MarioWiki:Proposals

Proposals can be new features (such as an extension), removal of a previously added feature that has tired out, or new policies that must be approved via consensus before any action(s) are done. Any user can support or oppose, but must have a strong reason for doing so, not, e.g., "I like this idea!" "Vote" periods last for one week. All past proposals are archived. A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed with the signature code ~~~(~). How To Actions that users feel are appropriate to have community approval first can be added by anyone, but they must have a strong argument. Users then vote and discuss on the issue during that week. The "deadline" for the proposal is one week from posting at: Monday to Thursday: 17:00 (5pm) Friday and Saturday: 20:00 (8pm) Sunday: 15:00 (3pm) Every vote should have a reason accompanying it. At any time a vote may be rejected if at least three active users believe the vote truly has no merit or was cast in bad faith. However, there must be strong reasons supporting the invalidation. "# " should be added under the last vote of each support/oppose section to show another blank line. At the deadline, the validity of each vote and the discussion is reviewed by the community. Any proposal that has three votes or less at deadline will automatically be listed as 'NO QUORUM' A user calls the result of the proposal and takes action(s) as decided if necessary, and archives the proposal. The times are in EDT, and are set so that the user is more likely to be online at those times (after school, weekend nights). So for example, if a proposal is added on Saturday night at 11:59 PM EDT, the deadline is the next Saturday night at 8:00 PM. If it is indeed a minute later, the deadline is a day plus 15 hours (Sunday), as opposed to a day minus 4 hours. CURRENTLY: 18:51, 29 November 2024 (EDT) New Features Special Mainpage I think that the main page should be more holday wise like for instance, Halloween is coming and we can put the page full of Halloween colors and some pics created by user to go on the main page. Proposer: King Mario Deadline: 21:55 Nov. 3rd Put this on the page when holidays are coming up King Mario Don't put this on the page when holdays are coming up ~Uniju(T-C-E)Waste of time. Dumb idea anyway... N/O. My Bloody Valentine I had to think about this one. But, sorry, we should try NOT to add Fanart to the Main Page. Also, it would be too much trouble to try and make the Main Page look different. XzelionETC Per all Alphaclaw11 no some people(not saying me) dont celebrate some holidays. Cobold (talk · contribs) Per all. It's still fine for you to create your own version of the Main Page, where you use the special templates and bookmark that. Noone's going to stop you to apply special colors to that. ~PY -Does that have to do with Mario? No! Master Crash Thats what userpages are for. Walkazo - Per PY and Glowsquid. Comments I could see a special main-page for April Fool, but otherwise, that seem pretty useless. Glowsquid Removals Recently on the MarioWiki... This section is the least updated on the Main Page, as there just isn't enough news to fill it with. Usually, there is only one section of news worth noting, and that always goes on the sitenotice. Deadline: 20:00, Nov. 10 Plumber 21:33, 3 November 2007 (EDT) Support Plumber 21:33, 3 November 2007 (EDT) Oppose Comments Quotes? Lately i've been searching around the wikis quotes, and have seen quotes like "whupee heeheeheehee!" when thats just a bunch of giberious and also something like AHHH!!! thats just someone yelling! should we get rid of these? Proposer: Master Crash Deadline: 22:00, Nov. 4th Remove Master Crash my Reason is given above Glowsquid I agree, quotes like "AHHHH!!!!" are useless and make the wiki look less professional. Luigibros2 they are very useless quotes that make us seem like we well add any thing to articles. My Bloody Valentine A perfect example of a good quote, can be seen on Snake's article. Quotes like "AHHHH!!!!" have no meaning, as Glowsquid says. €zlo Zakor1138 'Nuff said. ~PY -Quotes are supposed to tell us about the character. Cobold (talk · contribs) - Quotes from the gibberish sounds from Superstar Saga are as useless as quotes saying "I'm the best", as there are a dozen of other characters with exactly the same or a very similar quote.  