Thank You!
Thanks a lot for the compliment! Right now, I/m trying to get these articles up and running, but once I'm done, I'll do my best to expand them! :)
VERY Sorry
I am very, Very, VERY sorry for all the trouble I have caused you. From now on, no more contribution-deletion, bad grammar, or Wikipedia replication for me!! Thanks you very much for sending me those messages to let me know. By the way, I'll be re-doing those pages that got deleted once again, but I can GARANTEE 100% that I won't be porting text, believe me. I love the site, and I do not want to make big messes, I want to help fix them. Oh, one last thing. What happend to that guy who was vandalizing the Mario Page? And if I made trouble by trying to correct it, I was just trying to help but I couldn't remember the picture description. I sincerely hope you'll forgive me.
Again
Again with the Peachycakes/Daisygirl troll. Our friend has a new moniker: Irmagirl. Can you do the honors? Thanks. Monty Mole 19:41, 18 September 2006 (EDT)
Maybe we should recommend the Uncyclopedia for this troll's false articles. However, even the Uncyclopedia has standards.... -- Son of Suns
- It does? Superchao 19:45, 21 September 2006 (EDT)
- Uncyclopedia is supposed to have a sense of irony. Pure nonsense is not worth an article. For example, the article on nihilism is completely blank. Also, the article for Mario Party is about an Italian political party. However, nonsense, of course, will appear in a wiki based on false information. -- Son of Suns
- And this troll's articles are so stupid, I don't think even Uncyclopedia will accept them.
Thanks
Heh, thanks. =P Yeah, I'll be sure to stay here for quite a while, and when Super Mario Galaxy comes out, I'll enhance any SMG articles on the wiki hopefully. --Kelt 19:10, 24 September 2006 (EDT)
Archive...
Can you make me a talk archive? Superchao 19:37, 24 September 2006 (EDT)
PLEASE!MSuperchao 20:11, 24 September 2006 (EDT)
Could you delete an article
The article Dark World (glitch) is a copy of Dark World. Could you please delete the copy?Waluigi Freak 99 18:33, 25 September 2006 (EDT)
Template
I've made a template for the Special Shots, but it's too long vertically. Can you split it into two columns? Monty Mole (Talk·Contribs) 15:47, 26 September 2006 (EDT)
Okay...
Our IM conversation made NO sense. Superchao 23:28, 30 September 2006 (EDT)
17
Sorry for causing so much trouble on the whole 17 deal. I guess I still need some time to get used to sysoping. I hope you're not mad. Monty Mole (Talk·Contribs) 19:57, 4 October 2006 (EDT)
Rules
I see many people getting blocked messages and are confused as to how they did something wrong. Don't you think some set-in-stone rules (or at least guidelines) should be added to the site, in stead of the unwritten ones we have now?
Waluigi Freak 99 13:56, 6 October 2006 (EDT)
- I didn't say there was complaining, just that there was confusion, because no set guidelines are seen anywhere on the site.Waluigi Freak 99 17:29, 6 October 2006 (EDT)
I forgot one of the characters when I was making the table. Could you set it up again so that the columns are equal and Cactuar is by himself in the center of the bottom row? Thanks in advance. Monty Mole (Talk·Contribs) 18:59, 10 October 2006 (EDT)
Boring captions...
These new captions are boring and REDUNDANT. Superchao 19:05, 16 October 2006 (EDT)
- Regardless, the captions should be informative. This is an encyclopedia, not a comedy club. They can still be interesting, just not silly or crude. Be creative in your descriptions! -- Son of Suns
- Well, if they are exactly what's in the picture, that's redundant. Show me ONE caption that has ANY humor left. Superchao 19:10, 16 October 2006 (EDT)
- Captions are supposed to inform people what is in a picture. That's the point of captions in the first place. There isn't supposed to be much humor in the captions. However, in the Zombone article, the pic has a caption that makes reference to Greek mythology, while the Ninji article has a pic with a caption about the pixels of the creature. -- Son of Suns
- Yeah, but can't we have a little humor in a caption? I mean, I think my Dark Bristle caption is good. Superchao 19:23, 16 October 2006 (EDT)
Sorry, but I don't see the point of describing the image exactly. I mean, then someone might not even WANT to look at the image! Superchao 20:51, 16 October 2006 (EDT)
Because they would know everything about it, so they would see no point! Is it okay if there is a little humor? Superchao 20:57, 16 October 2006 (EDT)
|
