Editing Mario Party
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 397: | Line 397: | ||
In contrast, gaming magazine ''{{wp|Game Informer}}'' viewed the game with much contempt.<ref>{{cite|date=March 1999|title=''Game Informer'' #71|page=36}}</ref> All three reviewers note that the minigames are boring and those playing will not derive much enjoyment. Out of the three reviewers, Paul Anderson was the most charitable and gave the game an overall score of 5.5/10. However, he says the game is worthless and only serves to fill the first quarter of the year. [[Nintendo]] of America sent the magazine a sarcastic certificate over the publication's negative review of ''Mario Party'' and its sequel.<ref>{{cite|author=Ryckert, Dan|date=September 18, 2000|deadlink=y|archive=web.archive.org/web/20160913103433/http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2010/09/18/replay-mario-party-3.aspx?PageIndex=11|title=Replay - ''Mario Party 3''|publisher=Game Informer|accessdate=June 21, 2024}}</ref> From then on, ''Game Informer'' became infamous for their constantly negative reviews of the ''[[Mario Party (series)|Mario Party]]'' games, which usually get a positive reception from critics such as IGN and GameSpot, and their picky reputation has stuck since. | In contrast, gaming magazine ''{{wp|Game Informer}}'' viewed the game with much contempt.<ref>{{cite|date=March 1999|title=''Game Informer'' #71|page=36}}</ref> All three reviewers note that the minigames are boring and those playing will not derive much enjoyment. Out of the three reviewers, Paul Anderson was the most charitable and gave the game an overall score of 5.5/10. However, he says the game is worthless and only serves to fill the first quarter of the year. [[Nintendo]] of America sent the magazine a sarcastic certificate over the publication's negative review of ''Mario Party'' and its sequel.<ref>{{cite|author=Ryckert, Dan|date=September 18, 2000|deadlink=y|archive=web.archive.org/web/20160913103433/http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2010/09/18/replay-mario-party-3.aspx?PageIndex=11|title=Replay - ''Mario Party 3''|publisher=Game Informer|accessdate=June 21, 2024}}</ref> From then on, ''Game Informer'' became infamous for their constantly negative reviews of the ''[[Mario Party (series)|Mario Party]]'' games, which usually get a positive reception from critics such as IGN and GameSpot, and their picky reputation has stuck since. | ||
{|class="wikitable | {|class="wikitable reviews" | ||
!colspan="4"style="font-size:120%;text-align:center;background-color:silver;"|Reviews | !colspan="4"style="font-size:120%;text-align:center;background-color:silver;"|Reviews | ||
|-style="background-color:#E6E6E6" | |-style="background-color:#E6E6E6" |