MarioWiki:Proposals

Proposals can be new features (such as an extension), removal of a previously added feature that has tired out, or new policies that must be approved via consensus before any action(s) are done.
|
A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed using the code {{User|User name}}.
This page observes the No-Signature Policy.
How To
- If users have an idea about improving the wiki or managing its community, but feel that they need community approval before acting upon that idea, they may make a proposal about it. They must have a strong argument supporting their idea and be willing to discuss it in detail with the other users, who will then vote about whether or not they think the idea should be used.
- Proposals end at the end of the day (23:59) one week after voting starts. (All times GMT.)
- For example, if a proposal is added at any time on Monday, August 1, 2011, the voting starts immediately and the deadline is one week later on Monday, August 8, at 23:59 GMT.
- Every vote should have a reason accompanying it. Agreeing with or seconding a previously mentioned reason given by another user is accepted.
- Users who feel that certain votes were cast in bad faith or which truly have no merit can address the votes in the Comments section. Users can ask a voter to clarify their position, point out mistakes or flaws in their arguments, or call for the outright removal of the vote if it lacks sufficient reasoning. Users may not remove or alter the content of anyone else's votes. Voters can remove or rewrite their own vote at any time, but the final decision to remove another user's vote lies solely with the administrators.
- All proposals that end up in a tie will be extended for another week.
- If a proposal has more than ten votes, it can only pass or fail by a margin of three votes. If a proposal reaches the deadline and the total number of votes for each option differ by two or less votes, the deadline will be extended for another week.
- Any proposal that has three votes or less at deadline will automatically be listed as "NO QUORUM." The original proposer then has the option to relist said proposal to generate more discussion.
- No proposal can overturn the decision of a previous proposal that is less than 4 weeks (28 days) old.
- Proposals can only be rewritten or deleted by their proposer within the first three days of their creation. However, proposers can request that their proposal be deleted by an administrator at any time, provided they have a valid reason for it.
- All proposals are archived. The original proposer must take action accordingly if the outcome of the proposal dictates it. If it requires the help of an administrator, the proposer can ask for that help.
- There should not be proposals about creating articles on an underrepresented or completely absent subject, unless there is major disagreement about whether the content should be included. To organize efforts about completing articles on missing subjects, try creating a PipeProject.
- Proposals cannot be made about promotions and demotions. Users can only be promoted and demoted by the will of the administration.
- If the administrators deem a proposal unnecessary or potentially detrimental to the upkeep of the Super Mario Wiki, they have the right to remove it at any time.
- No joke proposals. Proposals are serious wiki matters and should be handled professionally. Joke proposals will be deleted on sight.
Basic Proposal and Support/Oppose Format
This is an example of what your proposal should look like, if you want it to be acknowledged. If you are inexperienced or unsure how to set up this format, simply copy the following and paste it into the fitting section. Then replace the [subject] - variables with information to customize your proposal, so it says what you wish. If you insert the information, be sure to replace the whole variable including the squared brackets, so "[insert info here]" becomes "This is the inserted information", not "[This is the inserted information]".
===[insert a title for your Proposal here]===
[describe what issue this Proposal is about and what changes you think should be made to improve how the Wiki handles that issue]
'''Proposer''': {{User|[enter your username here]}}<br>
'''Deadline''': [insert a deadline here, 7 days after the proposal was created, at 23:59 GMT.]
====Support====
#{{User|[enter your username here]}} [make a statement indicating that you support your proposal]
====Oppose====
====Comments====
Users will now be able to vote on your Proposal, until the set deadline is reached. Remember, you are a user as well, so you can vote on your own Proposal just like the others.
To support, or oppose, just insert "#{{User|[add your username here]}} at the bottom of the section of your choice. Just don't forget to add a valid reason for your vote behind that tag if you are voting on another user's Proposal. If you are voting on your own Proposal, you can just say "Per my Proposal".
Talk Page Proposals
All proposals dealing with a single article or a specific group of articles are held on the talk page of one of the articles in question. Proposals dealing with massive amounts of splits, merges or deletions across the Wiki should still be held on this page.
- For a list of all settled Talk Page Proposals, see here.
How To
- All active talk page proposals must be listed below in chronological order (new proposals go at the bottom). All pages affected must be mentioned in the brief description, with the talk page housing the discussion linked to directly via "(Template:Fakelink)". If the proposal involved a page that is not yet made, use {{fakelink}} to communicate its title. The Deadline must also be included in the entry. Linking to pages not directly involved in the talk page proposal is not recommended, as it clutters the list with unnecessary links. Place {{TPP}} under the heading.
