Talk:Wuhu Island

Delete

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Sunday, November 24, 2024, 04:56 GMT

Bop put the page up for deletion but it needs to go though proposal first.

I think this page is uneesary, it's not in our coverage and all the good info's is in the articles. If this appears in more than one, it may be restored then but for now the only Mario game it is in is Mario Kart 7 and it only played a minor role.

Proposer: New Super Yoshi (talk)
Deadline: 13 December 2011 23:59 GMT

Support

1. New Super Yoshi (talk) Per my proposal
2. Bop1996 (talk) I still hold that this proposal should be deleted too, but since this doesn't seem to be happening, per my reasoning below.
3. Tails777 (talk) Per proposal.

Oppose

1. DKPetey99 (talk) You want to delete something due to its minority in the game? It has as much information as it can get, it's not a stub, and it gives information about its appearance in a Mario game. Yes, the allusions to the other games can be shortened, but all that is necessary to do is just delete the part that doesn't follow the coverage.
2. Byllant (talk) - My point here is not that the page is unnecesarily short, many locations have been a minority in many games, the apperance is small but relevant, that or the page should become a disambiguation page.

Comments

It doesn't need to go through proposal; it is clearly unnecessary as per MarioWiki:Coverage, and has almost no information relevant to the Mario-verse now, nor will it have any later without being redundant with course articles. Even if it appears in more than one course, it isn't given a location role in any Mario game, so it won't get created/restored unless that should happen. Bop1996 _(Talk)

@Donaldthescotishtwin: It violates policy to keep it, as per my comment above. Please reconsider your reasoning. Bop1996 _(Talk)

@Bop1996: That opinion was the why I supported, but if there's a rule against people's opinions then I'll just remove it. Donaldthescotishtwin (talk)

We don't tend to base wiki decisions off opinions, so that's probably a good idea. If you can find a policy-related reason to keep it, I'd love to hear it. Bop1996 _(Talk)