giant Bowser]]'s health. In [[Mario & Luigi: Dream Team]], this item functions differently than in Inside Story as a mushroom that heals [[Giant Luigi]] just a bit more than a single small mushroom from the [[Rhythm Mushroom]] move. This mushroom only appears in giant battles. Here are the names in other languages for this item,
| |
|
| |
| ;Refreshroom (Exclusive to the original ''Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story'')
| |
| {{foreign names
| |
| |Jpn=かいふくキノコ
| |
| |JpnR=Kaifuku Kinoko
| |
| |JpnM=Recovery Mushroom
| |
| |Fre=Champignon curatif
| |
| |FreM=Healing mushroom
| |
| |Ger=Frisch-Pilz
| |
| |GerM=Fresh Mushroom
| |
| |Ita=Grande Fungo
| |
| |ItaM=Large Mushroom
| |
| |Spa=Champiñón restaurador
| |
| |SpaM=Restorative mushroom
| |
| }}
| |
|
| |
| Admittedly, it does share a Japanese name with the normal [[Mushroom]] but all the other names including the English name, Refreshroom, are different. Given its difference in name in a majority of languages, difference in how it functions from the normal mushroom in both Inside Story and Dream Team, and slightly different appearance (bigger) from the normal mushroom, I believe there is strong enough reason to split it from its regular counterpart. I will not be including an option for splitting as "Giant Mushroom" since that verges into conjectural territory. I will include an option for splitting as "Mushroom (Giant)" since the [[Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story + Bowser Jr.'s Journey|Inside Story remake]] and [[Mario & Luigi: Dream Team]] refer to it as just mushroom. I was considering the identifiers, (''Bowser's Inside Story'') and (''Mario & Luigi'') but decided against those since one.) it appears in Dream Team as well and 2.) the other [[Refreshroom]] is also exclusive to the [[Mario & Luigi (series)|M & L games]]. I decided on the identifier, (Giant) since the mushroom itself is giant and because they only appear in the giant battles of Inside Story and Dream Team.
| |
|
| |
| '''Proposer''': {{User|Pizza Master}}<br>
| |
| '''Deadline''': February 3, 2025, 23:59 GMT
| |
|
| |
| ===Support (Split as Refreshroom (Giant))===
| |
| #{{User|Pizza Master}} Per.
| |
|
| |
| ===Support (Split as Mushroom (Giant))===
| |
| #{{User|Pizza Master}} Secondary.
| |
|
| |
| ===Oppose===
| |
|
| |
| ===Comments===
| |
| Didn't this [[Talk:Refreshroom#Split the Giant Bowser battle Refreshroom|just get merged earlier this month]]? You need to wait four weeks before you can overturn a previous proposal. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 05:36, January 20, 2025 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| I was going to point out my proposal but I got an edit conflict. Besides that, I would like to point out the name Refreshroom in all languages was replaced by Mushroom in the remake. Admittedly I did forget Dream Team features similar mushrooms so I will have to think about this before deciding what option I would pick. {{User:LadySophie17/sig}} 06:13, January 20, 2025 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Waiting a month before proposing again ==
| |
| I saw the merge but didn't pay attention to when it was merged. I'd assumed we'd have split the two mushrooms years ago since they're nothing alike but I guess not. I will retry this proposal on February 24.--{{User:Pizza Master/sig}} 18:22, January 20, 2025 (EST)
| |