Caps Lock LORD per everyone above. User:Fly_Guy_2 We need better quotes, like Nastasia's. 3D, qoutes like "Yahoo!" and "Ameena pasta gumba ray bardo" don't belong either. Talk Those aren't really even quotes, but rather should be considered noises that the character makes. They may be fun to some, though they're completely pointless. I say we should go as far as to remove quotes such as "Yoshi!", because really, it tells nothing of the actual character... Keep rend (talk) (edits) DELETING QUOTES? They're lots of fun! C'mon, keep them! Peachycakes 3.14 I havn't seen many of these useless quotes. King Mario I don't see many of those here. Plumber 07:55, 27 October 2007 (EDT) --[[User:Nasakid|Zach121]] 16:33, 2 November 2007 (EDT) i agree with plums Storm Yoshi per every one Stumpers! Keep 'em off of the header if you must, but the fact is if you delete them totally you're removing information, which is kinda counteractive. Comments At the very least, they shouldn't be the lead-in quote. -- Son of Suns I'm conflicted on this one. True, things like "Ahhh!" are a bit redundant in principle. But if you know the context it could have meaning. For instance, in one of the Mario Party games, Peach goes, "Booooo!" Alone that sounds like a pointless, generic utterance, but if you actually hear it, it's hilarious! All in all, I just can't decide which way to vote. - Walkazo See, most of the point in the quote on the page is to show the personality of the character. So, unless the screams have something to do with the personality of the character, remove them. Example: Instead of having "Princess Peach!" as Peach's quote have "Oh? Did I win?" so we can see a bit about her personality...and stuff like that... Paper Jorge! I give paper cuts so stand back! Definately get rid of them from the "main quote" thing, but can you leave them in the article? Check out Daisy's quote page for what I'm talking about. Stumpers! 22:49, 22 October 2007 (EDT) Arend: I don't think you understand, this proposal won't delete ALL quotes, only boring and generic one like "AHHH!!!" or "I'm the best!'. Glowsquid Well, the ones i was sorta talkin about was only stuff like: erto robartello berto, or AHH!!! or all that other junk. Master Crash A quote is suppose to describe the character/article as best as it can (see Snakes' page). If the random gibberish defines the character best it should stay, but if its just some useless quote cause you couldn't think of something else it should be replaced. XzelionETC Exactly Master Crash Arend, King Mario, we are not saying to remove ALL quotes. We are only saying to remove worthless quotes, like "AHHHHH!!!". All quotes that actually MEAN something will be kept. Get it? My Bloody Valentine Oh, well I'm still putting it on keep King Mario To Plums: If you don't really see any of them, why vote? Master Crash "What Other Users Think Of Me Lists" These things are just dumb. We got rid of Cool User Lists, and these are only worse. As you can most likely see, they have caused nothing but bad, and flame wars. Some of these might be OK(Like Xzelion's), but others go over the limit(Like Pokemon DP's, even if they are all MY quotes. <_<). These are mostly just the depressed people trying to make themselves look more hated, anyway, *continues into a long rant about DP that would getting him ****ing banned if he actually said it*. Therefor, I propose that we ban these, as we did with the Cool User Lists(Which NEVER ACTUALLY CAUSED ANYTHING!). Proposer: Uniju :D Deadline: Oct. 28, 15:00 Remove ~Uniju(T-C-E)I am the proposer, and, blah, blah, blah... Full Metal Moogle Just as bad as the cool users list. Ghost Jam Same boat as Cool Users lists. If someone really wants to know about someones past, they can look in the contribution history. Shrooby Talk Is wrost then Cool user list and Hated User list (if they existed) make people think bad things of other users! Everyone has a bad point but you should just see the good ones! Stumpers! My vote is in responce to DP's staement that the Wiki has a right to know. If you have an issue with another user that isn't publically on the Wiki, it deserves to remain private. And really, why post it here just because an issue is related to the Wiki? If it matters that much sysops should be contacted to resolve the