- All rules for talk page proposals are the same as mainspace proposals (see the "How To" section above), with the exceptions made by Rules 3 and 4 as follows:
- Voting in talk page proposals will be open for two weeks, not one. (All times GMT.)
- For example, if a proposal is added at any time on Monday, August 1, 2011, it ends two weeks later on Monday, August 15, 2011, at 23:59 GMT.
- Talk page proposals may be closed by the proposer at any time if both the support and the oppose sides each have fewer than five votes.
- The talk page proposal must pertain to the article it is posted on.
List of Talk Page Proposals
- Merge relevant information from Starfy to Assist Trophy and Cameos (Discuss) Deadline: May 21, 2011, 23:59 GMT
- Remove mention of Pyoro from MarioWiki:Coverage (Discuss) Deadline: May 21, 2011, 23:59 GMT
- Delete Template:Vacation (Discuss) Deadline: May 26, 2011, 23:58 GMT
- Delete Template:Gone (Discuss) Deadline: May 26, 2011, 23:58 GMT
- Merge Double Dash!! to Rocket Start (Discuss)
Deadline: April 29, 2011, 23:59 GMTExtended: May 6, 2011, 23:59 GMTExtended: May 13, 2011, 23:59 GMTExtended: May 20, 2011, 23:59 GMTExtended: May 27, 2011, 23:59 GMT - Merge National Indoor Stadium to National Stadium (Discuss) Deadline: May 30, 2011, 23:59 GMT
- Merge all colors of Yoshi into one article (Discuss) Deadline: June 1, 2011, 23:59 GMT
- Merge Dark Link with Link (Discuss) Deadline: June 1, 2011, 20:00 GMT
- Leave Category:Aliens in the Rosalina article (Discuss) Deadline: June 2, 2011, 24:00 GMT
- Split Template:Fakelink and Template:Fakelink from eachother ([[Talk:Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Winter Games#Split Template:Fakelink and Template:Fakelink from eachother|Disscuss]])
- Split Rotating Block and Stretch Block (Discuss Deadline: May 29, 2011, 19:57 GMT
New Features
Add a section for Writer Guidelines on this page
Something that really need development on MarioWiki are Writer Guidelines. First let me explain what they are, since I assume most of you are unfamiliar with this term.
What are Writer Guidelines? Writer Guidelines are pages that belong to this category, with the most notable page being the Manual of Style. Writer Guidelines are not really enforcible policies, but provide users with a sort of guide when editing articles.
You may be wondering what distinguishes Writer Guidelines from Help pages. The difference here is that Writer Guidelines are much more specialized about the subject they pertain to while Help pages just give users a general overview of things. Since this is the case, Writer Guidelines have the ability to be very detailed and specific. This is better explained on my pending policy page, User:Knife/Policy.
What I'm proposing is that we allow regular users join in on developing more Writer Guidelines by making the process much more accessible to them. How do we do this? We should create a page titled "MarioWiki:Writer Guidelines", based off my pending policy page, which explains what Writer Guidelines are. As for the nomination process, we can include it to the proposal page in a new section titled "Writer Guidelines". If Writer Guidelines get popular enough we may consider getting a separate page for it, but for now, a section of the proposal page should be sufficient.
Reasons why this system will be beneficial:
- Increased user interest in editing
- Better quality articles
- More opportunities for users to get involved in the development of the wiki.
- More consistency,
- An aid to help users edit.
Things that will be added if this proposal passes:
- A section will be added to proposal page for Writer Guidelines
- A new rule will be added stating that Writer Guidelines will be given two weeks as opposed to one.
- My draft page (User:Knife/Policy) will be created as an actual MarioWiki: page.
- Also see User:Knife/Proposal to see what the proposals page will look like.
Honestly, this system has no real drawback other than potential lack of use, so why not give it a shot? If it doesn't work out, we can always scrap it later.
Proposer: Knife (talk)
Deadline: May 28, 23:59 GMT
Support
- Knife (talk) Per my proposal.
- Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) its worth a shot per him
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Great, but what I'm concerned is the arguments of writing style we might come up, like the singular "they" (which doesn't exist), and so on. The phrase "reason why" is also redundant. :) per proposal, though. If it turns out to be bad, we can always delete it.
- Superfiremario (talk) Per LeftyGreenMario
Oppose
Comments
Removals
None at the moment.
Changes
None at the moment.
Miscellaneous
None at the moment.