Talk:Gadd Science, Incorporated

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search

Where was this officially named? — Stooben Rooben 22:49, 11 May 2008 (EDT)

Minutes 3:20 Super Mario Sunshine Intro

Δ ΔTheuseD.PNGΔ Δ

Okay, that's all I needed; thanks. — Stooben Rooben 23:14, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
No prob (is that counted as spam?)Δ ΔTheuseD.PNGΔ Δ
No, it's not spam. ;) — Stooben Rooben 23:32, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
Thank you, lol alright im done here =]Δ ΔTheuseD.PNGΔ Δ
You're welcome. — Stooben Rooben 23:36, 11 May 2008 (EDT)

Nice find, but there isn't really much to say on this page other than repeating the list of inventions that is already on E. Gadd's page. I think it fits well on List of Implied Organizations. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 13:21, 12 May 2008 (EDT)

I guess that'd work, since you don't actually see the business. — Stooben Rooben 13:51, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
I concur. - Gabumon from the Digimon franchise Gabumon(talk) 07:41, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
Surprisingly, for once, I disagree. Do we really need to visit E. Gadd's factory or offices for this to be anything more than "implied"? We see Gadd's inventions or his presence in nearly every game since Luigi's Mansion, so I don't think we can really ask for more than that. It fits the profile for an actual organization as much as we're gonna get in a platformer series that doesn't even really have story anyways. Redstar 08:12, 17 December 2009 (EST)

Merge Gadd Science, Incorporated with List of Implied Organizations

Template:SettledTPP Template:ProposalOutcome This needed a proposal. To merge or not to merge? Decide it here.

Proposer: Bloc Partier (talk)

Deadline: 20:00, 9 January 2009

Merge

Leave un-merged

  1. Bloc Partier (talk) -- Per Redstar above; "implied" gives the impression that it is simply made up. However, it appears, in every way, real.
  2. Redstar (talk) - Per my comments
  3. Lemmy Koopa Fan (talk) This should not be merged because actual inventions from Gadd Science, Inc. have seen in the games. (and even the logo has appeared, multiple times)

Comments