issue. King Mario Plumber Per Stumpers, strongly. It is not the wiki's business to know of every arguement someone has with somebody. Keep My Bloody Valentine Hey, if someone flames someone, the Wiki has a right to know about it! These lists show which people have flamed who, allowing them to get what they deserve when they flame. And, you only made this proposal because you are mad at me for adding all of your flames towards me onto my list. You coult end up becoming banned for what you wrote on this Proposal! Zakor1138 Just cause its for good intentions. So what? If you act like a lurdo [1] everyone should know 'bout it. Glowsquid - See my comment below. Peachycakes 3.14 I was against getting rid of cool user lists, and now people are still getting into flame wars without them. But i'm still against restricting stuff you can put on your userpage. Time Questions Per Peachycakes, just because some might misuse it doesn't mean for me that nobody should be allowed to use it. User:Fly_Guy_2 Pokemon DP's right. Cobold (talk · contribs) - Put on your user page what you want. If there is flaming because of it, then ban the flaming. No reason to fight the cause, there are not too many incidents around. Master Crash Not all these quotes are negative, i mean quotes like what Zach121 has is good, or funny ones like 3d's Waluigi and Petey stuff. XzelionETC Per all, Besides mine are only kept for humor. >.> Per DP, thouugh I don't have one Mr. Guy 3D, sure, some people add stupid flames, but some like putting funny qoutes or what some people think is good about them in their lists. Comments DP: -_-' Why do YOU ALWAYS THINK THAT MY REASONS ARE SELF-CENTERED? WHY THE H*** CAN'T YOU JUST DEAL WITH THE FACT THAT I'M NOT DOING THINGS FOR ONLY MYSELF!!!!! ~Uniju(T-C-E) Did I see some anger? It is the path to the dark side![2] Zakor1138 Whoa, whoa, whoa, calm down, Uniju. You continue like that, you will get in BIG trouble. My Bloody Valentine I think we should just change it to "Feedback". There should be no negative things. This wiki is not about pointing out if someone says something rude. Why can't people just ignore it?~PY If you flame someone, you should get in trouble for it. You shouldn't be able to get away with anything bad that you do. My Bloody Valentine Which is why we have Sysops, suspensions and bans. Making black-lists only adds to the problem. -- Chris 15:13, 24 October 2007 (EDT) That's true, just don't overdo it. We all know about what happens if it happens a lot, even without quotes.~PY When I made this list, I had a purely humoristic goal in mind, I didn't try to make myself look hated and other non-sense. You are about the only one that take these lists seriously, and the only one to star flame war over them. As Zakor1138 said, if you act like an idiot, it's only natural for the other to know it. Glowsquid, and the cool user list DID cause my flame wars, check my archive if you don't believe it. DP, I looked at your user page, and you posted countless censored f-bombs. If Uniju is going to get in trouble for what he posted above, and I posted them on my page wouldn't I be also using the language and the flaming? I thought we could only use those in quotes of Nintendo characters, etc., so how do we justify this? I'm not saying this because I think Uniju's comments are justified, by the way. I'm saying it because I want all of this anger stuff to get gone, quoted or freshly written. Stumpers! 01:22, 26 October 2007 (EDT) i agree with PY. Master Crash Most are kept for only humor reasons, however, some are just kept to cause bad blood in the case of Pokemon DP. Therefore if they all stay, the bad blood intensifies, and if they leave, then the bad blood evaporates and we can find humor elsewhere. Plumber 08:30, 27 October 2007 (EDT) Pokemon DP's page is also a really good example of the intensification. You can see Uniju's emotions flare as a result. It makes me wonder if Uniju would have calmed down if the list wasn't there. Personally, I like User peace and happiness and whatnot, so I hate flame wars. If these just cause flame wars to last longer, why are we doing them? Stumpers! 12:39, 27 October 2007 (EDT) Uh, this Proposal ended a while ago. :| My Bloody Valentine O rlly? Can I then beg of you to take down your list, not because you have to, but because you're a good, peace-loving person? *big blue eyes* You couldn't say no to this face, could you? Stumpers! 