MarioWiki talk:Generic subjects
Shouldn't this be protected? It used to be protected, but the protection stayed on the redirect when it was moved.--
TheFlameChomp (talk) 22:41, 6 July 2017 (EDT)
Delete this rule
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Saturday, September 14, 2024, 04:15 GMT
Oh, this rule. The rule that's caused the loss of so much information. Why don't the birds in front of Peach's Castle get an article or even a mention under a greater article but a tree with a name originating from a tie-in toy does? The former can be interacted with, as in they fly away in a panic when they're approached, but nope! They have no "gameplay purpose," which somehow matters more than definitively existing, and they have no official name. But I digress. My main problem with this rule is that it tends to be arbitrarily executed and is completely open to interpretation, something we really should avoid on a wiki. Cow, Bird, Frog, Butterfly....yes, they're all generic subjects, but so are coins when you get right down to it, as they've had different purposes and appearances throughout the different franchises, as have Bananas and Mushrooms, and they haven't really been scrutinized like this. Hence "arbitrary." This rule is simply obstructive and annoying.
Proposer: Doc von Schmeltwick (talk)
Deadline: "October 14, 2017, 23:59 GMT"
Support
- Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) Per above. I can not express how much this rule annoys me. Other than say where it deserves to go.
Oppose
- TheFlameChomp (talk) I feel that covering every bird, beehive, and butterfly in the series would be excessive, as some games would have no more than "Butterflies appear in Paper Mario: Color Splash, where they fly around flowers." I feel it is better to have restrictions than nothing.
- Time Turner (talk) Per all. We do not need to cover every tree branch that appears in the background.
