Category talk:Chess Pieces

Is this category really necessary? GreenDisaster 14:55, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

I agree, I think it should be deleted. Tails777 Talk to me!

Delete Category:Chess Pieces

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Thursday, February 20, 2025, 16:11 GMT

This category seems pointless in my opinion. One, it's a small category, composed of only 13 articles. Two, it's a category comprising the characters that appear as pieces for a chess game that most of the articles give a single line to, if they even mention it. It seems too insignificant to have a category for it. Three, how many people actually use this category? It just doesn't seem that useful.

Proposer: GreenDisaster (talk)
Deadline: August 6, 2012, 23:59 GMT

Delete

1. GreenDisaster (talk) Per proposal.
2. LightningBlue (talk) Not enough pages and this is a single game.
3. Super-Yoshi (talk) Really minuscle category, don't need it.
4. Lindsay151 (talk) Per all.
5. Tails777 (talk) Per what I said above.
6. Mario4Ever (talk) Per proposal.
7. Walkazo (talk) - Thirteen isn't horrible as far as size goes (originally, there were categories for every type of chess piece: now that was excessive), but when you look at the articles, it's the ugly ducking of the categories: it would be better to just not have it around.