22:10, 30 October 2007 (EDT) Because I barely have a nice side, no. My Bloody Valentine In case you didn't catch that answer, I'll say it again. No. Hmm... someone needs some virtual pie. Regardless, it's not my issue so I'm butting out of it. Stumpers! 22:24, 30 October 2007 (EDT) Thank you. And, I hate pie. My Bloody Valentine I prefer Pizza. Changes Discuss what goes on the Main Page Today I finally took a look at the stuff featured on the Main Page, and saw this in "Did You Know?": "Ax Mummies are ax-wielding mummies [...]" Yeah... as elaborate as that is, I don't think it's absolutely neccessary for information like that to be on the first page people come across on our Wiki. So, I'm proposing that we have weekly discussions on what kind of stuff makes it to the main page; this includes what's worthy of the news section, what quotes we should use, etc. etc. etc. Proposer: Dodoman Deadline: 21:00 Nov 3 Yes to Discussions Dodo I'm the proposer, yada yada. No to Discussions Son of Suns - That takes a lot of time. Anyone can change those main page boxes, so if something is wrong or is unneeded, you can simply change it. You can also discuss what should be in those boxes on the template talk pages, in case their is a conflict. Walkazo - Per SoS and Wayoshi. Cobold (talk · contribs) - I excuse for my bad choices of Trivia items in this section. I guess it would be better if anyone except me would actually be working on it. This is not the case. Why discuss on it when you're not working? Stumpers! - Sometimes, it seems like there's so much politics that I don't want to touch things because I'm afraid of the reaction. Please don't make the main page like that, too! Besides, trivia is supposed to be about new articles, so there's not much to argue about. Look at the recent changes, then edit. BAM! My Bloody Valentine - Per all. Comments I'm sure it was just a minor lazy mishap. Everything in MarioWiki:Maintenance/Main Page has worked so far. Wa TC@Y 20:56, 28 October 2007 (EDT) Merges and Splits Paratroopa Page I think Paratroopa and Red Paratroopa should be split into two articles because they're different. Who agrees? Proposer: User:Fly_Guy_2 Deadline: October 29th, 17:00 Support Split User:Fly_Guy_2 I am the proposer, blah blah blah. Stumpers! Paratroopa should be a disambiguation page that links to Red and Green Paratroopas. We don't put Goomba and Gloomba on the same page, so I would support this split. Oppose User:Mr. Guy There the same My Bloody Valentine As Mr. Guy said, they are the exact same thing. lla rep XzelionETC (Per all) Walkazo If we split up Green and Red shelled Paratroopas we'd have to make new pages for the Yellow and Blue-shelled variations too. Then we'd have to do the same to the Koopa Troopa colour morphs to be conistant... Not notable enough to warrant a split. What we have now works. -- Booster Comments Umm, then why that red Koopa and normle Koopas toghther in one aarticle? Well that's your anser. Also Fly Guy, you've added some useles info o other pages Mr. Guy the GuyZOMGE Pokémon DP, they are not exactly the same. In classical Mario platformers, Green Paratroopers cannot really fly, but merely jump around, and Red Paratroopas fly in the air. This is the same way in Super Smash Bros. Melee, by the way. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 05:23, 28 October 2007 (EDT) "If we split up Green and Red shelled Paratroopas we'd have to make new pages for the Yellow and Blue-shelled variations too. Then we'd have to do the same to the Koopa Troopa colour morphs to be conistant..." (Quote from above...) What's so bad about that? Sure, it's work, but we're a Wiki! <cheerleader> "We write, fight, oh, yeah, that's right!" </cheerleader> Stumpers! 