MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Luigi

Luigi

Support

1. Hi i'm the one who nominated this article Luigi Has to be a featured article come on he's freakin' luigi:)User:WaluigiRocks
2. LUIGI ISN'T FEATURED EITHER?! My God! What has come to this world! MisterJaffffey G0 Featured articles/N1/Luigi
3. If Luigi isn't Featured then the world has become sick and twisted!!!User:Byfordej/sig
4. BLOC PARTIER. Alright, done with my revision of the article. Bring on the opposals!
5. User:Meat Knight It's Luigi... what else do I have to say?
6. Glitchman (talk · contribs) Per WaluigiRocks and Jaffffey.

Oppose

1. Fixitup Some sections seem mis-placed, some art is bad quality, and it isn't arranged in the same manner as many other articles are.

Comments

I think this article need perhaps an image of Luigi in Hotel Mario and maybe less red link. Other than that, it's definitely a good article. MUCH better than what it was two months ago. --Blitzwing 07:16, 10 April 2008 (EDT)

Uh, just as a side-note... there are Quote Pages, per this proposal. So... Before completley deleting all those perfectly good quotes, make a quote page. BLOC PARTIER.

Many of Luigi's quotes have been moved to extra pages, so do you still have any reason to oppose, Toadette? Time Questions 06:18, 12 April 2008 (EDT)

Hmm... I'm gonna look over this page really well before I vote. Supposedly it's better, but I'll make sure. :P BLOC PARTIER.

Done revising. Looks good to me. BLOC PARTIER.

Fixitup, you should be more specific and give examples. I think your statements don't really help the supporters to improve the article. Which sections are misplaced, which images are of bad quality, and what exactly should be arranged in a different way? Time Questions 15:31, 14 April 2008 (EDT)

Other than pointing out what images are of bad quality, I will easily do everything else you suggested. Why though? Right? Well you see, if I were to have to point out the images, that would show how useless they even are. So, I think it's safe to say anyone on here should know what a bad image is... You know what, they probably don't so here's some examples:

• 1. Is the image cropped from an original version?
• 2. Does the image contain a site logo?
• 3. Is the image altered from it's original size?
• 4. Is the image blotchy blurry, or just plain bad looking?
• 5. Is the image placed somewhere in the article where it overlaps a heading, another, image, or text that is off alignment?

Those all are great examples of the images found on the Luigi article. (All of these include screen-shots and artwork)

As for how it's set up, just refer to another character article. Daisy's page, for example, has up-to-date information, even if it's old news. It also has an order of sections which follow other pages that are in accordance.Fixitup

Hmm... I can only find four images that apply to your "rules." I'll get to work on them. BLOC PARTIER.

Oh, I think not.

• 1: [[1]]

You see how the babies screenshot is going into the side of Captured Kamek? That shows that the image does not fit properly, therefore the way it is set up or the size needs to be adjusted. You see how the DK screenshot is very small, and has almost more text than imagery? Not only that, it overlaps as well. It shouldn't even be here.

• 2: [[2]]

See that? The image is already spaced out, and it still doesn't fit. Also, one thing I want to point out is the fact all of these sections speak of what has happened with Luigi, but none of them refer to any of the video-games the paragraphs are about. How is someone supposed to know when any of this is going on if it's all written as if it happened in the real world?

• 3: [[3]]

This first problem is on this page a bit too. You see how even the smallest amount of text going past an image can look weird if it's not another paragraph? Also, look at this image. This is completely cropped from a screen-shot. This doesn't count as art or a screen-shot. It's nothing. This needs to be replaced by official Paper MArio art, or a good screenshot of Luigi.

• 4/5: [[4]]

[[5]] This is probably one of the lowest quality screenshot son the entire page. Seriously, he's playable throughout the game, get a good shot of him. What... what's this? Is this an edited image? It's definitely not qualified to be a screenshot, and weather it makes a good example or not doesn't mean it should be here. You see what's wrong here, right? Yeah, you should by now. :)

• 6: [[6]]

First problem is an opinion being stated in an images description. Different or not, calling it odd is your own opinion. Next, this is seen around the beginning too, as the image is higher than it should be. Finally, another image overlapping. Fixitup

Alright, that's just what I wanted in the first place. I will work on all of that stuff. BLOC PARTIER. I already edited this image, see the edited version here.

Good change, very good. Fixitup

Alright, one question, about the titles of each section. I understand what you are trying to say, but I want to clarify. A section needs a title that is of the game. So, for example, "Captured by Kamek" would be changed to "Yoshi's Island DS." Am I correct? BLOC PARTIER.

Nnnoooo-.. You would change the sections wording to clarify what game it is talking about. Fixitup

Alright. BLOC PARTIER.

Just so you know, Time Q, I replaced another image. Image:AnimeLuigi.jpg has been replaced with Image:AnimeLuigi.png. Just so that someone can delete the first one. BLOC PARTIER. This one was a bit harder to edit... Likewise, it isn't as drastically changed.