User talk:Time Turner/Archive 6

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
< User talk:Time Turner
Revision as of 16:14, May 29, 2010 by Count Bonsula (talk | contribs) (plan of revange huh?)
Jump to navigationJump to search

User:Reversinator/status

Reversinator's pages of talking

Hello to all MarioWiki users! I'm Reversinator, and you presumably came to my talk page to talk to me. So here's the rules you must remember:

  1. Sign all of your comments so I know who left it.
  2. Spelling and grammar are extremely prefered.
  3. No vandalism, no trolling, no spamming, blah blah blah.
  4. I will reply to you on your talk page.
  5. I am fluent in French, English and Portugese, so if you wish to talk to me in any of those languages, feel free to.
  6. Try to be civil, but still have a sense of humor. In other words, no leet, no swearing, no threatning, blah blah blah.
  7. Whenver starting a new conversation, put it under a new header.
  8. My signature is and will always be Hello, I'm Time Turner.

Everybody got that? Good. Now talk to me!

Re:FA's

Definitely. I'll get on the nominations straight away. Just send me a link to the talk archives and I'll do those, too. BLOC PARTIER. 20:42, 30 April 2010 (EDT)

Done. And yep, they're all on the FA page. I've got one or two done already. BLOC PARTIER. 21:18, 30 April 2010 (EDT)
Alrighty, I'm pretty sure I got all the old noms archived. Feel free to check it out and tell me if I'm wrong. :P BLOC PARTIER. 21:18, 30 April 2010 (EDT)

I already told Bloc Partier on his talk page: There is no such rule as to delete nominations that exceed 2 months! Please read the rules more carefully in future. Time Questions 14:23, 1 May 2010 (EDT)

Yes, but he edited it so it said: "So, the only nominations that will be deleted are the ones that have lasted for more than 4 months, and that have at least a .5:1 opposers to supporters ratio." Time Questions 06:33, 2 May 2010 (EDT)

Somewhat Amusing Stuff

Shroombull.png Hello, Time Turner/Archive 6! Shroombull.png

Please Please PM me your 'Shroom Fun Stuff section before May 12thth. If you can't finish it, talk to me (I'm lonely!) and I'll smack you with a rake work something out with you.


Thanks,
Your Lazy Director

-LuigiZ3r0 Tw0Zerotwo.jpg

Ah, that's too bad. I'll remove your name from the sign-up list, then. LuigiZ3r0 Tw0Zerotwo.jpg

L Button/R Button

For Mario Kart Super Circuit, isn't the L Button to use items, while the R Button is used to hop/drift? Rosalina costume pose in Super Mario Maker Mario JC

RE: Question

It was an accident. I didn't realize that I accidentally deleted a section until you told me. KS3 (talk · contribute) 20:09, 5 May 2010 (EDT)

I forgot. KS3 (talk · contribute) 20:16, 5 May 2010 (EDT)
I don't see it now for some reason. KS3 (talk · contribute) And Pie is awesome
It was in my archive. KS3 (talk · contribute) 20:25, 5 May 2010 (EDT)

Back on track, The reason why I did it was because on RAP's talk page it says that you aren't allowed to have infoboxes on your page. KS3 (talk · contribute) 20:29, 5 May 2010 (EDT)

And I promise to read stuff more carefully. KS3 (talk · contribute) 20:35, 5 May 2010 (EDT)

Thanks...

And I remembered I did 4 reminders. KS3 (talk · contribute) 20:39, 5 May 2010 (EDT)

Yes, They were Nintendude, FireBabyLuigi11, LeftyGreenMario, and BabyWeegeeOnFire. KS3 (talk · contribute) 20:50, 5 May 2010 (EDT) And a random thing

Not related to MarioWiki, but....

Since you were here more, I figured I'd tell you here. Anyways, both the KDL2 sprites and the KA icons you uploaded to Kirby Wiki are recolors.--Starman125 11:33, 10 May 2010 (EDT)

Warning

Warning.svg This is a warning to stop your inappropriate behavior (calling a sysop stupid) on the Super Mario Wiki. Please adhere to the rules or you will be blocked from editing this site.
If you feel this warning was undeserved, you may appeal it.

--Tucayo (talk)

Calling my edit stupid is like calling me stupid. And, dumb or not, it is a controversy about the game, and as a wiki we must cover every aspect of the game. Also, admins agreed on this. --TucayoSig.png The 'Shroom 18:52, 10 May 2010 (EDT)
I think Edo answered your wuestion on Time Q's talk. ----TucayoSig.png The 'Shroom 12:47, 11 May 2010 (EDT)

reversing copy-edits

Hey Reversinator -- an exchange from a bit back:

[me:] I'm a bit more stumped on the reversion of the prose edits:

Converting passive to active voice, getting rid of awkward constructs like 'a high quantity of', merging the exact same info presented twice in different ways

[you:] The way it was previously worded was perfectly fine.

Your argument seems to be "don't improve prose if was understandable, even if it was poorly written." Before re-reversing such changes, I'd ask you to consider why (say) you think passive voice is better than active, or that awkward phrasings should be preserved and never improved, etc. Cheers,

not-just-yeti 11:24, 12 May 2010 (EDT)