Category talk:Children
WAIT!!! just add Koopalings, not all of them. Max2 (talk)
- I think it should be on their individual pages as well. It doesn't really matter if that page has a link to them all. I mean, they're not the same Koopa. --KPH2293 20:37, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
OK. that's fine. Max2 I'm 2 lazy 2 type it out.
Hey maybe we should just put the kids we KNOW who their parents are.
Should Son of Suns be on here :)
What do you mean? Max2 (talk) (Junior) and not (Toad, for example.
No what I is should the people in category Parents, their kids...never mind...
Should we remove Kolorado and put Cream the Rabbit up? Yes, she has a known parent.Nintendofan146 08:30, 29 June 2008 (EDT)
Lucas and Ness
I find it strange that Ness is in this category but Lucas isn't, since I imagined them being about the same age (and if anything, Ness slightly older). 
LEIRIN
Who's this for?
The intro line implies that the category is for anyone who's ever had a parent, but it seems to be used for anyone who looks young enough. The baby characters are the most noticeable (since when did Daisy, Wario, Yoshi, and Peach have parents?), and there's Kat and Ana, Kiddy Kong, Jr. Troopa, Peewee Piranha, Ness... Most kids happen to have parents in the first place, so it usually works out, but I just find the discrepancy odd. Personally, I think the category would work better if it was solely for kids, since the general assumption is that each individual came from two parents, so listing them seems a bit... pointless, I guess? I get listing people who've appeared alongside their parents, but sticking to the intro line would lead to people who really only had their parents mentioned in a one-off line or an optional description being listed here. Thoughts? Hello, I'm Time Turner.
