MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Dimentio

Dimentio

Remove Featured Article Status

1. LeftyGreenMario (talk) If the tense template is up for a while and no one has made any changes, then why are we hesitating to unfeature it? Besides, the article seems to be long on the text and a little bit short on the images. There are grammar errors and informal style here and there, but my main concern is the tense template and how the article is written.
2. Pokémon Trainer Mario (talk) It is kind of short :/
3. SWFlash (talk) Some of the images are in bad quality.
4. SKmarioman (talk) There isn't enough information, and other featured articles have been at least twice as long as this one.

Keep Featured Article Status

1. SolarBlaze (talk): As I said earlier, I went ahead and corrected the article's errors, so I'm going to go ahead and place my vote on keeping its Featured Article status.
2. New Super Mario (talk): This article has good quality.
3. Kaptain K. Rool (talk): Per New Super Mario and SolarBlaze.

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

New Super Mario

1. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Extremely vague vote. How does it have good quality?

Pokemon Trainer Mario

1. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Again, vague vote. And this article is not short in my opinion, it's huge.

Comments

In my opinion, you can always change the tense yourself quite easily (though it is quite a pain). I understand changing the informal parts are a pain, though. Images should be the main concern, though. I don't have the game to do this, though. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

I'll see what I can do about fixing this article's problems. SolarBlaze (talk)

The template is still there :/ And did you read my other reasons? LeftyGreenMario (talk)

The present/past-tense errors have been corrected. SolarBlaze (talk)

BLOF, By "good quality" I mean that I beleive that it seems lenghty enough and seems interesting to read.