Category talk:Disambiguation

Should we create disambiguation pages that only link to two pages? Seems a bit minor to me.Knife (talk) 15:56, 23 August 2007 (EDT)

We already have some of those, and I think we shouldn't have them... ~Uniju(T-C-E)

I agree, the articleabout template works best if its only two pages. -- Sir Grodus

I Agree although the peekaboo page should stay..Xzelion^ETC

A disambig page for two articles may be necessary if both topics are of relatively equal importance. -- Son of Suns

Current policy is a minimum of four pages as per proposal. Yet randomly sampling through the category shows that the majority fails to reach that requirement. It might be the mostly widely disregarded rule in this wiki. This rule might as well not exist.--Platform (talk) 04:54, February 5, 2025 (EST)

Three or more links (previously four) now adds the article to this category, so it would necessitate a disambiguation page with three entries at that point. The policy page is just outdated. Mario JC 05:15, February 7, 2025 (EST)

It feels like half the entries in this category only have two links.--Platform (talk) 22:51, February 7, 2025 (EST)