Talk:Dragon Wario (Wario Land: Super Mario Land 3)

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Revision as of 22:41, December 1, 2008 by Son of Suns (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Should Dragon Wario be included in the Dragon Category and Template? - Walkazo

No, because it's a form of Wario, not an actual dragonn Artwork of a Bob-omb, from Mario Kart Wii.Goomb-ombArtwork of a Goomba in New Super Mario Bros. (later used in Mario Super Sluggers, New Super Mario Bros. Wii and Super Mario Run)
Id like to counter that. The Ice Template has Ice Mario and Ice Luigi in it. Why can't the Dragon template have Dragon Wario then? Super-YoshiMust...eat...sig...Talk? C???

Fire Creatures

Wario isn't really a creature, so could I remove him from this template?

Goomb-omb 14:31, 1 December 2008 (EST)

No, the Fire Template shows everything that is associated with fire, including Wario. As for "creature", my dictionary's definition is "anything created, especially a living being" which means Wario is a creature. We went with the name "creature" because of this universality: it covers characters (i.e. Wario), species (animals and plants) and things that are neither (like ghosts, and half the things on the template). - Walkazo 22:24, 1 December 2008 (EST)
The fire template seems pretty pointless. Does anyone actually use it to navigate through "fire" articles? Is it even helpful? -- Son of Suns (talk)
No not really. Many fire creatures have appeared in the Mario series, and it would also make some templates like the Ice and Dragon templates kinda awkward if we consider that. Think about it..."Does anyone need to navigate through Dragon articles?" IMO, the more templates an article has, the better it is. Super-YoshiMust...eat...sig...Talk? C???
I've used it to research species that use fire, and I've used the Dragon template for the same reasons. It's interesting and useful from a scientific point of view. - Walkazo 22:39, 1 December 2008 (EST)
But a category does exactly the same thing, and in an orderly way (not scrunched links all crammed into a little box). I disagree with you Super-Yoshi - I think templates need to be extremely functional, or else they are pointless. More templates does not make an article better. Too many can make it worse. This wiki over-creates templates. Not every category needs a template - the category does it's job just fine. Along with this fire one, we should also probably consider getting rid of the Ice and Dragon ones as well. -- Son of Suns (talk)