17:08, 28 October 2007 (EDT) The problem is that aside from their walking speeds there is no difference between blue and yellow Koopas except thier shell colour. All the differences between the various colours of Shells are already described on their respective pages (Red Shell, Yellow Shell, etc.), therefore, so why should we make 'another set of articles?. All it will do will get people frustrated at the number of tiny little pages they have to visit when they could have easiy read all the differences between the races on one Koopa Troopa page. Then there are the acceptions to the rule (like Parakarry and his light blue shell). Finally, you can look at the Koopa Troopa species from a biological point of view. For instance, there are three colour morphs of the Common Grackle, but in field guides they only have one article for the entire species, in which they describe (and picture) the different morphs. That one article includes just as much information as three differenet ones would have, only it was more effective in delivering that info in a clear and percise manner, making it easier to follow than three articles might be, making it better. We want to be a profesional Wiki, and what better way to acomplish this than to emulate the professionals. - Walkazo Good point. I also just remembered that if you beat a Koopa out of his shell, he can enter a shell of a different color. That doesn't change his species, though. You win. Stumpers! 22:50, 29 October 2007 (EDT) Wow, I didn't even think about Beach Koopas! Kudos to you! - Walkazo Gracias... although it makes me feel like a huge nerd that I knew htat. Stumpers! 22:12, 30 October 2007 (EDT) You think you're a nerd? I'm the one applying ornithological practices to classifying Koopas! It's actually one of my goals in life to come up with an evolutionary chain for all Koopa species and then come up with a scientific classification system complete with Latin names! Now that's nerdy! - Walkazo Time Machines Page The Time Machine page consists of three officially named (one being conjectural) Time Machines, all with significant content to have its own article. Also they effect gameplay (sorta). Proposer: Xzelion (talk) Deadline: October 29th, 17:00 Support Split XzelionETC Per Above Booster -- Three of them are officially named, and have different designs and functions. Walkazo - Per all. Dodoman - Per all (except Walkazo >_>). Stumpers! On one condition: see below. My Bloody Valentine Per all. ~PY -They are from different games, and are for different things. Time Questions Per all. MOP - And it is in the Gadd inventions list. Oppose Split Comments My vote stands as long as we can use the Time Machine page to discuss the concept of time machines... and we could do double duty by listing time machines on the article and making it a psudo-disambiguation page. Sound good? Of course, if you want to just make the article disambiguation until someone gets around to writing it, be my guest. Stumpers! 22:45, 22 October 2007 (EDT) I agree, there is also an unnamed time machine appearing in this comic which could excellently be placed on the Time Machine page. Time Questions Both good ideas. And Dodoman: "except Walkazo"? Pourquoi?!? - Walkazo Speaking of that comic, does anyone here speak German? Stumpers! 01:25, 26 October 2007 (EDT) At least two users are from Germany and have wonderful English: Time Q and Grandy02. -- Son of Suns I am from Germany... - Cobold (talk · contribs) 13:54, 26 October 2007 (EDT) Good to know, Sos and Cobold! Stumpers! 12:40, 27 October 2007 (EDT) Planets I propose all planets from Super Mario Galaxy be merged into the respective galaxy article, and the information about the planet made into a subsection of the article. That will allow for fewer articles while still keeping information about the planets. Proposer: User:TheGreatBlockyBoo Deadline: 10 November 2007, 20:00 Support Merge TheGreatBlockyBoo, Per above reasons Cobold (talk · contribs) - Per TheGreatBlockyBoo. Master Crash Per All Oppose Comments Cosmic Koopa to Mecha Koopa The following reasons are: It shows an image that is found also in Mecha Koopa article. Its name is conjectural. therefore, the article must merge with Mecha Koopa Proposer: ¢oincoll€ctor Deadline: 11 November 2007, 15:00 Support €zlo Master Crash She's always right! and this makes alot of sense. My Bloody Valentine I agree with Coincollector, they should be merged. Walkazo - The picture from the Mecha Koopa article convinced me "Cosmic Koopas" aren't a seperate species like their article claims. So yeah, definitely merge them (and by "merge", I mean scrap the conjectural article). Oppose Comment Compare both images, the left it's found in Mecha Koopa article, and the right from Cosmic Koopa article. Bowserjrbots.jpg Cosmickoop.jpg Miscellaneous None at the moment.