Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Blooper

__NOTOC__
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{FANOMFAIL
|nominated=15:18, 4 April 2014 (EST)
|lastedit=20:18, 4 May 2014
}}
==== Support ====
#{{User|bluetoad63}} No flowery stuff, nothing "captain obvious" like, and of good length. Only thing is the stub section, which can be expanded easily without padding, I think.

==== Oppose ====
#<s>{{User|Baby Luigi}} Section-stub at DDR Mario Mix. Can't have that. Bloopers DO have a gameplay function and play a role in the story.</s>
#<s>{{User|Mario}} At a glance, there are too many one-liner sections which can be merged into one section. Also, the "general information" section can be expanded. "Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story" can provide more details about the Blooper subspecies, but just a bit more. Also, the stub template is there and some sections violate the [[MarioWiki:Empty Section Policy|Empty Section]] policy. I don't think it's quite fit to be featured yet.</s>
#{{User|Vommack}}Numerous one-liners, in addition to the stub section.
#{{User|Fandro}} Per Mario and Vommack.

==== Removal of Opposes ====
;Vommack
#{{User|Mario}} The one-liners are reduced to a more reasonable amount, and the stub section has been sufficiently expanded. Your vote is now invalid.
;Fandro
#{{User|Stonehill}} ...which makes ''this'' vote invalid too.

==== Comments ====
I'm pretty sure most, if not all, problems are fixed, but considering the inactivity of this nomination, I think I'm going to renominate this the month after it fails (which is such a long time). Or, I can just ignore the damn rules. {{User:Mario/sig}} 21:01, 16 May 2014 (EDT)

@Stonehill: Well, that vote is going to be automatically removed once that vote is removed... but IF more than one user, including a friggin' "admin", votes to remove that vote. {{User:Mario/sig}} 15:33, 22 May 2014 (EDT)