Talk:List of New Super Mario Bros. pre-release and unused content
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Poor Write-Up[edit]
This page seems poorly-written to me. 72.49.66.9 14:35, 19 October 2015 (EDT)
Beta Image?[edit]
File:BigFirePiranhaPlantNSMBDS.PNG --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 00:59, 15 January 2016 (EST)
- It is a screenshot of a rom hack. It depicts an unused actor shooting a fireball. --Hiccup (talk) 06:14, 15 January 2016 (EST)
- Similar to Blargg from Super Mario 64. I take it this image will be OK for use in this article? I was going through Special:UnusedFiles and found it. It doesn't seem to be covered. --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 16:19, 15 January 2016 (EST)
- If it is confirmed to be a beta item, it deserves a mention in this list. If it is not in the game files, but some clever hacker managed to make it using complicated codes and stuff. It doesn't deserve a mention in this list.-- 16:30, 15 January 2016 (EST)
- It is a genuine unused actor. But it doesn't use any unused graphics, so an image is unnecessary. --Hiccup (talk) 17:43, 15 January 2016 (EST)
- Doesn't it qualify for unused code or something? I mean if it is just an enlarged version of the standard Fire Piranha Plant or cut Big Venus Fire Trap but the code for enlargement went unused in level maps, I say it belongs in the article. --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 19:11, 15 January 2016 (EST)
- It is a genuine unused actor. But it doesn't use any unused graphics, so an image is unnecessary. --Hiccup (talk) 17:43, 15 January 2016 (EST)
- If it is confirmed to be a beta item, it deserves a mention in this list. If it is not in the game files, but some clever hacker managed to make it using complicated codes and stuff. It doesn't deserve a mention in this list.-- 16:30, 15 January 2016 (EST)
- Similar to Blargg from Super Mario 64. I take it this image will be OK for use in this article? I was going through Special:UnusedFiles and found it. It doesn't seem to be covered. --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 16:19, 15 January 2016 (EST)