MarioWiki talk:Appeals
???
Why was the article unprotected?--Holyromanemperortatan 19:07, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
- So people can make appeals, which was the whole purpose of the page. Yoshiwaker 19:09, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
- Also, the only reason it was protected was because it was under construction. Mario4Ever (talk)
- Ohhh. Well thank you to both of you!--Holyromanemperortatan 19:12, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
- Also, the only reason it was protected was because it was under construction. Mario4Ever (talk)
This may or may not be a stupid question, but...
Can anyone put notices on a user's page if a reminder/warning given by him or her is in dispute and the user who received the warning/reminder does not alert the other user, or is this limited solely to the administration? Mario4Ever (talk)
Suggestion
It needs comments section badly. SWFlash
- I don't see why, people dog piling on comments will just lead to walls of text like the Proposals page and lead to unnecessary friction between users, besides most people will just state the obvious. Which while it'll be a big, big, big, help to use, it's not needed. XzelionETC
Look at me, I found a potential problem, ain't I something?
The page says that you cannot appeal a reminder issued by an Administrator, but the first appeal is one where the user that issued the reminder/warning was a sysop when the reminder/warning was issued, but is not anymore? It seems we need more specificity here... Bop1996 (Talk)
- Yes, but Jorge has been demoted since. Think of this scenario: I give hundreds of users warnings, for the reason "die". There's a 100% chance I would be demoted for that. After I was demoted, would those warnings be unrevertable? ( | )
last
Are you allowed to appeal lst warnings? Superfiremario 21:02, 13 May 2011 (EDT)
Not these two. These are invalid.
- @Superfiremario You can appeal any warning/reminder so long as it wasn't issued to you by an administrator. Mario4Ever (talk)
- The first one isn't because that was for userspace and for making useless redirects and flooding the recent changes log. The valid warnings SFM have are: this one, title=User_talk:Superfiremario&diff=prev&oldid=985719 here, this one, and this one, so I don't think he should appeal to delete these because one of the last warnings is also for editing on archives! DKPetey99TCE 21:25, 13 May 2011 (EDT)
- To answer the original question, you are allowed to appeal anything; so long as it is a warning (this includes {{Lastwarn}}). ( | )
- The first one isn't because that was for userspace and for making useless redirects and flooding the recent changes log. The valid warnings SFM have are: this one, title=User_talk:Superfiremario&diff=prev&oldid=985719 here, this one, and this one, so I don't think he should appeal to delete these because one of the last warnings is also for editing on archives! DKPetey99TCE 21:25, 13 May 2011 (EDT)
@DKPetey99: No. Just wondering. Superfiremario 10:53, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
- Basically what they said, any reminder, warning, and or last warning issued by anyone other than admins is appealable, evne if it is painfully obvious that it's going to stand. XzelionETC