Talk:X-Naut ship

If it's conjecturally named..., do we need this article?--Knife (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2009 (EST)

Many articles are named with conjectured titles, yet we maintain them. But, considering the shortness of this example, we could probably merge it to either Lord Crump's or the X-Naut page (I favor the latter). Redstar 18:13, 18 December 2009 (EST)

Yes, but we only give articles to conjecturally named subjects if they have some significance, like an enemy in SML2. However, the ship used by the X-Nauts in one chapter doesn't seem to be notable, especially since Nintendo didn't give it an official name.--Knife (talk) 18:27, 18 December 2009 (EST)

My impression as well. If all relevant information is merged into either Lord Crump's or the X-Naut page, in either the story section or a new section, then I think this page could be deleted. Redstar 18:29, 18 December 2009 (EST)

Definitely. But, seeing as the ship belongs to Lord Crump, not the X-Nauts, I think it should be merged with Lord Crump. User:Dry Paratroopa/sig

Rename

This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

This seems like an overly flashy name in my opinion. Even "X-Naut ship" would be better. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 18:33, December 28, 2023 (EST)