MarioWiki talk:Coverage
Limiting article creations
I don't like that. While we should have main focuses and sub-focuses, the articles that we want created will eventually be created no matter what. Limiting the number of articles one can create in a week just slows down the wiki. --Steve (talk) 
21:42, 31 October 2006 (EST)
- However, # of new pages is also the easiest to keep track of at Special:Newpages. Do you suggest a higher general limit instead? Wa
TC@Y 22:45, 31 October 2006 (EST)
Honestly, wouldn't this just slow us down! Plus, it would be kinda irratating to keep checking the amount of pages and make sure the limit hasn't been violated... 3dejong
The problem is this is the Super Mario Wiki, not the Banjo-Kazooie wiki. Limits are meant to ensure that secondary and tertiary articles don't dominate this wiki at the expense of Mario. If it is the consensus of the wiki not to keep limits, that's fine by me. However, we should still keep this page to inform people of the focus of this wiki. -- Son of Suns
Shouldn't this be updated now.Knife (talk)
- I'll revise it tomorrow or Monday – maybe move it to a page about what topic goes to what wiki. Wa TC@Y 11:35, 30 December 2006 (EST)
spin-offs
Are there any Banjo, Conker, or any other Donkey Kong series spin-offs where a new character stars in his/her own game?--
Aipom 
--
Well... I think Timber might have had his own game planned, but it was cancelled, aside from that, no. There are rumors of a Squirrel High Command and Tediz game, both of those are from Conker's Bad Fur Day/Conker: Live & Reloaded, but, those are just rumors. -- Sir Grodus
What's Tediz?-- Aipom --
- Robo killer teddy bears. Blah. Anyway, this sounds OK. Just the main stuff.. cool.
3D, who's BAAACK! FINALLY!
Media
Should stuff be mentioned about the tv series, the real life people, etc.?Knife (talk)
- A new policy is in the works. It will cover what you have mentioned. -- Son of Suns
Items and Arenas
Sorry if this has been asked before but... should we make articles for the items and arena's that appear in the SSB series? - User: Ultimatetoad
- Those would be legitimate articles. But remember SSB is of secondary importance, so please try to focus on Mario games more than these articles. Also remember to add only SSB categories. -- Son of Suns
FA
Sorry if I overlooked this, but is it possible for a secondary or tertiary article to reach FA? --Yoshi626File:Egg.PNG 20:59, 31 January 2007 (EST)
- Yes. If good enough. -- Son of Suns
Diddy Kong Racing DS
Hello, everyone! As you all know, Conker and Banjo have been replaced by Dixie and Tiny Kong in the remake of Diddy Kong Racing. The issue here is whether or not that means their connection to the Mario universe should be erased as a result? Is DKR DS a rewritting of the story or should it be considered that DKR DS is just a simple romp with no significance on timeline or Mario's universe?
If we consider this a rewritting, it implies that Diddy Kong and friends never met Banjo or Conker. It would follow that they don't "exist" in Mario's universe per se... right? I know that I shouldn't assume that just because Banjo and Conker didn't come to the aid of Timber and Diddy that Banjo and Conker don't exist, but if we do assume that they do, it's almost like saying that Link inhabits the same world as Mario, and Link is, as stating in the policy, not getting the red carpet treatment that Conker, Banjo, Mario, and the rest will be getting.
So, here's how I see it: 1. DKR DS is a rewritting on the story. Solution: Banjo and Conker should be removed from the Marioverse (which makes me sad, I love Banjo... and the innocent Conker) 2. DKR DS has no effect on the original storyline and is an excuse to revive a classic N64 game. Solution: Dixie Kong and Tiny Kong didn't come to Diddy's aid. 3.DKR and DKR DS both tell different aspects of the same story. Solution: Dixie, Tiny, Banjo, and Conker were present.
Let me know what you guys think! --Stumpers
