Talk:Dark Bristle

I don't think Dark Bristle is deserves to have its own article and should go under Bristle because it is a sub-specie and not different enough. I don't mean delete but to merge. Plus Bristle already has most of the info on Dark Bristle--Spike 14:12, 3 September 2006 (EDT)

Well most other subspecies have their own article. Superchao 15:37, 3 September 2006 (EDT)

I know but this sub-specie is simply a recolor of the original and stronger. If it was more different it could be considered separate but it is not. That is also why I changed the redlinks for the different PM2 Dry Bones to the original one.--Spike 15:46, 3 September 2006 (EDT)

Well, look at Dark Boo!

I know but PM subspecies are still not different enough. I'll have to merge those enemies too. Basically I'll just add the pictures. Yours is just the first I've noticed. If you want to create a new article in PM just add a place or a character. We've already got enough PM enemies--Spike 16:09, 3 September 2006 (EDT)

Actually, it would be better to leave them as is.

If I may interject, I believe an article on every enemy in the PM series would be preferable. Monty Mole 16:17, 3 September 2006 (EDT)

I support that! Superchao 16:18, 3 September 2006 (EDT)

Whoops! Sorry I just realized that it was a pipe project. I think I will join you to make up for it. Anyway should the tattle info under the main specie at the subspecie be deleted and be replaced by a link because it doesnt make sense that the same info is on two pages?--Spike 16:33, 3 September 2006 (EDT)

Done. Superchao 16:37, 3 September 2006 (EDT)