MarioWiki talk:Blocking policy

Hey Guys you forgot to put up what is not to be done here like no hate speaches, profanity, attacking users and etc. Also a page like this is made to list of what is not to be done here like no offensive usernames. Super F22 Pilot 18:29, 4 December 2007 (EST)

I believe that's covered in all of Section 2. Wa _T^C_@^Y 19:00, 4 December 2007 (EST)

If it covers it then someone must show it by listing it.(Super F22 Pilot 00:23, 5 December 2007 (EST))

Attribution needed

Hi - a large portion of this policy contains content that was copied from an older version of the Wikipedia blocking policy. It needs to be attributed accordingly on the page. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 17:28, 29 December 2010 (EST)

Actually, I just realized that Wikipedia is already attributed, but is in a hidden comment. This should be made visible. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 17:34, 29 December 2010 (EST)

Typo

See als~~… SWFlash

Should there be some Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

I think there should be several Frequently Asked Questions on the page for the Blocking Policy, such as:

"What happens if I evade an infinite ban by creating another account?"

or

"Can I be promoted to any form of admin even if I have been blocked in the past?"

Other questions may be included, of course. Pdjr9000 15:03, 28 July 2011 (EDT)

Neither of those are really frequently asked. All that happens when a sockpuppet is made to evade an infinite ban is that the sockpuppet gets deleted, and that doesn't happen very often in relation to other offenses because few users are brazen enough to think they can get away with it (which they can't), and I believe it's on another page, but when it is deemed necessary to promote someone to admin status, he or she gets it based on present performance rather than on past action. Mario4Ever (talk)

Mario4, I think that Ban Evasion should be mentioned. Several users have evaded bans, such as Kaptain K.Rool. It should talk about what Ban Evasion is, which ways it can be done, and also what the consequences of Ban Evasion are. Pdjr9000 08:57, 30 July 2011 (EDT)

That's more or less summed up in this sentence, which is already present: "Sockpuppets", or multiple accounts created by the same person, should be blocked permanently. I think the concept of ban evasion is one of common sense. If it isn't, the only time it comes up is when a sockpuppet is blocked for it, and if a user has a need to know what that means, he or she can ask an admin. Mario4Ever (talk)

Please provide Reason

Is there any reason as to why sockpuppets should get their talkpages deleted, and vandals their userpages? Mr Man 09:43, 27 October 2011 (EDT)

It saves space. - Walkazo 11:05, 27 October 2011 (EDT)

Sockpuppets

The first paragraph under the sub-heading for sockpuppets should really say "Sockpuppets (extra accounts created to violate the rules and policies of the wiki) are not allowed. They should be blocked infinitely when discovered and their talkpage should normally be deleted to save space.".Mr Man 11:50, 6 November 2011 (EST)

I think it more or less says that, in different words. Marioguy1 (Talk | Contribs)

Sockpuppets

When it says the last warning should be given to the user, point out that creating sockpuppets is only warnable by administrators for reasons only the proprietor knows.Mr Man 13:33, 11 November 2011 (EST)

That isn't really necessary, as the entire page is addressed to the admins anyway, and normal users can't block other users. Bop1996 _(Talk)

You are aware that...

An account created by a person who already has an account is only a sockpuppet if it was created to violate MarioWiki policy.Mr Man 11:12, 3 December 2011 (EST)

Not in our policy. Pokémon Trainer Red/Mario & Luigi/Mario Bros.!

help

help block me as this user and unblock meeper I did not understand mario wiki os my favorite thing please consider unblocking me.meeper (talk)

IP Blocks Useless?

Are you sure IP blocks will stop vandalism? That Russian troll seems to have been changing his IP address and continuing to hail Yoshi as his "comrade" and even insulted an admin.
The preceding unsigned comment was added by ‎69.35.168.62 (talk).

*looks at anon suspiciously* just kidding. Though dynamic IP vandals are difficult to get rid of by just banning a single IP, range blocks can be used in extreme cases.

Shokora (talk · edits) 02:29, 15 May 2013 (EDT)

I seen a policy page on Wikipedia entitled "Don't stuf beans up your nose", I wonder what would happen if MarioWiki had his page.
The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.35.168.121 (talk).

Inappropriate usernames

What are inappropriate usernames? Merry Christmas! (talk) 19:59, 24 December 2014 (EST)

Swears, slurs, threats, spam, whatever. Use your imagination. - Walkazo 20:15, 24 December 2014 (EST)

Baby Mario

I saw someone get blocked for editing the same thing over and over agian, is that going to happen to me? Because I edited Baby Mario about 7 times in a row yesterday. Plese reply. User:Mario Kart 7 Rules (talk · edits) User:Mario Kart 7 Rules/sig 08:35, 25 February 2015 (EST)

dead link

The two links that read "see below" on this page doesn't work. A gossip-loving Toad (Talk) 03:15, 16 July 2016 (EDT)

Thanks for spotting those: they're fixed now.

Shokora (talk · edits) 17:03, 16 July 2016 (EDT)

Account creation page question

Well, I am completely baffled. So I can actually visit the account creation page (don't worry, I haven't been sockpuppeting), and I now see an extra parameter titled "Reason", and for the description it says "Why you are creating another account". Why is this parameter even there if sockpuppeting is off-limits, and why can registered users visit the page anyway? I don't plan on making another account; I'm just really confused as to why that's there. -YFJ (talk · edits)

I just visited it anonymously and the parameter is not there. -YFJ (talk · edits)

Also, what does it mean that blocked users can't log in? That doesn't make sense and sounds like an error. -YFJ (talk · edits)

Blocking while not being ranked: 2257

Hey, i was wondering how 2257 was blocking vandals without being ranked. When did Porplemontage restricted blocking so that only patrollers, admins and bureaucrats can do so? And why? Just asking. -- FanOfYoshi 08:11, 15 November 2018 (EST)

I do not believe blocking has ever been available to users without ranks. During the time period where 2257 blocked users, he was an admin. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 08:14, 15 November 2018 (EST)

How was his rank removed? I guess due to inactivity, right? -- FanOfYoshi 08:15, 15 November 2018 (EST)

He was a bureaucrat, and he retired and removed his rank. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 08:18, 15 November 2018 (EST)

Restricted Blocking Privileges

How come only administrators and patrollers can block users? Is it because regular users might abuse blocking privileges? Honestly, I feel like some blocked users have only spammed once and should've gotten a temporary block instead of an infinite block. Mari0fan100 (talk) 12:20, 27 December 2018 (EST)

I think it's because that if blocks weren't restricted, we would all block people for fun. Infinite bans are for vandal users. I at least think blocking an I.P. indefinitely is prohibited. -- FanOfYoshi 12:50, 2 January 2019 (EST)