MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Wario Land 3

Wario Land 3

Support

1. Mr bones (talk) Well written, only one red link, sufficient images.
2. Fuzzipede27 (talk)
3. Mukumukuluma (talk)

Oppose

1. Booderdash (talk) In construction. Ironic how you nominated it first THEN start adding the enemies you forgot. Plus, theres grammar issues everywhere. Seriously, undefeated enemy? Blue UFO still has problems there.
2. Edofenrir (talk) - This article still has some flaws. The story section doesn't sort the events in the game in chronological order (which should be the case since it's basically a report). The gameplay section is way too short. It only talks about the most basic stuff which you could read everywhere. There is no mention of the control pattern or Wario's skills, and upgrades of said skills aren't explained sufficiently. The article doesn't mention how you complete a level, how you have to find treasures to open new ways on the map. It neither mentions nor explains the golfing minigame, which is an essential part of the game. The article has no critical reception section. It claims the day and night system is only cosmetical, which is flat-out not true. So yeah.

Comments

Although the article looks fine, I think it would be more consistent if the enemies were also arranged on a table like the bosses. Fawfulfury65 (talk)

If that makes the article better, then I'll do that.Mr bones (talk)

Okay! I'm done with that Mr bones (talk)

It wouldn't hurt if the enemies whose official names are unknown are also listed by conjectural names. --Grandy02 (talk)

I see. I'm not good at naming enemies. But I'll try. I don't think there are too many. Like the mole, the roof slimes, the spiked slimes...Mr bones (talk)

Why not make a description for the attack patterns and descriptions of the bosses (along with the location in the same table cell)? The enemies have one. This article looks great, by the way. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

Also, is it okay if I replace the transformations section in the article with sprites instead of game art? We already have gameart on the bottom of the article. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

@Booderdash The enemies I'm adding have unofficial names. I never though I'll add them! And yes, undefeated exists! Any other mistakes you spotted? LGM, the transformations section is okay, arts are better.Mr bones (talk)

"Undefeated" IS a word, but I think it is not used correctly. "Undefeated" is like in "undefeated champion". Invincible enemies are not "undefeated". LeftyGreenMario (talk)

And I got another problem. It would be nice to see all the gameart have transparency, but that's a minor issue. It would look better on other people's monobooks. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

that's not the article's problem, it's the images' problem. When I looked in the dictionary, (I have the british one) it says undefeated means unbeatable, invincible.Mr bones (talk)

Hiya, Mr. Bones. I could make the sprites transparent if you really want me to. Do you think they might need transparency? BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

you will help Wario? Anyway, I think your sister meant the gamearts, not the sprites. I'd appreciate if you make the sprites transaprant though.Mr bones (talk)

I meant sprites. She said gameart. Ok, I'll do it. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

Undefeated is not a form of invincible or maybe you thought UNDEFEATABLE, not undefeated. That word means they haven't been defeated meaning it is a single character. Plus theres still grammar issues in the article. PS, I know,LGM that undefeated is a word as used in Bowser lost again, making Goomboss once again undefeated, but not Blue UFO is an undefeated enemy, implying they fought but wario lost or something to that extent Booderdash (talk)

An can you point out some of the grammar issues?Mr bones (talk)