MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story

Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story

Support

1. MATEOELBACAN (talk) This article is very detailed,has much images,sections this must be a FA!
2. Baby Mario Bloops (talk) - Now that it is all organized (with some very very minor things I would like to change) this is perfect for a FA. MATEOELBACAN, I was going to nominate it...but that's okay. This has every single requirement all completed.
3. Marioguy1 (talk) - Like mateo said, this article has "much images" and is the proper length with enough detail.
4. Dimenshi Knight (talk) - Like all the reasons mention above, Dimenshi will side with the support as usual. Thy article has many great features and touches many other articles don't have. It is amazingly outstanding, and met every requirement known to FA's. This will probably pass in a short while...
5. Luigi456 - this Article is really good.
6. Mario304 - Per Luigi456.
7. Nihaho13 - ...YESH!! YESH!!
8. Electrobomber (talk) - Quite the article. I'd have to say this is the first, and best piece of work that the "generation" of users that I belong to has done by far. I wish we could do this well on some of the other articles :P
9. User:Super Bowser Jr. - Per MATEOELBACAN

Oppose

1. Fawfulfury65 (talk) - Actually, we need more pictures, there should be one at least in every section. Pictures can be added near the end of the story and on the overworld section and the battle sections under it. Also, in the enemies section, there are sprites of two random enemies, and they look stupid there. More work should be done on pictures. I'll support once there's more, and I'll even add some pics myself here.
2. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) - per Fawful. The Gameplay Differences and Enemies section is in especially in need of images.
3. LeftyGreenMario (talk) - Although there are plentiful images in some sections, some other sections (especially near the end of storyline part) are barren wastelands of text. Those random sprites of enemies should get removed also.
4. Super mario fan (talk) - No offense, but both the battle section is s*** bad. It has information that is not true and also some of the trivia could fit in the gameplay differences. Gameplay differeces in Trivia. And the release difference could just be in the trivia.
5. Paperwaluigi (talk) - It's surprisingly incorrect in places.
6. Redstar (talk) - The article is riddled with bad writing, grammar issues, and typos that cannot be corrected in a simple sweep. They are so ingrained in the writing that it must be looked over several times and re-written again and again before it's anywhere near readable. The Enemies sections is largely composed of nothing but tables, which should be split off into a Bestiary article akin to the Paper Mario article. This article is close to being filled-out, but it's only an essay seemingly written the night before due-date. It needs polishing.

Removal of Supports

• MATEOELBACAN - Your only viable reason is that the article is "detailed". How is it detailed?
• Luigi456 - Why is it "really good"?
• Mario304 - If Luigi456 is vague, then you must explain yourself as well.
• Nihaho13 - "...YESH!! YESH!!" is not a suitable reason.
• Super Bowser Jr. - Since you're agreeing with MATEOELBACAN, you must also elaborate.

1. Redstar (talk) - Per above reasons.

Comments

Needs a longer summary for a nice introduction Coincollector (talk)

If you think so, you should actually oppose. Time Q (talk)

The article is riddled with bad writing, grammar issues, and typos that cannot be corrected in a simple sweep. They are so ingrained in the writing that it must be looked over several times and re-written again and again before it's anywhere near readable. The Enemies sections is largely composed of nothing but tables, which should be split off into a Bestiary article akin to the Paper Mario article. This article is close to being filled-out, but it's only an essay seemingly written the night before due-date. It needs polishing. Redstar 00:11, 29 November 2009 (EST)