MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Bob-omb

Bob-omb

Support

1. Super Nintendo 64(talk) I should feature this article because there's a whole lot of info & images that, I just want to nominate it as featured!
2. Mariobros1985 (talk)
3. Spenzer66 (talk)

Oppose

1. Raven Effect (talk) It has a rewrite template on it therefore it can't be featured.
2. GreenDisaster (talk) It has a very well deserved rewrite-expand template. Per LGM's comment.
3. Commander Code-8 (talk) Hello, Rewrite Template
4. Matik2002 (talk) Guys, i agree that it has the rewrite template.
5. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Please look at my comment below. We need a better explanation for why this article has a rewrite template or else anybody can simply remove it and make your votes invalid.
6. Mario4Ever (talk) Per LGM.
7. Vommack (talk) Per LGM.
8. Fawfulfury65 (talk) Per Raven Effect.
9. Cortez (talk) Per all.
10. Koopa K (talk) Per Raven Effect and LGM.
11. New Super Yoshi (talk) Per Shoey.

Comments

FORGET THE REWRITE TEMPLATE!!!Lost Mini Star09

Featured articles are not based on the character themselves, but rather the quality of the articles they have. The rules for featuring an article clearly state that articles cannot be featured with an improvement template on them. GreenDisaster (talk)

I accept with GreenDisaster: this is based on quality. Also it cannot have a stub template, under construction template and rewrite (and expand, if needed) template. --Matik2002 (talk) 15:20, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

Well, when people just mention the rewrite template, it doesn't really help in any way. I think it's a very weak and not constructive argument. Right now, I see some problems that lead to the rewrite template. The Mario Party section definitely needs expansion. The Game & Watch series needs to be merged into one section to remove all those one-liners. Also, I have a feeling that this article needs some sections, such as appearances in the comic books. I have some feeling that Bob-ombs did make some appearances in those sorts. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

Thank you, LGM. Glad someone's on my side! Lost Mini Star09 (talk)

He's still opposing it. He's not on your side, he's saying that "it has a rewrite template" isn't a very good reason. GreenDisaster (talk)

LGM is female. Mario4Ever (talk)

I know that, I just keep forgetting it. GreenDisaster (talk)

Then remember it!!! Lost Mini Star09 (talk)

There's no need to shout at me for doing something that has no impact on you. GreenDisaster (talk)

Please, I know the Mario Party section needed expansion. Lost Mini Star09 (talk)

If the Mario Party section needs expansion then why support it? Aren't FAs supposed to be pretty much perfect? Koopa K (talk)