Talk:Elephant

Clean up or delete this page

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Sunday, December 22, 2024, 18:05 GMT

Another generic subject; I seriously could not have made myself any clearer.

Proposer: Toadette the Achiever (talk)
Deadline: November 11, 2017, 23:59 GMT

Support

1. Toadette the Achiever (talk) Per proposal.
2. Alex95 (talk) - I'm for a disambiguation page if we need it. Otherwise delete.

Oppose

1. Time Turner (talk) An elephant appears as an obtainable item in Mario is Missing. That alone makes it of note.
2. Niiue (talk) I'd support repurposing this to be about the Mario is Missing item specifically, but considering how vague this proposal is, I'm gonna have to oppose for now.
3. Ultimate Mr. L (talk) Originally supported, but realized how vague the proposal is. So until it is expanded, I'm sorry. Per Niiue.
4. Chester Alan Arthur (talk) per all this proposal is to vague to pass.
5. Lcrossmk8 (talk) How in the world is this thing generic by any means? I think we have got enough coverage on this thing, and it does make notable appearances in the Mario series. This proposal is too vague on what is generic and what is not. Is it the lack of information or is it the fact that there is not enough information on it to make for a good article? I don't know.

Comments

@Time Turner Even so, the information on other elephants should be removed, as they just make this an overly detailed disambiguation page.
Ultimate Mr. L (Talk-Contribs-Stats) 12:23, 28 October 2017 (EDT)

I won't argue against the article's fluff, but it shouldn't be completely deleted or disambiguated. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 12:24, 28 October 2017 (EDT)

Perhaps the item can have its own page as Elephant (item)? 12:24, 28 October 2017 (EDT)

Hey, I never said that we were deleting everything. This is actually a similar scenario to Beehive. ^(T|C) 12:34, 28 October 2017 (EDT)

You didn't specify anything. This proposal does not make its options clear in the slightest. What are we even voting for or against? Hello, I'm Time Turner. 12:37, 28 October 2017 (EDT)

The title says it all. Clean up the article or get rid of it altogether. If that's the title, shouldn't there be two support options? At the moment, I don't find myself either opposing or supporting, but maybe later on, I might support. – Owencrazyboy9 (talk) 20:33, 28 October 2017 (EDT)

What would you be supporting? Cleaning up the article or deleting the article are two very different options, and the proposal does not make anything clear. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 22:01, 28 October 2017 (EDT)